Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

[Squigs44]

I'm not supporting a no-lynch anymore. When I think again, no-lynch is a bad idea. Also I want a tie, because if there's a tie and judge decides, it means we didn't lynch the judge because judge wouldn't decide for himself. This means we have 3/12 chance to hit a witch. If we have a majority lynch, it means we have 3/13 chance. That's why I want a tie.

Wait a moment.

There is some sense to this proposal. If there is a draw, and the judge gets to decide, then the chances of lynching a scum, even if the judge decides on the basis of very little information, are increased.

What do other persons think of Yavuzovic's idea?

I think this means it's not bad if we have a tie. However, if we purposefully go for a tie it could limit our information we gather from peoples votes and how people react. Also, what if Y2k is the judge and kills our obvtown again?

[Jamiet99uk]

##calleth GM

Can you post a vote Count please?

[bozotheclown]

I'm totally up with an Ezio vote. He looks scummy, is overly interested in himself, and hasn't addressed Thomas's case.

##Vote.Ezio

This vote was not counted by the bot because of the format.

[bozotheclown]

Otherwise I think the bot count is correct.

[y2kjbk]

I'm not supporting a no-lynch anymore. When I think again, no-lynch is a bad idea. Also I want a tie, because if there's a tie and judge decides, it means we didn't lynch the judge because judge wouldn't decide for himself. This means we have 3/12 chance to hit a witch. If we have a majority lynch, it means we have 3/13 chance. That's why I want a tie.

##VOTE yavuzovic. These strategies of surmising over how to leverage given town roles while in the process effectively encouraging town to restrict their need to express straight-up opinions on who should be lynched are so scummy to me. First the acolyte then the judge.

[bozotheclown]

Interesting. Can anyone other than doubting Thomas explain the case against me and why it's convincing them?

Here is what his case boiled down to:
Ezio is not as towny as most people think he is. He's done more than most other people in the game as far as discussing things, but because he hasn't done any "genuine scum hunting" in the first part of d1 he's not actually town yet. Therefore I will acumreae him and vote him.
What his case was missing was any scummy thing I've done. It looks more like scum being worried about me being towncleared so early and making a case to get me lynched, or at least scumread, rather than being a correct clear.

Are you making a case on DoubtingThomas?

[DoubtingThomas]

Interesting. Can anyone other than doubting Thomas explain the case against me and why it's convincing them?

Here is what his case boiled down to:
Ezio is not as towny as most people think he is. He's done more than most other people in the game as far as discussing things, but because he hasn't done any "genuine scum hunting" in the first part of d1 he's not actually town yet. Therefore I will acumreae him and vote him.
What his case was missing was any scummy thing I've done. It looks more like scum being worried about me being towncleared so early and making a case to get me lynched, or at least scumread, rather than being a correct clear.

Excuse me? You have not addressed anything scummy I have done before wanting to lynch me

you said i made a useless post. that is NAI at best, especially if I picked my game up afterwards. For you to shade my case by saying illogical statements like, "What his case was missing was any scummy thing I've done." when you yourself have never pointed a single scummy thing I have done NOR what damo has done, that is some ultimate expert level hypocritical shade we have going on here

if you think my slam dunk case on you is 'scum being worried about you being towncleared' over absolutely no basis that no one (not even your biggest fan, squigs) has provided, you are getting too cocky here.

you weren't getting town cleared in a million years, you are shading me with the same logic that can be applied to yourself.

this post is so bad i have trouble thinking of how to reply to it

[DoubtingThomas]

all squigs have ever said about you and wanting to lump you is essentially, you are too smart for us and that's why your posts lack reasoning behind your scum reads

that is nowhere near being town clearing yourself so i dont know what you are even implying there

[WarLegend]

Ezio: 4 votes (Bozo, damo, doubtingthomas, Jamie)
bo_sox: 2 votes (Ezio, worcej)
bozo: 2 votes (yavu, rdrivera)
damo: 1 vote (Squiggs)
DoubtingThomas: 1 vote (ND)
worcej: 1 vote (Bo)
y2kjbk: 1 vote (Vekna)
Yavu: 1 vote (Y2k)

Majority to Lynch is 7.
2 hours and 20 minutes left of D1

[DoubtingThomas]

Anyone that wants to listen.

Stupid wagons against people when they have played well are the reason people stop trying and turn into lurkers until the endgame. It is maddening and we always seem to have one.

what makes you think ezio is so surely town?

[DoubtingThomas]

Anyone that wants to listen.

Stupid wagons against people when they have played well are the reason people stop trying and turn into lurkers until the endgame. It is maddening and we always seem to have one.

what makes you think ezio is so surely town?

if you are too smart to explain that shit, maybe that's why you always have people raising the stupid wagons? cuz wagons only happen if more than enough people believe on the reason for such wagon to be even formed to begin with?

why dont you share your knowledge instead of trying to be high and mighty

[bozotheclown]

Anyone that wants to listen.

Stupid wagons against people when they have played well are the reason people stop trying and turn into lurkers until the endgame. It is maddening and we always seem to have one.

Wanna lynch ND then?

I can't think of a useful thing ND has done.

ND has not posted in over a day. I think lynching a lurker is a reasonable option.

[Jamiet99uk]

Woohoo, let's do it.

##VOTE ND

[Jamiet99uk]

ALL ABOARD

[DoubtingThomas]

Woohoo, let's do it.

##VOTE ND

why do you want to lynch ND so badly?

you remember his last game when he was a scum and was VERY engaged?

[bozotheclown]

##VOTE ND

I am not sure about the Ezio vs. DoubtingThomas interaction.

[DoubtingThomas]

##VOTE ND

I am not sure about the Ezio vs. DoubtingThomas interaction.

seems like you too easily swing around your vote even though you were pretty serious about voting me making multiple cases on me.

[bozotheclown]

##VOTE ND

I am not sure about the Ezio vs. DoubtingThomas interaction.

seems like you too easily swing around your vote even though you were pretty serious about voting me making multiple cases on me.

I would be willing to move my vote back to you if there is interest.

[bozotheclown]

I'm not supporting a no-lynch anymore. When I think again, no-lynch is a bad idea. Also I want a tie, because if there's a tie and judge decides, it means we didn't lynch the judge because judge wouldn't decide for himself. This means we have 3/12 chance to hit a witch. If we have a majority lynch, it means we have 3/13 chance. That's why I want a tie.

Wait a moment.

There is some sense to this proposal. If there is a draw, and the judge gets to decide, then the chances of lynching a scum, even if the judge decides on the basis of very little information, are increased.

What do other persons think of Yavuzovic's idea?

I think this means it's not bad if we have a tie. However, if we purposefully go for a tie it could limit our information we gather from peoples votes and how people react. Also, what if Y2k is the judge and kills our obvtown again?

We do not need a tie, if no one reaches 7 votes, the Judge can pick whoever he wants.

[WarLegend]

##GMNOTE: The peterbot is working and accurate now (so amazing)