To me it's just making mountains of not much. The majority of those posts are from the first half of D1, and you're taking some serious reads on statements that I don't think we're made very seriously. You accuse most of his posts being sarcasm and such, but those were first half of D1 posts.
At the very most, I would consider it slightly suspect behavior (mainly the inconsistency you said around Durga and buddying of blamp), but I would never advocate a case on Fox/Vecna based on that alone, when there's so many other targets that could have better cases made of them.