I will take the liberty of banning brainbomb lol


1. goldfinger0303
2. ghug
3. y2kjbk
4. Captainmeme
5. Balki
6. Vecna
7. WardenDresden
8. ND
9. Yoyoyozo
10. VashtaNeurotic
11. Fulmiantro
12. Maniac
13. xorxes
14. guak
15. redeer1
16. DemonRHK
17. OB_Gyn_Kenobi
18. Jamiet99uk
19. SkiingCougar
20. Chaqa

RESERVE:

1. Delarosa

BANNED

brainbomb

Put me down as a reserve but try not to use me, I'm burned out.

1. goldfinger0303
2. ghug
3. y2kjbk
4. Captainmeme
5. Balki
6. Vecna
7. WardenDresden
8. ND
9. Yoyoyozo
10. VashtaNeurotic
11. Fulmiantro
12. Maniac
13. xorxes
14. brainbomb
15. redeer1
16. DemonRHK
17. OB_Gyn_Kenobi
18. Jamiet99uk
19. SkiingCougar
20. Chaqa

RESERVE:

1. Delarosa
2. Guak
3. Bo_Sox

For balance, I'll play if guak also wants to, then HR could make 20 to 22.

a 22 game would be cool.

Well Guak obviously does want to play, wjessop.


1. goldfinger0303
2. ghug
3. y2kjbk
4. Captainmeme
5. Balki
6. Vecna
7. WardenDresden
8. ND
9. Yoyoyozo
10. VashtaNeurotic
11. Fulmiantro
12. Maniac
13. xorxes
14. brainbomb
15. redeer1
16. DemonRHK
17. OB_Gyn_Kenobi
18. Jamiet99uk
19. SkiingCougar
20. Chaqa
21. Guak
22. Wjessop

RESERVE:

1. Delarosa
2. Bo_Sox

I have decided that when I GM, I will accept 30 players and the flavour will be based on the WWE Royal Rumble match.

Spongebob Squarepants will have to wait for another time.

Wow, mafia is getting real big

We have had a 22 player game before. It was one of the ones that was out of order and I always get mixed up (M6 or M5).

I'd be fine with banning brainbomb for spamming :)

I am not signing off on any brainbomb ban. I don't think he did anything wrong/illegal in MXVI.

We don't get to ban brainbomb because some people don't like his play style, guys. If you think his play is a detriment, you can try to get him lynched for it.

And then we'll lynch you for proposing we lycnh him for being annoying.

Lynch them, lynch them all.

I remain interested in a variant where, once your vote is cast, you cannot alter it. What do people think of that?

If wj likes it, I'm willing to try that for M18.

Why? That just makes a game more scumsided and I don't see how it adds any fun...

sounds like a sucky game. And gives mafia a huge advantage

One vote only per phase? If we do that, how will we OMGUS?

Guys, stop being a complete ass to brainbomb. he's still relatively new and doesn't know how to play. He's only played twice. I remember being completely useless to town for my first 3 or 4 games, though instead of being reserved, he's just more talkative. He'll come around. This is the list.

1. goldfinger0303
2. ghug
3. y2kjbk
4. Captainmeme
5. Balki
6. Vecna
7. WardenDresden
8. ND
9. Yoyoyozo
10. VashtaNeurotic
11. Fulmiantro
12. Maniac
13. xorxes
14. brainbomb
15. redeer1
16. DemonRHK
17. OB_Gyn_Kenobi
18. Jamiet99uk
19. SkiingCougar
20. Chaqa

RESERVE:

1. Delarosa
2. Guak
3. Bo_Sox

1. Brainbomb will play if he wishes

2. We're going to up the number to 22 to include wjessop and guak, but no more than that.

I agree that only allowing one vote per phase would be pretty crappy.

Regarding my variant - you'd be able to talk about who you planned to vote for, but once your vote was in, no takebacks.

In my view I don't think it's a pro-mafia move actually, because it would make bussing harder, and also make lurking somewhat harder, because unless you were totally willing to put your vote in early, you'd need to be around in the last half day or so to cast your vote.

I also don't like the sound of a one vote variant.

Ok never mind, I'll drop it.


What about my previous suggestion that ##UNVOTE should not be allowed.

That is, you can cast a vote, and you can move your vote to another target, but you cannot vote and then withdraw your vote completely.

Otherwise if ##UNVOTE is allowed, the "must vote" rule is almost completely redundant.

The "must vote" rule is there to prevent people just not playing a game, and make it possible to replace them nice and early if they don't.

Yes but someone intent on abusing it and lurking to within an inch of the rules can just ##VOTE THEMSELF and then ##UNVOTE the moment after, and technically meet the rule without actually ever having voted to lynch anyone.

I would at least amend the "Must Vote" rule to say that every player must end the Day phase with their vote on a person, not on "unvote".

In theory, yes, but given people have to go out of their way to sign up for this, I'm fairly sure that's not really going to be an issue. When we've had modkills/replacements before I don't think it's ever been because of someone maliciously lurking to try to ruin a game.