My experience playing is somewhat all over the place. I would say I started somewhat similar to how I am trying to kick off now, though I am sad to say that I significantly devolved to the sort of strange mix of angry/apathetic toxic mixture which you may often witness in these games. I saw this in myself and sort of took off, but here I am again. I would also venture that I have changed significantly as a person in the past three years.Snowy, what's your experience playing before? You seem to have come in with a very methodical style, no beating-around-the-bush.
My game philosophy is similar to my general problem solving philosophy as a whole - you will always tend to a better solution by considering the problem rather than immediately attempting a conclusion. Many of our fellow players have no issues with presenting themselves to the known wide world, and their actions will not generally interest me except in the form of small notes I'm taking until we near the end of the phase, where I can consider the evidence in full. I will always tend to attempt to coax more pieces out of the unknowns.
I am strongly in favor of being honest to town, against the popular notion of being ambiguous or deceptive in an attempt to deceive scum.
I am strongly in favor of consolidating thoughts to present in a single post, as people's ability to recall and organize ideas are limited and scattered posts are difficult to parse.
I am also more limited on time than I used to be, back in the day, though I expect to remain committed to this game through it's conclusion.
But enough about me.
I see no particular harm in revealing my thought now. PE made a comment that resonated with me significantly earlier, which went thus:Why is President Eden one whose opinion you'd particularly like to have?
Which ringed true to me. Too true, in fact, coupled with the notion I had forming in my head that PE "blatantly coached" bb earlier alongside the idea that the only material (to me) post PE made aside from interacting with people's attitudes is his commentary on meta, and the gun claims in particular, hence my asking.I am getting the vague impression that you're mafia who is mad about being "caught" on probabilistic mechanics votes rather than on actual suspicious behavior, like you got RNG'd out of the game before you got a chance to fool us.
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?g= ... ent%20Eden
I am ambivalent on this topic as it is unfortunately entirely conceivable to me that this is merely a naturally condescending attitude rather than some indicative tell, so it is noted but not acted on. Though I further note that some people [rdrivera comes to memory] are claiming this is not natural.
I don't believe any town should have taken a gun.
)