Ah I just figured out something about Putin33’s writing style. He constantly complains about people not reading what he writes. People read it, but the condescending preamble comes first and tends to overwhelm the part where he actually says something.
Let’s have a look:
“It's not a racist observation, your claim that the black community is responsible for the entirety of the achievement gap in education”…
Yeah, it was the only thing Krellin mentioned, but I don’t think he was outlining a comprehensive explanation, just speaking his mind.
…“ is racist,”
OK, at this point you’ve just called him a racist for speaking his mind. Interest in what Putin33 is saying… is getting lower… recall of anything that follows is likely to be dim…
…“ as you refuse to acknowledge resource gaps, or access to certain curriculum, or the issue of placing black children in vocational curriculum at an early age, or any other factors”…
He didn’t mention them, but he didn’t deny them either. You’re totally taking advantage of a gap in Krellin’s statements to demonize him. You’re extrapolating this from Krellin’s (in my opinion wrong) equating of Latinos and Blacks in Michigan admissions, but Krellin didn't “refuse to acknowledge” anything.
…”because they do not comport with your anti-black narrative.”
OK, here you just made up a fake reason for the fake thing you created in what Krellin didn’t say. Demonization complete, wait a minute, did Putin33 say anything?
Jesus Christ man, maybe acknowledge the extent with which you agree with Krellin (because at some level you do, it’s clear from the statements) and ask him to acknowledge the things you feel he’s giving light treatment, and indicate clearly how and why Latinos in Michigan are not really in the same socioeconomic category as American Blacks.
This win-the-argument/argument-skill mentality is destroying the value of having any kind of discussion.
@Krellin - your ranting is also unreadable. I didn't read any of it past your initial post.