The EVIDENCE suggest that 2WL and his cohorts have the intellectual capacity of a gnat. They think that a "yes or no" questions means that everyone can answer the question. They also, no doubt, wander through life believing in things that they have no evidence to support belief in.
RATIONAL human beings, on the other hand, look at certain "yes or no" questions and do a couple of different things:
Option 1. Dismiss the "yes or no" question as having no value, and therefor they ignore it
Option 2. Dismiss the "yes or no" question is being asked for entirely worthless purposes, and ignore it
Option 3. Dismiss the "yes or no" question because it has no impact on their life, and they simply don't care
Option 4. Dismiss the "yes or no" question because they truly have no idea what the answer is (such as "is the ball I am holding blue?") and therefore choose not to attempt to answer a questions simply to answer it
Option 5. Possibly, if there is enough evidence one way or the other, they will provide an answer with a caveat, such as, "I don't know the answer to the question, but the evidence I am aware of points to 'yes'."
Option 6. They know the answer, and answer the question.
In the majority of these cases, it seems someone who has better things to do with his time ignores a stupid question that is asked by stupid people for stupid purposes.
Any similarities to people known on this forum that ask stupid questions on a regular basis (2WL, bo-sox, jimgov), is purely intentional.
Yes or No question: Are 2WL, bo-sox and jimgov morons that ask stupid questions for stupid purposes on a regular basis?