Welcome, Guest -
(Log on)
- Autumn, 2010, Finished| Spring, 1999: Good luck all | |
| Autumn, 2003: what? I didnt move -.-. sad bugs | |
| Autumn, 2007: Are we going to draw or what? | |
| Spring, 2008: Yes | |
| Autumn, 2008: What the fuck...really. First of all I am 100% sure I filled in my moves. Second: Mexico, what the fuck? Are you really this stupid? Clearly you are. Attacking me, two turns from ending this game. I already did push the draw button, even though I was far in advantage I was moving towards a draw at ANY TIME. I never attacked you. And now, look at this. California how would you estimate this? |
|
| Autumn, 2008: Look, in an other game, a guy profited of an afk and just ended by soloyng the game And because idk if you are a douchebagg OR a good person IRL, i just dont want this situation again |
|
| Autumn, 2008: Im sry, again, but : 1. Its just 1 SC 2. We'll draw ANYWAY 3. Precaution, that's it 4. sry again 5. yes im stupid sometime |
|
| Autumn, 2008: 6. luv you anyway :3 | |
| Autumn, 2008: I think you take huge risks by doing this. You are literally Attacking an ally with whom you agreed to draw. It's a golden rule you never attack friends, surely friends with whom you had an agreement already | |
| Autumn, 2008: yea bu tlike i sayed, some **** people have already say that, but they backstabed everybody cuz they can solo. Again, idk if irl you're a good personne (but now i suppose yes) | |
| Spring, 2009: Pffff, see ? i knew it | |
| Spring, 2009: See what? I attacked nobody. You attacked me. California stayed neutral so I have not any aggressive intentions towards him. | |
| Spring, 2009: Well that move in NAO is not a trustable move :P | |
| Autumn, 2009: just creating enough space to defend myself. California have no reason to be afraid | |
| Autumn, 2009: Yes, cuz why you have support move a fleet in NAO, to not bounce him to have NAO, so now Greenland is free | |
| Autumn, 2009: BUT HEY ! Like i sayed, idk if you are a bad or a good guy ! | |
| I will spend no more words on the irrational way you have behaved in this game Mexico. In my eyes you do not deserve a single point, and surely not the points you will get for a tripple draw. However I respect my relation with California, who never attacked me and only for his sake I will agree on the tripple draw, if he still wants to. I warn you not to attack me again next turns, or I will change my mind and than I will try to destroy you with everything I have, and give the victory to California. |
|
| Sure ill stop, but hey, thats what im talking about, the majority of people with a lot of SC is to solo and backstab. (and again, IDK YOU !) | |
| So should we draw now? | |
| Yes | |
| I indeed gave up an ideal position for a solo. However, I like to stick to agreements made upfront. See you next game |
| Florida |
Jesper0228
(1525
)
Drawn. Bet: 10
, won: 33 27 supply-centers, 25 units | |||
| California |
UWannaGetBakestabed
(100
)
Drawn. Bet: 10
, won: 33 17 supply-centers, 17 units | |||
| Mexico |
Siagas
(736
)
Drawn. Bet: 10
, won: 33 14 supply-centers, 13 units | |||
| Quebec |
lambda
(2178
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| New-York |
Nickolas
(525
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| Peru |
anthraxxis
(107
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| Texas |
Corvac
(100
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| Cuba |
Sam the Great
(100
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| Heartland |
mma
(90
)
Defeated. Bet: 10
| |||
| British-Columbia |
tysoe
(0
 )
Defeated. Bet: 10
|
| Nickolas (525 ) | New-York (Spring, 2006) with 10 centres. |
| anthraxxis (107 ) | Peru (Autumn, 2004) with 2 centres. |
| Sam the Great (100 ) | Cuba (Spring, 2002) with 4 centres. |
| tysoe (0 ) | British-Columbia (Autumn, 2006) with 0 centres. |
| Corvac (100 ) | Texas (Autumn, 2002) with 0 centres. |