@captainmeme,
On December 1, 2015, in response to my questions about the adjudication, you said:
"Ugh. Yes, looking back I believe we misadjudicated that. Unfortunately we wrote the rules wrong initially in the Mafia QT and had to correct them very close to the end, and I didn't look to see what was written in the main thread. I'm really sorry about that.
Given that I announced that it was most recent vote as tiebreaker in the QT, we'll stick to that now though."
On December 2, 2015, in response to my questions about it being almost impossible for the Power Thief to win, under the rules, you said:
"Power Thief autowins if he survives to a 1v1. That was supposed to be in the PT doc, I realise I forgot to put it in."
Now you say that what the GM says in the Mafia thread (which is secret from everyone else) overrules the official rules posted at the start of the game? So the rules are not only changing, but secret to all but the mafia?
That makes no sense. I could see a rule clarification posted in the mafia thread governing if a rule were ambiguous. But here, the rule was unambiguous. Under the stated, public, official rules, I should not have died.
I could also see this being rather inconsequential for a role other than a third party. After all, a misadjudication between two townies isn't necessarily a big deal. Either one can win either way. But when I was given a role whose sole purpose was to avoid being killed, the stated rules gave me a near-impossible task, and I was killed in violation of the official rules, the misadjudication is rather consequential from my perspective.
I think you should reconsider, if the rules and standings are to have any meaning at all.