M68: Guns N' Roses GAMETHREAD [hidden]

[Jamiet99uk]

@Worcej: Why aren't you voting?

@Worcej: Why aren't you voting?
@Worcej: Why aren't you voting?
@Worcej: Why aren't you voting?

Because I need to go get my ID.

(see what I did there Jamie? )

Yes, you implied that your identity is being impersonated by a fraudster who is using your account in order to pursue some nefarious goal, and who must be stopped by new and tighter laws on voter ID.

I would remind you that cheating accusations are not allowed on the forum.

Razz.

[worcej]

I believe Chaqa is town with gun.

I do not think ghug has implied he has a gun.

Unfortunately for brain I think his continued survival will be a liabilty for town as he will always be treated as highly suspect. Therefore I think he must go today. It's unfortunate if he is town but if he is I am sure he understands and will take one for the team. If he is scum ... tough.

I have most certainly implied I have a gun.

No, no, no you haven't.

Are we at the stages of arguing what someone implied?

[brainbomb]

A marlin is a fish from the family Istiophoridae, which includes about 10 species. It has an elongated body, a spear-like snout or bill, and a long, rigid dorsal fin which extends forward to form a crest. Its common name is thought to derive from its resemblance to a sailor's marlinspike.

Should I take your sarcasm to imply that you agree with foodcoats? that I am in my desperate scum meta where I copy paste long random blurbs from popular novels?

because Im just struggling that bad and im so distraught?

I tended to agree more with PE than with Food - that is, that your initial angry, panicking, hot-headed reaction was genuine annoyance at getting caught as scum not on the basis of deduction or reading, but due to something mechanical.

Can you address how utterly fraudulent foodcoats charge is on me? I wasnt even asking about Eden. im not voting Eden. Why are you defending your agreement with Eden when that wasnt what Asked you about at all?

[Jamiet99uk]

I have most certainly implied I have a gun.

No, no, no you haven't.

Are we at the stages of arguing what someone implied?

I can't answer that unless you can verify your identity.

[brainbomb]

To say you agree more with eden than with food implies there is some truth to food claiming I am intentionally spewing the thread with fluff and filler.

Are you saying you somewhat agree with that reasoning for eliminating me?

[Jamiet99uk]

I tended to agree more with PE than with Food - that is, that your initial angry, panicking, hot-headed reaction was genuine annoyance at getting caught as scum not on the basis of deduction or reading, but due to something mechanical.

Can you address how utterly fraudulent foodcoats charge is on me? I wasnt even asking about Eden. im not voting Eden. Why are you defending your agreement with Eden when that wasnt what Asked you about at all?

I was explaining why I'm back to voting you, and that it isn't because I've been persuaded by Foodcoats's argument, but by Eden's.

[Chaqa]

##Vote EMC

WHERE YOU AT BRO?

[brainbomb]

Are you reading the game, brain, or just spewing?

[snowy801]

Brainbomb, I had a question for you here:

https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3 ... 22#p243822

Could I request an answer?


Re: ghug

I think he certainly implied, but never outright claimed, that he possessed a gun. I don't think any alternate interpretation is really valid.

[brainbomb]

I tended to agree more with PE than with Food - that is, that your initial angry, panicking, hot-headed reaction was genuine annoyance at getting caught as scum not on the basis of deduction or reading, but due to something mechanical.

Can you address how utterly fraudulent foodcoats charge is on me? I wasnt even asking about Eden. im not voting Eden. Why are you defending your agreement with Eden when that wasnt what Asked you about at all?

I was explaining why I'm back to voting you, and that it isn't because I've been persuaded by Foodcoats's argument, but by Eden's.

I also didnt ask you to defend your vote on me
I asked you now three times to say if im thread spewing and if foodcoats looks like town for pushing me with that as his foundation.

I dont care why you are voting me
for the love of god just answer the actual questions

[Jamiet99uk]

Are you reading the game, brain, or just spewing?

Why did you pick out this one post and choose to base your defence on this?

Foodcoats never mentioned the Old Man and the Sea, nor said anything in detail about a comparison between this game and the time you did that - yet you are implying this is the main basis of his argument. It doesn't seem like that to me at all.

[Jamiet99uk]

Can you address how utterly fraudulent foodcoats charge is on me? I wasnt even asking about Eden. im not voting Eden. Why are you defending your agreement with Eden when that wasnt what Asked you about at all?

I was explaining why I'm back to voting you, and that it isn't because I've been persuaded by Foodcoats's argument, but by Eden's.

I also didnt ask you to defend your vote on me
I asked you now three times to say if im thread spewing and if foodcoats looks like town for pushing me with that as his foundation.

I dont care why you are voting me
for the love of god just answer the actual questions

I just did.

Calm your tits.

[brainbomb]

brainbomb, why were you behaving as though you did not read the rules (e.g. knowing it was only town that took 9-11 roses), did not know the number of scum, and did not know why people were making lists of people for?

What would you say was going through your mind as you made each of these sets of posts?

this was already answred above. I knew we learned how many roses were in play. I did not recall seeing how many exact scum were in play. I have been busy and other than a few stray comments I did not skim the setup or even look at exact setup size. I thought HR had sogned up, I thought bona had also. Ive hardly paid attention since it was vanilla.

When I saw large lists filling the thread I assumed they were random reads lists based on activity or mentions. I didnt read

[brainbomb]

I was explaining why I'm back to voting you, and that it isn't because I've been persuaded by Foodcoats's argument, but by Eden's.

I also didnt ask you to defend your vote on me
I asked you now three times to say if im thread spewing and if foodcoats looks like town for pushing me with that as his foundation.

I dont care why you are voting me
for the love of god just answer the actual questions

I just did.

Calm your tits.

I am very calm. you are walking round me in circles answering questions im not even asking. and no you havent adequately answered anything I care about wrt to foodcoats. So do that. answer more thoroughly like your life depends on it. because my life depends on him dying today not me.

[Jamiet99uk]

I didn't read

Not reading the thread is a more significant part of Foodcoat's argument than "spewing".

And here you admit that part.

Hmmm.

[Jamiet99uk]

I am very calm. you are walking round me in circles answering questions im not even asking. and no you havent adequately answered anything I care about wrt to foodcoats. So do that. answer more thoroughly like your life depends on it. because my life depends on him dying today not me.

What do you want me to say about Foodcoats, and his vote for you, that I have not already addressed?

[Jamiet99uk]

This is now very stressful for me because apparently my life depends on answering Brainbomb's rambling questions. Oh woe.

[brainbomb]

Are you reading the game, brain, or just spewing?

Why did you pick out this one post and choose to base your defence on this?

Foodcoats never mentioned the Old Man and the Sea, nor said anything in detail about a comparison between this game and the time you did that - yet you are implying this is the main basis of his argument. It doesn't seem like that to me at all.

Thread Spewing is essentially me givinh away data on my team or having an in thread meltdown where I admit im scum. in most recent examples I spewed a bunch of thread clogging copy pastes into the game to shut the game down.

https://www.mafiauniverse.com/wiki/Spewing

this is coming off of one string of posts I thought were reads lists and i wanted ghug to be wrong. So I got excited thinking he had lied about there being tons of reads lists. he corrected me and I was incensed by his obnoxious atttitude so I rushed to find posts I recalled being reads lists. Upon further investigation I was wrong.

But it doesnt change the fact that foodcoats likely chose this reasoning to bury me because it looked like I was getting it wrong. it would be very easy for him to convince people it was a meltdown like theyve seen before even though HE knows that it isnt.

[brainbomb]

Im arguing his case on me is scum indicative because it is plagued by recency bias with the attempt to paint me as in my usual behavior. He wouldnt do this as town because scum usually need flashier reasons like that to bury a person

[Jamiet99uk]

Why did you pick out this one post and choose to base your defence on this?

Foodcoats never mentioned the Old Man and the Sea, nor said anything in detail about a comparison between this game and the time you did that - yet you are implying this is the main basis of his argument. It doesn't seem like that to me at all.

Thread Spewing is essentially me givinh away data on my team or having an in thread meltdown where I admit im scum. in most recent examples I spewed a bunch of thread clogging copy pastes into the game to shut the game down.

https://www.mafiauniverse.com/wiki/Spewing

this is coming off of one string of posts I thought were reads lists and i wanted ghug to be wrong. So I got excited thinking he had lied about there being tons of reads lists. he corrected me and I was incensed by his obnoxious atttitude so I rushed to find posts I recalled being reads lists. Upon further investigation I was wrong.

But it doesnt change the fact that foodcoats likely chose this reasoning to bury me because it looked like I was getting it wrong. it would be very easy for him to convince people it was a meltdown like theyve seen before even though HE knows that it isnt.

You did have a bit of a meltdown earlier in this phase, Brain.
And, you were getting things wrong and not reading the thread very well.

So, for me, there was some merit to his point - but also, in my opinion you are applying emphasis to his argument that wasn't part of his own presentation.