"Doubled the national debt"
The federal debt has doubled but federal spending is just 4.8% higher than it was prior to 2009. Obama added at most $200 billion to the fiscal spending in 2009. The measures that exacerbated the debt were initiated before he took office.
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2012/06/Federal_Spending_Bush_Vs_Obama.png
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2012/06/Federal_Spending_and_Receipts_GDP.png
Bush signed his massive spending bill on his way out of the White House in late September of 2008, which not only massively increased the Pentagon budget to a historical record but also increased health care funding and aid for both automakers and disaster victims. He also signed off on a $700 billion spending bill, which Obama reduced to $475 billion.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr2638enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr2638enr.pdf
The spending amount that Obama inherited was so fuckin high that even slight increases exacerbate an already record-spending level. Sure, he could have cut Bush at the knees, which he did in plenty of other areas, but that wasn't smart and he didn't do it.
"Worst economic recovery since the 50's or some shit like that"
What does that even mean? You seem to admit you don't even know. Where'd you get this from? Seems to me that economic stagnancy is a pretty common thing in this country, but unless you've got an understanding of what you're trying to say, I'm not sure I've got any reason to respond.
"Something like 43 MILLION people on some form of government assistance"
14.7 million people were added to food stamp rolls under Bush from 2001-2009. So far, Obama's number is 13.4 million and the number added on to that each quarter is currently declining.
"Labor NON-Participation rate higher than it has been in decades"
The participation rate (not non-participation rate) is above 60%. It's still a little lower than when he took office. Stats by the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that this is outside of Obama's control and particularly point to the fact that 3% of people not either employed or currently working for work said they couldn't find or don't want a job. 44% cited retirement, 19% cited some sort of disability, 18% said they were in school, and 15% said that they were stay-at-home parents. Many of these claims may well be total bullshit, but Obama can't control bullshit.
I don't know how high it was in the post-Depression era. If you want to claim that, then find it.
http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-4/people-who-are-not-in-the-labor-force-why-arent-they-working.htm
"people have been out of work for so long in many cases they don't count against the bullshti unemplyoment number anymore"
I don't know of any numbers to check for this since things that don't count are probably, well, not counted. The unemployment rate as it is counted is down to 5% and I agree with you that that's not the real unemployment rate, but it's still 2.8% lower than it was in January 2009. The historical median for this number is just above 5% since the 1950s.
"Failure of leadership in the fight against terrorism"
Besides taking down bin Laden, which wasn't all Obama, there's some truth to this. At the same time, I'm not sure why it should be the United States' sole problem to "fight against terrorism." Given that the huge majority of terrorism stems from the Middle East, Obama has done a decent job at getting Middle Eastern nations involved. His drone strike campaign is a violation of human rights and needs to be completely obliterated. Around 90% of drone strike fatalities are potentially innocent civilians, which the military prefers to call "militants" simply because they are within a certain vicinity of a terror suspect. That kind of brash disregard for our own criminal court motto of "innocent until proven guilty" will hopefully be a major stain on Obama's record. Moreover, these drone strikes create terrorists. It's like a breeding program.
Still, a multilateral approach to combatting terrorism is the best approach. The US isn't the only country affected and shouldn't be the only one fighting. The coalition of over 30 countries fighting ISIS is a good beginning and cooperation - at times - with Russia to do the same is a helpful step in the right direction. Shifting the military out of the Middle East and toward China, where the US has far, far more to lose in terms of international influence than they do in the Middle East, is not a bad idea but I don't like the idea of handing off opportunities for a new, bigger war to either Clinton or Trump(/Pence, since he'd be doing all the grunt work). I doubt anyone else does either.
"but which he inherited and FAILED to prosecute correctly"
Not sure if you mean execute, but if you mean prosecute, there's a reason that Eric Holder isn't the AG anymore.
"Sadly, George Bush himself PREDICTED (LOOK IT UP!!!) that *exactly* what has heppened in the middle east would happen if Iraq was abandoned too soon"
What's there to do in Iraq? The Iraqis don't want us there. What are we supposed to do? Seems like a terrible idea to me to sit there and create a factional government in the nation that, as you say, we've spent the last decade-plus destabilizing. Not saying it went perfectly by any means, but we wore out our welcome.
"or he has an alternate agenda which is playing out exactly as he wished"
Sounds like something Trump would say.
"Health Care has NOT exapnded to cover all Americans as promised"
The CDC said in 2008 that 43.8 million people were uninsured in 2008. That number is now around 28 million.
"but the quality of care and the cost of care are going in opposite directions"
This will likely remain the case unless single-payer healthcare *or* totally laissez-faire healthcare is implemented. I know which one works better for more people. Do you?
"and the COST of care is *astrnomically* increasing"
Yes, which is where insurance is useful. Insurance companies and healthcare providers negotiate a hospital bill down miraculously. They don't pay that million dollars.
As for the cost of medicine, that's a huge issue. Obama hasn't tackled it and neither will the candidate he endorsed. There is a rule in place that Medicare cannot negotiate drug prices with big pharma. Big pharma charges a little bit more than necessary for life-saving medication. Coincidence?
"Obamacare has been a complete failure in that every promise made in its passing has either not come to pass, or the OPPOSITE has happened"
If you say so.
"Nobody gives a fuck where he was born, you spooge-sucking disengenuous piece of shit, Bo"
Looks like my numbers were a little off, but...
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/02/15/poll_most_republicans_doubt_obama_s_citizenship_as_birtherism_becomes_a_screen_for_ideology.html
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/14/a_staggering_number_of_republicans_believe_president_obama_is_a_muslim/
…people clearly give a fuck where he was born, you regularly-word-misspelling-crazy-psycho, krellin.
Civil Disorder
)
)
)
)
)