Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

Any political discussion should go here. This subforum will be moderated differently than other forums.
Forum rules
1.) No personal threats.
2.) No doxxing/revealing personal information.
3.) No spam.
4.) No circumventing press restrictions.
5.) No racism, sexism, homophobia, or derogatory posts.
Message
Author
worcej
Posts: 9228
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 5313

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#141 Post by worcej » Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:12 am

God damn Jamie, take a fucking joke.

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 22463
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 14606
Contact:

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#142 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:14 am

I think we have established this is not a dialogue in which I think joking is appropriate.

worcej
Posts: 9228
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 5313

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#143 Post by worcej » Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:25 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:14 am
I think we have established this is not a dialogue in which I think joking is appropriate.
Then take a break.

Again: no one here is against you on this issue.

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 22463
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 14606
Contact:

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#144 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:55 am

You're right Worcej, sorry to call you names. I was angry.

Fluminator
Posts: 4192
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:50 pm
Karma: 2897

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#145 Post by Fluminator » Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:11 pm

I just shared that article because I was shocked it was real and that someone actually wrote it as a response to what was going on.

I have no idea what Jamiet is freaking out about, but that's pretty normal of him.

Fluminator
Posts: 4192
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:50 pm
Karma: 2897

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#146 Post by Fluminator » Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:35 pm

To be clear, I understand Jamiet being upset about abortion, I just have no idea why he's calling me and worcej sexist names for mocking a stupid American article about it.

worcej
Posts: 9228
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 5313

Re: Roe v. Wade SCOTUS Opinion leak confirmed

#147 Post by worcej » Wed Jun 29, 2022 4:26 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:55 am
You're right Worcej, sorry to call you names. I was angry.
It's all good - I understand the passion you have about this topic and the feeling that my opinion may be against abortion.

I want you to understand I want legal safe abortions for every woman in this country, which should be established with a federal law that explicitly states the timeframe on when the ability to choose to have one ends and what exceptions there are to this timeframe.
1

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests