Insisting on the rights of the individual over the rights of the state, yet denouncing gay marriage and criminalizing abortion.

I am in agreement with TC. The blame for our debt lies squarely upon Barack Obamas shoulders. Check out these graphs that prove it so:

http://jimcgreevy.com/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/a-bogus-chart-on-obama-and-the-debt-gets-a-new-lease-on-life/2011/09/28/gIQAx40Y6K_blog.html

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Would you like some Ice in your tall glass of STFU?

lol ok actually one of them is probably b.s. :P

I'll bust myself before somebody else does

Claiming that "the government has no right to medle in health care" unless that involves a woman making choices for her own personal healt, in that case the government has to intervene in health care.
Same case as I listed before, only this time it is followed by "the government had better keep its hands off my Medicare"
I could go on, but I think others will continue.

Nike, how fucking stupid are you. That BABY in side the woman...the one you so casually dismiss....IS A LIVING HUMAN BEING....and thus when the Goivernment decides to protect the absolute WEAKEST of humans by protecting that human being inside the woman...it is doing the absolute MOST humanly decent thing.

That you are too stupid to acknowledge that the baby inside a womb is a human make you a pathetic fool.

Nike, I just wanted to say I'm proud to be a pathetic fool right along with you.

Rick Santorum, in cases of pregnancy as a result of rape:

"And so to embrace her and to love her and to support her and get her through this very difficult time, I've always, you know, I believe and I think the right approach is to accept this horribly created -- in the sense of rape -- but nevertheless a gift in a very broken way, the gift of human life, and accept what God has given to you. As you know, we have to, in lots of different aspects of our life we have horrible things happen. I can't think of anything more horrible, but nevertheless, we have to make the best out of a bad situation and I would make the argument that that is making the best."

@2ndWhite --- So....you would therefore agree that a 65 year old man and a 12 year old girl should be married and allowed to fuck if they, individually, agree? Marriage is not a right along the same lines as freedom of expression. Marriage is a benefit, from a state standpoint, that provide certain specific rights (inheritence, etc). Marriage implies procreation, and the future existance of the state. Fags and lesbians can not procreate, and therefore can not sustain the state....and therefore do not deserve beneifts from the state because two bitches decided they like to lick cunt, whether or not you like to watch the videos on the internet.

What gift thread for me. I can see one of the eight replies so I know the mental midgets are frothing at the mouth.

Is there anything more enjoyable that a brain dead liberal/socialist/statist/progressive choking on their own noxious bullshit?

Thanks you children. Thank you.

That is great! Under Catholic law I can run around and force women to raise my rape babies? Count me IN, bro!

Thank you YJ.
It is not a baby, it is a zygote, embryo and fetus. It is not a baby until it is born.

2ndWhite....grow up. Here is the scenario: A 1 year old baby is set down in front of you. It smiles and coos like a baby does. If giggles at you when you make a funny face.

THEN the Government Official comes along and hefts a heavy hammer...and brings it crashing down on the 1 year old's head, splattering its brains all over your clothes.

Who gives a fuck...it was a baby born of rape, and it's life did not matter. RIGHT?

Asshole...

Marriage implies love, plain and simple. You no longer need to be "married" to procreate, I think our current divorce rate is evidence enough of this, not to mention that children out of wedlock is an ordinary and accepted occurrence. Your views on marriage are as dated as your derogatory terms for homosexuals.

Krellin's wife, as usual, is so lucky to have him

So Krellin, if I were to, say, kidnap and impregnate that same 12 year old girl, she would be forced to have the child and essentially ruin her entire life. That cool with you?

Oh shit!!!!! Looks like we are back to Springer YJ! Imma sit back and watch the fireworks.

"Marriage implies procreation"

Says who? I mean I understand that's your OPINION, and that you'd LIKE to define it that way, but you're stating it like its fact and not subject to debate. In fact, by krellin's argument, it seems that after menopause we should just all get divorced? I think not. In fact, people have gotten married for a million different reasons over the course of history. "Procreation under God" is only ONE reason.

Here's what the online dictionary says. doesn't mention procreation in there anywhere.

1.
a.
the social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies, etc. Antonyms: separation.
b.
a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage. Antonyms: separation.
2.
the state, condition, or relationship of being married; wedlock: a happy marriage. Synonyms: matrimony. Antonyms: single life, bachelorhood, spinsterhood, singleness; separation.
3.
the legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities: to officiate at a marriage. Synonyms: nuptials, marriage ceremony, wedding. Antonyms: divorce, annulment.
4.
a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, without legal sanction: trial marriage.
5.
any close or intimate association or union: the marriage of words and music in a hit song. Synonyms: blend, merger, unity, oneness; alliance, confederation. Antonyms: separation, division, disunion, schism.

I think it is a common misconception that raising the debt ceiling is being done to allow us to borrow larger amounts of money. It does do this, but the reason it was raised was to allow us to pay back the interest on money we have already borrowed. To refuse to raise the debt ceiling would have caused us to default on large amounts of sovereign debt. Which unless we want to go the way of Greece (and I think we don't) we should avoid at all costs. Even though raising the debt ceiling, and continuing the pattern of deferment in regards to balancing the budget, is distasteful it cannot always be helped.

Because Eden isn't online:

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/scarjo_popcorn.gif

lol Nike I think I'm participating in too many serious forum discussions. I have to take a step back and remember that NOBODY has EVER convinced ANYBODY of ANYTHING on the internet.

I'm so much happier when I just sit back and make jokes about everything.

Thank you 2ndWhiteLine.

The best part is is that TC has to just wonder who of the ones he muted is posting and why.

Being from the UK, I'm not totally au fait with US colloquialisms. However, from this thread and others, may I assume that Chewing One's Tettleton is synonymous with self-fellatio?

If you think about it, isn't Krellin's existence kinda evidence that abortion SHOULD be considered by some mothers?

lol Yad... it's more like spraying one's diarrhea all over a public bus.

"may I assume that Chewing One's Tettleton is synonymous with self-fellatio?"

I'm +1ing as hard as I possibly can. I nearly fell out of my chair laughing lol

Win.
That was easy.

President Obama's press secretaries comments of the administration's stance on the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision.

“What is troubling is that this decision opened the floodgates for corporations and special interests to pour money into elections - drowning out the voices of average Americans,” Gibbs said. “The President has long been committed to reducing the undue influence of special interests and their lobbyists over government. That is why he spoke out to condemn the decision and is working with Congress on a legislative response.”

There has been no legislative initiative from the White House and no legislation from the Democratic Senate or the Republican House.

Yet President Obama no embraces Super Pac's funded by the very corporate dollars he condemned in the State of the Union speech and through his press secretary.

It their hypocrisy liberals/statists/socialists/progressives don't mind huge donations from big groups- Labor Unions. Now that other big groups have the same voice it's suddenly "wrong."

You can cut the hypocrisy with a knife it's so thick.

37 minutes to lick his latest window. Most impressive...