I like the case, for the most part.
Another few points to make:
1) I was referencing some of the last games, where brainbomb posted a lot, and in my opinion, excessively. I wasn't saying that he had posted a literal thousand posts, in this game or any other, just that he posts more times than in necessary.
2) I agree with you, counting the strait up number of posts does tend to be useless. Please note who actually did the counting, and see that it was not me.
3) Can you show me where I attributed the false narrative? I don't think I did that. Not intentionally, anyways.
4) No, probably not enough time to get a reaction. But my intention was to make a joke, not get info at that point. That one's on me.
5) Isn't... isn't information gathering what town does? How does one help town without getting info?
6) *Jokevotes. I jokevoted Chaqa for out of game reasons. You evidently misspelled that one. Because I've only reiterated that point, what, four times already? Five? Let me do it again: I JOKEVOTED CHAQA. Yes, it was an invalid reason, just like the rest of the reasons people threw out for their jokevotes. And no, I didn't take up the extra space to unvote or change my vote, because things started getting more serious.
7) Mold an impression that I'm bad and inexperienced? I'm sorry, have we played together yet? If not, you might wan to go back and look at my play. I *am* bad and inexperienced, especially int he past two games. I appreciate that you think I though ahead enough to do something like that, but I was mostly being honest and critical of my own play.
8) I don't like the was BB posts, and I said so. He got aggressive, and I responded in kind. He and I have somewhat of a history, and it seeped over from previous games from both sides. It happens.
9) A weak reason that's gotten results in the past. I'll take my vote off of him if/when he comes back, but for now he need to contribute more.
10) "Zorclex has made a bunch of posts, hasn’t contributed much" for a guy who hardcore anchored and then came back hours later guns blazing at a guy who has historically been an easy target, I'd say you're one to talk. And how have I not contributed? No, I haven't made any earth changing revelations, but I've helped the discussion, I got you to come out of hiding, apparently, and at the very least got some of you talking. No reason associating with me? Sure. Go ahead. Don't associate.
So yeah. There you go. a point-by-point response to what you've said. Thanks for case, it means a lot.