M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

[snowy801]

@Snowy: Could you answer the question about why you suggested Bona had more than one item?

that would be a typo my guy

[ghug]

If I have responded to your question, and if you're confident you can make the links, then did I really dodge your question at all?

I purport not.

You still haven't answered his question, Jamie.

You've now answered one of mine and not the other.

Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.

I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.

[Jamiet99uk]

@Snowy: Could you answer the question about why you suggested Bona had more than one item?

that would be a typo my guy

Okay. Thanks for clarifying.

[rdrivera2005]

Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.

What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.

[Jamiet99uk]

You still haven't answered his question, Jamie.

You've now answered one of mine and not the other.

Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.

I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.

I don't think I've ignored you at all.

Was there a specific actual question?

[ghug]

Wait hang on, I just had a thought

Should whoever got bona's items claim, if they are town?

I had this thought too. I think maybe at EoN (or if they get daykilled) they should claim that they got the item, but not what it was. It's super helpful in narrowing the 3P but also obviously makes you a target.

It's also worth contemplating giving one's items to townreads once one is known to have multiple items.

[Jamiet99uk]

Ghug is very self important isn't he?

[ghug]

And why you are not scumreading Jamiet anymore? I find his posts even more scummier. Jamiet town indignation feels natural, this game he looks like a bad copy of this, even him telling he is tryng to play differently.

To be fair, Jamiet claimed he would try to play differently before he drew his card.

He hasn't played differently in the way he claimed he would, though. He just feels fake.

[snowy801]

Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.

What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.

Your post seemed to imply that Jamiet calling you a lurker is scummy because you already explained why your activity level is so low.

But you are a lurker.

Which would be fine on its own, but you attached a vote on the end making it seem more significant. Even with the "by the way", a consolidated thought might be good on why you overall think Jamiet is scum.

[Jamiet99uk]

And why you are not scumreading Jamiet anymore? I find his posts even more scummier. Jamiet town indignation feels natural, this game he looks like a bad copy of this, even him telling he is tryng to play differently.

To be fair, Jamiet claimed he would try to play differently before he drew his card.

He hasn't played differently in the way he claimed he would, though. He just feels fake.

I'm as organic as the fresh earth, my dude.

[Jamiet99uk]

I am pleased that I have prompted Rdrivera to increase his participation.

[Jamiet99uk]

Now I am going to get off the train and go to the pub. Later, potatoes.

[ghug]

Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.

I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.

I don't think I've ignored you at all.

Was there a specific actual question?

That was the question.

You came back to me and snowy both voicing suspicion of you, and you responded only to Snowy's points. This is part of what is now a pattern of being avoidant (see again my having to point out this question several times), though as Snowy points out, you've moved to avoiding by being intentionally obtuse rather than simply ignoring.

[ghug]

There are like seven people who haven't done anything of note today.

[bozotheclown]

Why did you move your vote from damo to Bonatogether after the previous 2 votes were for damo, bring him to a tie for the lead wagon?

We spent too long at 3-3-3, and I always tend to believe a complacent D1 EoD means TvT.

I was actually going to hop off of Bona and look for alternatives, but nothing appeared and the rest, as they say, was history.

You did move back to damo when Bonatogether and Maniac were both at 4 votes and damo was not likely to be the DK, and you later said this about your vote:

There was no time for Brian to be a thing. To think otherwise is foolish or disingenuous.

damo had an additional vote and previous noises of support. I had hoped there would be a last minute shift, but there wasn't, so I went to my last resort.

This seems to imply damo was your top DK choice, yet it was your moving your vote from damo to Bonatogether that likely took damo out of contention for the DK. Also, damo had the same 2 votes he did when you left his wagon, so I do not know what you mean when you say he "had an additional vote".

I think your vote movement D1 EOD is consistent with bussing damo while also trying to make sure he was not the DK.

Also, celaph was one of the two who followed your vote for damo, so it is possible he was NKed to allow you to continue to bus damo while reducing the chance of him becoming the DK.

[rdrivera2005]

Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.

What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.

Your post seemed to imply that Jamiet calling you a lurker is scummy because you already explained why your activity level is so low.

But you are a lurker.

Which would be fine on its own, but you attached a vote on the end making it seem more significant. Even with the "by the way", a consolidated thought might be good on why you overall think Jamiet is scum.

Ok, for me it was clear it was a progression from my other posts where I agreed with Vecna's initial scumread of Jamiet and disagreed when Vecna said he looks more towny when I think he looks more scummy. But I didn't vote because I hadn't catch up and I don't like to vote before being updated.

So, my vote on Jamiet isn't because he kept calling me lurker (which I have been) but because I already scumread him.

The fact he specifically picked up on me lurking after I started to scumread him (at night he called out all lurkers, today only me) is just another thing that point to scum Jamiet.

[snowy801]

Has Vecna given out a single town read aside from Bob (who is the easiest obvtown to give, and thus more or less meaningless)

I see some positive noise about Maniac, and there's his list (which has Bob, Celaph, HB and worcej on what I presume is his "towny" cutoff).

But mostly he's been looking for reasons to scum read people without really hard committing to it. Thoughts?

[ghug]

Has Vecna given out a single town read aside from Bob (who is the easiest obvtown to give, and thus more or less meaningless)

I see some positive noise about Maniac, and there's his list (which has Bob, Celaph, HB and worcej on what I presume is his "towny" cutoff).

But mostly he's been looking for reasons to scum read people without really hard committing to it. Thoughts?

Yeah, I'm pretty unimpressed with Vecna so far.

I also like bozo's recent comments on you. Care to respond?

[snowy801]

This seems to imply damo was your top DK choice, yet it was your moving your vote from damo to Bonatogether that likely took damo out of contention for the DK. Also, damo had the same 2 votes he did when you left his wagon, so I do not know what you mean when you say he "had an additional vote".

I think your vote movement D1 EOD is consistent with bussing damo while also trying to make sure he was not the DK.

Also, celaph was one of the two who followed your vote for damo, so it is possible he was NKed to allow you to continue to bus damo while reducing the chance of him becoming the DK.

I wasn't feeling so hot on damo. Still aren't, to be honest.

One more vote = he had two other voters, HB only had one.

Do you scum read damo then? What makes you think that?

[snowy801]

Ok, for me it was clear it was a progression from my other posts where I agreed with Vecna's initial scumread of Jamiet and disagreed when Vecna said he looks more towny when I think he looks more scummy. But I didn't vote because I hadn't catch up and I don't like to vote before being updated.

So, my vote on Jamiet isn't because he kept calling me lurker (which I have been) but because I already scumread him.

The fact he specifically picked up on me lurking after I started to scumread him (at night he called out all lurkers, today only me) is just another thing that point to scum Jamiet.

Completely follow you on your progression.

Want to clarify on your Jamiet thing: do you believe that Jamiet specifically called you a lurker based on the circumstance in an attempt to discredit or intimidate you because he saw you accusing him as a threat?

Or is it more that you think it's likely his instinctive OMGUSing, as well as him arbitrarily dropping all other lurkers from consideration, points to him not actually caring about lurkers in general and only making a show of it?