Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1412 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Friendly Sword (636 D)
18 Dec 17 UTC
Statistical Analysis of Win Rates & Openings for World Diplomacy IX
Hi! I'm curious whether anyone is aware of the following for the World Diplomacy IX variant (clarifications in first reply).
1) Win Rates by country
2) Opening move distributions by Country
23 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
18 Dec 17 UTC
Quick Testing
Sorry please ignore/mute this, need to see how specific links here work though to mimic on the new forum.
12 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
18 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
Please Help
Hi Everyone, I need some help to do some testing of our new forum which will hopefully be completed shortly (thanks Kestas). If you have a minute to spare this evening or tomorrow please look inside for quick instructions on how to help out. Thanks!!!
9 replies
Open
Chance (300 D)
18 Dec 17 UTC
Diplomacy points
Am I supposed to have at least 100 Diplomacy points (including those invested in games) at any given time?
3 replies
Open
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
17 Dec 17 UTC
(+5)
Mod Team Announcement
See inside for details
65 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
17 Dec 17 UTC
On the first day of webdipmas...
The mod team gave to me......(add your own but include my original two plz)...
14 replies
Open
jason4747 (100 D)
18 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Diplomacy Games podcast #24 is out.
Pretty funny.....
0 replies
Open
President Eden (2750 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Is the premise "all men are created equal" necessary for a Western republic?
See above. I have thoughts on this but will save them for a little while later.

Please be mindful of the additional etiquette requests I am making in the next post.
42 replies
Open
Ogion (3882 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
I would just like to say thank you
To the mods, Kestas, Zultar, all you fine people (yes, ebmvene Capt Brad and ND!) for making this a great and vibrant community
46 replies
Open
VashtaNeurotic (2394 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+4)
Alleged Child Molester Loses Election
https://apnews.com/d54394e7782a448e92a53e67f3913a88?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP
Page 1 of 11
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Durga (3609 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
As if he was even allowed to run and that it got that close.
Valis2501 (2850 D(G))
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ DOUG JONES TAKE MY ENERGY ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Thank God that disgusting freak lost. Next step, prison please.
WyattS14 (100 D(B))
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Ogion (3882 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
:)
c0dyz (100 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
It was embarrassingly close though, 600,000 people in Alabama voted for a pedo
ghug (5068 D(B))
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+4)
To be fair, more than that voted for a pedophile a year ago. Alabama's trending the right direction.
President Eden (2750 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
zzzzz

McConnell needs to be primaried so bad. Pretty unbelievable that the GOP could be inept enough to lose a Senate seat in Alabama.
brainbomb (290 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
DILLY DILLY
PE - didn't McConnell beg Moore not to run because he knew this would happen? Or do you just think his money would've bought votes.

And what the fuck does that say about our "democracy"
President Eden (2750 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
McConnell forced Luther Strange (who the Alabama voters didn't want) onto them in the primary stage and then refused to back Moore even before the allegations. McConnell actively chose to lose the seat rather than let a Republican that wasn't his guy, but was his party's voters' choice, hold it.
McConnell has been the Democrats' most effective representative in Washington since Trump got elected.
President Eden (2750 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
To be clear, I don't fault him for not backing Moore from the beginning, because Moore is a relatively extreme candidate. I fault him for being inept enough to back the wrong horse in the primary and then fail to back his party's choice at any point after Moore won. Independent of one's opinion on Moore, the fact that a card-carrying Democrat with all of the standard liberal progressive policy platforms got elected in *Alabama* is a scathing indictment on McConnell's leadership. He's got to go.
ghug (5068 D(B))
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
And here I thought you were mad at McConnell because he let his party run a pedophile.
c0dyz (100 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
I think that a dem got elected in Alabama because people realize how fucking shitty the GOP and Donald Trump is.
So you're saying that McConnell not supporting a guy who wanted to get rid of all the Amendments after the 10th, was evicted from his judge position twice (already showing incompetence in office), and spoke with my about the times of slavery.....that makes him a bad Republican? So you're saying Republicans should have no moral backbone? To the party line at all costs? And that's not even going into the child molestation stuff.

Republican senators are celebrating right now. Moore would've been a PR nightmare for the party in 2018, or are you blinded to that? Distancing himself from Moore was the smartest thing McConnell has done.
*spoke wistfully
No, the bulk of my frustration with McConnell as a GOP leader is how the primaries were mismanaged. He could have supported someone like Mo Brooks, who also ran in the Republican primaries, had won office in Alabama three times before, and wasn't a PR nightmare in the making. Instead he backed his empty suit Luther Strange and you see what happened.
**with McConnell in this case, anyway. He's been pretty terrible as a leader before the special election primary
And moreover, I think it's more of an indictment of Moore's irreverence to the party. When your party leadership is saying "don't run, step aside" it's probably for good reason. When your future colleagues are denouncing you, threatening to investigate you and bar you from your seat, that's a sign you shouldn't take the job. Had he won, he'd be a powerless, hated figure in the center and a black stain on the party in upcoming elections.

And you say that's McConnell's fault and not Moore's? That's a laugh. Unless, again, you think it's all about the money.
Oh, I have no idea how the primaries were conducted.
President Eden (2750 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
The election tonight is what it is. Moore was obviously a high-risk candidate and the GOP paid the price.
The grotesque mismanagement happened back in the primaries. Moore got a groundswell of support from Alabama voters who felt like the GOP establishment was forcing a representative on them that they didn't want.
Reminds me of how Louisiana got its current Democratic governor, they forced David Vitter on us as the Republican candidate and got burned.

Basically I'm sick of incompetent GOP elites making stupid decisions in their quest to get only their good ole baws into office, at the expense of the people they're supposed to represent.
JamesYanik (548 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
I can't +1 this thread enough. we need people who are on some basic level good people. child molestation = someone not fit for office.

even if you are APPALLED by Doug jones, I'd rather see even Karl Marx in one damn senate seat before a child molester.

hopefully there's a bigger cleaning of house to come, word from the grapevine says washpo has a list of names in the dozens in gov't, and it should be coming out soon
Durga (3609 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
nd: karl marx was a child molester
Jeff Kuta (2066 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
Maybe the problem is with the people who VOTE Republican, not the Republican leadership.

That's how we got Trump and almost got Moore.
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
13 Dec 17 UTC
I don’t usually wade into these conversations but seriously guys. An election was had and the fault of this election falls on the republican base, who voted for this candidate in the primary. It’s not anyone in the parties fault but the combination of all of their stubbornness that cost them this election. If the Republican Party was truly invested in trying here they would have put the money behind Strange after the Moore allegations came out and entered him as a write in. They definitely would have lost but they would have saved face. The fact that they WILLINGLY supported a racist pedophile “judge” who doesn’t understand our constitution; says more about the party than they’d like to admit. The fact that it was even a question that needed to be asked of other Republicans if they support him is atrocious. I am by NO means a Democrat or a liberal, and even I’m disappointed in the Republican Party.
JamesYanik (548 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
I mean it's stupidity AND vileness. they could have arranged a write in campaign a month ago, but they stuck with him. half of them went into conspiracy land and the other hand said 'so what'

fortunately enough told him to fuck off so that he didn't win it in the end
President Eden (2750 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Ramrodding your force-fed candidate the voters already rejected would have been a complete disaster. That wasn't and never was going to be the answer.

Y'all are so eager to gloat or make parsimonious declarations that you don't even bother to try to understand the underlying causes of why bizarre and unexpected things happen.
Durga (3609 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
A child molester is the answer instead?
There *wasn't* a good answer at that point. The choice was between running with the candidate your base elected, which had a slew of problems which everyone already knows, or rig your primaries so your guy got in, destroy voter trust and turnout for years and still lose.
Everything was bad the moment the primary runoff was between Strange and Moore, and the fault for that lies with GOP leadership for pushing Strange when he was obviously not going to get it done.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
The problem is that a child molester just ran and got 600,000 votes for office. The rest is just politics.

Page 1 of 11
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

326 replies
Durga (3609 D)
14 Nov 17 UTC
(+24)
webDiplomacy Mentor-Apprentice Program
See below
245 replies
Open
AtomicOrangutan (95 D)
17 Dec 17 UTC
2 new live and fast games
Created two live games: One Ancient Mediterranean, and One is Germany vs. Italy live

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=212868
1 reply
Open
GeneralKul (100 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
dont know where to ask, can you use another player fleet without their approval
so say an opposing player is gonna move an army from london to brest and have a fleet in the english canal. can i use the same fleet to move my army from pic to wales without their approval?
4 replies
Open
AtomicOrangutan (95 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
New fast Classic game !
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=212852

Here's the new game
0 replies
Open
AtomicOrangutan (95 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
New Fast paced classic mode game
Here is the new game! Can't find the usual new game forum page, but the game ID is http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=212845
3 replies
Open
AtomicOrangutan (95 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
New game for the fast Mediterranean
Here's a fast game with Ancient Medi. http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=212846

Idk where to post the games other than creating a new thread.
2 replies
Open
TrPrado (461 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
BREAKING
Austria has broken ranks, leaving precisely 3 left in the peace:

gameID=166960
17 replies
Open
Thaneofwhiterun (1516 D)
12 Dec 17 UTC
(+2)
Underrepresented minority groups.
I think that when people have been singing the praises of both vanilla and strawberry milkshakes, the truly greatest milkshakes have fallen to the wayside. Chocolate-Peanut butter shakes are the best and you all need to see the error of your ways.
6 replies
Open
dank57 (70 D)
15 Dec 17 UTC
Anyone available to cancel a game?
I don't know the protocol or how often this happens, but the site crashed, and now Silent Partners-3 is back up, some countries' moves processed and others didn't. I watch all the games in this series (I have set up the games). I hope we're not expected to continue under conditions like these, but i'm open to however people usually handle this.
17 replies
Open
CoachShack (223 D)
15 Dec 17 UTC
Might be a stupid question, but I can't remember
When a country that has gone into civil disorder is taken over by a new player in anon mode, is there a global message telling the rest of the group that the country has a new owner?
5 replies
Open
fourofswords (415 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
joinable games
Why are there games under "joinable" that cannot be joined? Right now there are many.
2 replies
Open
damian (675 D)
09 Dec 17 UTC
The Ghug Question
Webdip please help us settle an argument, as per his request.
Ghug wants to know if he's a bad bitch or a basic bitch.
39 replies
Open
A_Tin_Can (2234 D)
16 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
WebDiplomacy github accepting pull requests again
Hello developers! Feel like some Christmas hobby time? The webdiplomacy master branch on github is now in sync with the server again, and so it's very easy for us to push changes to the site. Pull requests welcome!
1 reply
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+21)
(Un)Official webDip Xmas Holiday Party!
webDip members and ex-moderators in good standing are invited to the first annual webDip Xmas Party. See below for the rules.
76 replies
Open
WyattS14 (100 D(B))
16 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
Loving the mobile site!
Job well done team!
0 replies
Open
Literary Pugilist (291 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
(+1)
Resulting Fallacy
This article is about decision making in poker, but I think it equally applies to Diplomacy and well lots of other things too. I think a lot of players, including myself, fall into this trap of believing everything that works was a good decision and everything that doesn't was a bad one.

http://nautil.us/issue/55/trust/the-resulting-fallacy-is-ruining-your-decisions
6 replies
Open
Foxcastle (100 D)
14 Dec 17 UTC
Looking for anonymous opponent in canceled FvA Live-117 Game
We were going to set up a practice game, but got lost when we canceled...
9 replies
Open
Nikola Maric Eto (24945 D)
10 Dec 17 UTC
(+3)
Five years on WebDiplomacy
Cheers to you, souls! :)))
I'm high and drunk. Which is good.
7 replies
Open
dank57 (70 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
Brainstorming on getting more no-press live classic games
Arg! We had 6 for a no-press (i.e. no-chat) live game tonight, no cigar. And there haven't been a lot of no-press Many years ago, my FTF Dip crew had a similar problem ... some wanted and had time for no-press, others didn't, so we couldn't get 7 ... and we came up with a neat solution, which I'll share in a minute. But first ... anyone have advice on how we drum up support for a live no-press game?
9 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
13 Dec 17 UTC
ANTIFA recruitment drive
Lets get signuos going for the Webdip Antifa chapter. Given the rules we should stress that our chapter will be a non-violent one. Our focus will be bringing rainbow colored punch to racist rallies and encouraging patient nonviolent discourse about the dangers of facism. Sign up here!
15 replies
Open
Page 1412 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top