Messages - webDiplomacy

Chat archive

16 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 2: Seems that Persia has decided to NMR.....
16 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 2: I am not certainly sure, from what words this term "NMR" is formed?
16 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 2: No Moves Received
18 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 4: I think I have to say "Lol rome" Very interesting moves we made in the Punic Sea, yes.
18 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 4: :)
24 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: Perhaps now, when the Rome has been defeated, is a time for well deserved Draw :) ? No? :(
24 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: Rome isn't gone yet. I've made that mistake before.
24 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: Oh, but of course I ment after they are totally goners. Who would want to share anything with a person who has no supply-centers.
25 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: Not that im going to, but i wonder if its strategically possible to take every SC on the board. I know that there are only 34 SC's which mean that with 17 SC's it is entirely possible by cheating and having the other teams work with you. Do you think a stalemate would be forced at some point or do you think that being able to whittle the other person(s) down to only their 3 home sc's worth of starting units is possible through only containment moves and pushing them out on Spring move turns while maintaining advances when backing out of SC's for the Autumn counting phase?
25 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: If the enemies, whose supply-centers you would be taking by yourself, would try to fight against you, It would be impossible. As you would have only 17 armies attacking 17 supply centers, You can not beat one army with one of yours. It is too easy to maintain atleast one supply-center. It could be possible if you could take the enemy a bit by bit, but as you would lose on your goal even when capturing only 1 extra Supply-Center for yourself, it can not be done. Though, if you could choose which supply-centers on the map you would have, it would be possible, but nearly Impossible.
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: the game will end when you have 18 though
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: The person would have to force every displaced unit to be disbanded in order for anything to be remotely possible. Not only would that be a really dick thing to do but it would take years of game time to accomplish against anyone with a brain.
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 6: there was a great example of someone doing this as England last year, I'll see if I can find it, it was incredible, there was a forum thread about it ... maybe one year ago?
26 Oct 11 UTC	Spring, 7: So, now the Romans have been totally Obliterated. I wonder that there won't be any draw as you are so close to winning, Greece. :p
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: Oh, apparently you don't want to win this game fastly. You could just Win this game instead of using couple of years to totally destroy me :/
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: Or it could be that i changed my mind about some orders and didnt change all of them correctly.
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: ah yes, good excuse! you are down to 16 now!
26 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: My changed orders wouldn't have affected my moves in Persia since i never had intentions of moving against you. My moves to cilician were in case you decided to move to antioch that way i could block you from advancing both armies which means even though you took antioch you cannot hold your gains in time to reinforce your push.
27 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: yeh, i get it, just doing what I could you know ...
27 Oct 11 UTC	Autumn, 7: Uhm, you could have saved Antioch with you if you would have moved your Fleet to there. I could have wanted for this game to be ended by now, but apparently you are doing anything to totally obliterate me :( ?