A "review" held "behind closed doors" by a group all opposed to PPSC.. No independent person asking for submissions. I went to check the email informing me of the review, but there was never any such email sent, so then I looked for the "we are having a review" forum thread...and there was never any such thread created.
If there is no difference between surviving and being defeated then why have those two distinctions ? Why not simply have a winner when someone wins and class the others as defeated ?
If there is a difference between surviving and being defeated when there is a winner, and the fact that the distinction is made is evidence that there is a difference, then why are both these groups treated exactly the same by the scoring systems used, DSS and SoS ?
I have the example of the player who NMR's in 01 & is defeated by 03 ( giving another player a huge advantage that sets them on their way to a WIN ) and let's say, two other players who do their best, but narrowly miss forcing a draw, ending up with ten sc's and six sc's....and your scoring systems treat those two players the same as the blighter who NMR'd...... You don't see any problems with that ?