that is correct.

current proposal: we can queue rules, but each person is limited to 1 rule in the queue. (aye: socrates, squigs44, kasimax)

I vote yes to SD's latest proposal.

ghug's proposal only needs one more (if I am correct)

Correct Squigs.

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule, amendment or deletion proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made. Furthermore we are resolving the open proposals by a queue, and ghug gets 10 Nomic pointz
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.
13. all Nomic members whose username does not start with a capital letter gain 50 nomic pointz.

nomic members: kasimax, ezra willis, ag7433, jamiet99uk, semck83, guak, SD, Atrum, squigs44, president eden

and ghug!

you forgot ghug and Vash

kasi, the list of members there is missing both vashta and ghug

thanks. and vash!

aren't we all so keen to stay on top of things!

so much cross posting in this thread

I vote nay on ghug's amendment and aye on kasi's amendment.

So once ghug and SD's proposals pass, we can only vote for one amendment or rule proposal at a time, and all remaining proposals/amendments will be put in a queue. That will make things so much neater.

Yea to SD's.

I vote yea on SD's proposal

one more for sd's proposal.

vashta, care to do us the honours?

Aye on SD's proposal. It passes.

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule, amendment or deletion proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made. Furthermore we are resolving the open proposals by a queue, and ghug gets 10 Nomic pointz
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.
13. all Nomic members whose username does not start with a capital letter gain 50 nomic pointz.
14. rules can be queued, but each person is limited to 1 rule in the queue.

nomic members: kasimax, ezra willis, ag7433, jamiet99uk, semck83, guak, SD, Atrum, squigs44, president eden, ghug, vashtaneurotic

woop. now, my rule doesn't mention queueing rule amendments, or what the protocol would be on that, so if someone else wanted to suggest an appropriate amendment to enable us to queue them that would be great.
i would think that (if ghug's amendment goes through) an appropriate amendment would be that we can queue rules and amendments, and each person can only have 1 total in the queue (i.e. can't queue an amendment and a rule). just a suggestion as i can't propose an amendment at the moment.
also note that this would either need to be passed before ghug's amendment is passed, or would have to be passed after everything has been passed with noone queuing any rules.

Here is my proposal:

Anyone who violates any future rule forfeits all points acquired through +1's and is disqualified from receiving anymore points through +1's

and i vote nay to squigs.

nay on squigs.

nay on squigs

ag's proposal: Player with highest points gains +501 additional points.

incidentally, i vote nay to ghug's amendment because amendments are useful ways for solving crises that we embroil ourselves in. there should be a rule to state that amendments must relate to the rule they're amending in a meaningful way though.

ag, you can't make a proposal at the moment (for a rule), squigs is still being voted on.

he can, it is simply not yet being considered.

my apologies, gentlemen