MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

[foodcoats]

Gg darg

[foodcoats]

##VOTE Bona

[Chaqa]

##Vote Macca

[damo666]

##vote Macca

[Jamiet99uk]

##Vote Bona

[damo666]

Scum are slow to vote

[foodcoats]

Scum are slow to vote

Bona likes ties so he’s probably content

[kgray]

##vote bona

I think it should be him or yav

[rdrivera2005]

Rip Dargo.

I think at this point I can hardly see a team without Macca. I have less confidence on Bona, but I understand the reasons to vote him. I am also willing to vote Yav.

My guess for the scum team is Macca, Yav, one of Bona or Celaph and one deep threat between Chaqa, Damo and Kgray. Right now I would bet on Damo that is holding just on his RB claim.

##vote Macca

[rdrivera2005]

##vote bona

I think it should be him or yav

Explain me again why you are so sure about Celaph being town?

[Bonatogether]

##vote kgray

[Bonatogether]

I won't vote in self defense until the end of the day because kgray is much more likely to be scum, in my view.

[Bonatogether]

I'll respond to people's posts in a bit (an hour or two), because I'm studying for an ap test tomorrow morning.

[celaph]

I'll respond to people's posts in a bit (an hour or two), because I'm studying for an ap test tomorrow morning.

Good luck!

[celaph]

##vote Macca

@bona, you seem to believe that Macca is likely town, please elaborate on that.

[TheMadMonarch]

I've got replies lined up, but won't be able to send them for a couple hours (when I get my next free time). For now, ##VOTE bona . I'm open to other kills, but he's dropped hard and fast.

[Bonatogether]

I'll respond to people's posts in a bit (an hour or two), because I'm studying for an ap test tomorrow morning.

Good luck!

replies coming shortly

[Bonatogether]

Why are you talking about me here? Are you implying I'd push for my team to RB Vecna? What basis can you possibly have for that assumption?

Because you had that whole argument about how scum rb their kills? and you said Vecna is a good player, and all?

I never argued that scum normally RB their NK...? I talked about hypotheticals but I didn't say that was standard. I honestly have no idea if it is.

I didn't think Vecna was a surprising NK based on his reputation, but that doesn't have anything to do with a RB.

I checked and I was wrong about you saying that. However, I still think it's absolute bullshit that that you have no idea if that is the case. You've been playing since m54. You should know how the game is played.

[Bonatogether]

Okay, neglect that point.

Bona let’s solve together.

What do you think of damo’s roleblock claim given vecna’s reads and the lack of an item claim?

If Vecna gave an item to town, they should keep it quiet, so assuming Vecna was not roleblocked, this is the expected outcome.

If Vecna gave an item to scum, either they'd have used it or be holding it to claim for towncred at lylo.

However, the meta is to roleblock nks (apparently - I've never been scum with people who know about this).

If scum has a group of people who know and follow the meta, then damo is scum.

If scum is people who either don't know or don't follow the meta, then damo is likely town.

Since I believe the scumteam to be generally more meta-avoiding people, (barring kgray convinces the others in qt) so I think damo is town.

Honestly, the meta is to RB the kill when a doc is in play. In this setup the only way scum would RB the kill is if they knew Vecna was inventor because they know there was no doc.
I looked at Vecna's post and can't find any Inventor crumb.

I did not know this. Thanks.

[Bonatogether]

I can't even engage with this when you're trying to use this game to inflate your average VT words/day and simultaneously use your words/day in this game as evidence that you're a VT because it's close to your falsely-inflated VT stats...

And you are focusing on this and not answering my questions about why you think I'm scum. Ridiculous.

When did I say (or imply) that I was using this game to inflate my VT words/day? I'm confused.

You said you have two data points after I acknowledged reasons you might exclude the two lower-posting games (your first and a mini game) but only listed one other VT game. So I assumed you were using this game as your "second data point." Did I misinterpret that?

No. I take issue with you saying that I'm somehow inflating the VT numbers, since I haven't claimed an increase in them due to this game.