"Lets review a few things. One of the 'facts' I posted is that we have empirical evidence that climate changes. We had an ice age, the ice age went away. All without man's intervention. This is called a 'fact' and I posted it repeatedly. Many here are tired of this fact, because it conflicts with their religious belief in man caused climate change."
It doesn't, actually. Unless you know of anyone, anywhere, whose climate model attributes *all* changes in the climate to human activity, you're just repeating an irrelevant inanity.
"Man caused climate change exists only in computer models, and in the minds of believers. It does not exist in reality."
This is a claim that you have yet to support with any data whatsoever. (Another one is the claim that the planets' temperatures are shifting in exact correspondence, as I have previously noted.)
"I cannot prove a negative."
No one is asking you to. Provide *evidence* for the negative, as you yourself have requested that everyone in the thread do for their positions, as I have done for my own claims. And provide evidence for the positive claims that you have made, as well.