MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5001 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:32 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:11 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 3:19 am
dargorygel wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:54 am

So you can narrow down who the WW is by who does not believe I am the cop?
Why don't you tell us who it is?
lol
Because I do not know who it is.
I do not claim to know.
But you are saying that the WW is not chomping me BECAUSE I am not really the cop. But how would the WW know that? You are drawing a picture of a WW who can read my role PM better than I can.
WW can try (and almost certainly did try) but will not succeed if you are not cop. Since we can assume it failed, you know who the werewolf is.
You are attributing a reason for the WW not to eat me that is based solely on your presupposition, that I am not the cop. By your reasoning, and based on what has been presented in the room, you or macca are the best candidates for WW.
What? I am saying the WW tried to but failed since you're not the cop.

Can you explain how I am the werewolf?
I do not think you believe that.

You are just seeing nothing but neon lights DARG AIN'T COP.

I have not decided, yet, if I think that persistence is scummy.
I do.

You missed 'kgray and celaph scumteam' in that but yes.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3935
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5002 Post by foodcoats » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:33 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:20 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:00 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:10 pm


It's really hard to say without knowing who the scumteam is...

Maybe we should flip Hamilton now for two reasons:
1. Seems like very possible scum

THAT ALSO

2. Could have been another Day 1 scum wagon, explaining the RHK->Kakarot play.

Thoughts?
Like... the problem for me is... with how townie the RHK wagon appears...

It’s not even crazy that like BOTH Kak and Ham could be scum?

I was just looking at kgray again but like

If kgray is scum

That is top pro scumming
Hamilton first, though. I feel good about Kak due to the gun play as well.
I could get on a Hamilton wagon. ;)

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3935
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5003 Post by foodcoats » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:35 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:32 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:11 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 3:19 am


Why don't you tell us who it is?
lol
Because I do not know who it is.
I do not claim to know.
But you are saying that the WW is not chomping me BECAUSE I am not really the cop. But how would the WW know that? You are drawing a picture of a WW who can read my role PM better than I can.
WW can try (and almost certainly did try) but will not succeed if you are not cop. Since we can assume it failed, you know who the werewolf is.
You are attributing a reason for the WW not to eat me that is based solely on your presupposition, that I am not the cop. By your reasoning, and based on what has been presented in the room, you or macca are the best candidates for WW.
What? I am saying the WW tried to but failed since you're not the cop.

Can you explain how I am the werewolf?
I do not think you believe that.

You are just seeing nothing but neon lights DARG AIN'T COP.

I have not decided, yet, if I think that persistence is scummy.
I do.

You missed 'kgray and celaph scumteam' in that but yes.
I’ve been mulling this over and I really disliked kgray’s EOD1 voting, her insistence that she get townie points for it, and her wolfish leap on worcej. And the awkward defences of celaph. I still have to dissect the her flum park yesterday.

But

##VOTE kgray

(And I strong townread...

Bona is your username a Napoleon joke????)

damo666
Posts: 17420
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5004 Post by damo666 » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:35 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:32 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:23 pm
Food, do you remember the game with the Neighborhood where you had been the lightning rod and Jamie wouldn't tell us his role the whole game?

I feel similar this game, where some things *seem* obvious but I can't quite figure out why something feels off.
Hmmm...

Jamie is definitely off, but...

I mean I can only deduce he is scum?
I have a strong suspicion he is ww

User avatar
yavuzovic
Posts: 2912
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:42 pm
Location: Istanbul
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5005 Post by yavuzovic » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:36 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:23 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 6:49 pm
I had a literal shower thought just now -

Why wasn’t Dargo roleblocked Night 1, but he was on subsequent nights?

Did scum actually believe his retraction, or did they realize they needed to have scum!Darg claim RB?

That second one only works if there is another cop claimant
Another possible reason is they believed the claim and expected the WW to do the dirty job.
I think that sounds more likely compared to the first two scenarios because it's a very safe assumption that dargorygel will be consumed. Later they realised that they don't lose much by RBing dargo so he wouldn't gather investigations.
Did Dargo claim his D1 investigation?

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5006 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:37 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:24 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:10 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:07 pm
Setup 1: 0 roleblocker/janitor (unproven)
setup 2: 0 inventor/ninja (we know this is out)
setup 3: 0 doctor/goon (unproven)
setup 4: 0 watcher/driver (we know this is out)
setup 5: 0 journalist/godfather (we know this is out)
setup 6: 0 cop/stalker (we know this is out)

So we're either in 1 or 3. No one should be claiming to be the doc, but I think it's worth it to put the RB claimants up, especially considering how none of them have been NK'ed.
I am certain we are in Setup 3 unless there is no Town Roleblocker in which case Damo is lying.
Set up 1 would require
1) Jamie lying AND
2) rdr or darg lying AND
3) Chaqa or darg lying

This is so unlikely it can be ignored.

We are in Set Up 3
Is it though? They're not unrelated occurrences.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5007 Post by Chaqa » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:37 pm

yavuzovic wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:36 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:23 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 6:49 pm
I had a literal shower thought just now -

Why wasn’t Dargo roleblocked Night 1, but he was on subsequent nights?

Did scum actually believe his retraction, or did they realize they needed to have scum!Darg claim RB?

That second one only works if there is another cop claimant
Another possible reason is they believed the claim and expected the WW to do the dirty job.
I think that sounds more likely compared to the first two scenarios because it's a very safe assumption that dargorygel will be consumed. Later they realised that they don't lose much by RBing dargo so he wouldn't gather investigations.
Did Dargo claim his D1 investigation?
He claimed a guilty on you.

damo666
Posts: 17420
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5008 Post by damo666 » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:38 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:35 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:32 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:11 pm

lol
Because I do not know who it is.
I do not claim to know.
But you are saying that the WW is not chomping me BECAUSE I am not really the cop. But how would the WW know that? You are drawing a picture of a WW who can read my role PM better than I can.
WW can try (and almost certainly did try) but will not succeed if you are not cop. Since we can assume it failed, you know who the werewolf is.
You are attributing a reason for the WW not to eat me that is based solely on your presupposition, that I am not the cop. By your reasoning, and based on what has been presented in the room, you or macca are the best candidates for WW.
What? I am saying the WW tried to but failed since you're not the cop.

Can you explain how I am the werewolf?
I do not think you believe that.

You are just seeing nothing but neon lights DARG AIN'T COP.

I have not decided, yet, if I think that persistence is scummy.
I do.

You missed 'kgray and celaph scumteam' in that but yes.
I’ve been mulling this over and I really disliked kgray’s EOD1 voting, her insistence that she get townie points for it, and her wolfish leap on worcej. And the awkward defences of celaph. I still have to dissect the her flum park yesterday.

But

##VOTE kgray

(And I strong townread...

Bona is your username a Napoleon joke????)
It was until it fell aparte.

damo666
Posts: 17420
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5009 Post by damo666 » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:41 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:37 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:24 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:10 pm


I am certain we are in Setup 3 unless there is no Town Roleblocker in which case Damo is lying.
Set up 1 would require
1) Jamie lying AND
2) rdr or darg lying AND
3) Chaqa or darg lying

This is so unlikely it can be ignored.

We are in Set Up 3
Is it though? They're not unrelated occurrences.
That's why it's unlikely. It would be such poor strategy (see Yav post above).

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5010 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:48 pm

celaph wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:19 pm


I agree that Bona is a bad DK for the next couple days, but then we have to start considering a bus here especially since he's shown an ability to make plays as scum that one doesn't expect.

Why is like every other townread of me "town cause d1 but maybe not cause he does unexpected things as scum"? Like just townread me or don't.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5011 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:49 pm

celaph wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:29 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Tue Apr 27, 2021 4:21 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Tue Apr 27, 2021 4:20 pm


Alright, makes sense. Probably be good for us to drop reads with degrees of town/scum and then do some pushing around that on D4.
Basically town should be looking at myself, kgray, Chaqa, ghug, and Kakarroto, who have gotten no push at all yet.
Also, this request to have pressure thrown at himself feels really towny. I'd expect scum food to be more willing to accept that he's been widely townread and not call attention to himself.
"Hey everyone look how townie my scummate is"

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5012 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:51 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:33 pm
Oh shit.

Set up 1 is possible if Jamie and darg both scum.

N1 scum RBs me, Jamie fake claims

N2 scum RBs rdr, darg fake claims

N3 scum RBs chaqa, darg fake claims

This means we have

i) a cop with loads of info and would explain why Macca is voting darg (not say I shouldn't have said this, in this scenario I thik darg would have noticed)
ii) rdr and Chaqa are both either town or ww
Cop shouldn't claim today since their results may not be of much use in the current game state.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5013 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:52 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:49 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:47 pm
celaph wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:34 pm

@Chaqa, thoughts on Jamie?
Also, you're doing that thing again where you don't provide your own thoughts, you just ask questions and parrot other people. It's beginning to make me doubt your towniness.
I can quote this in response to rdr asking why I think celaph is scummy.

CELAPH NEVER MAKES READS
CELAPH KGRAY SCUMTEAMMMM

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5014 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:52 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:50 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:47 pm
celaph wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:34 pm

@Chaqa, thoughts on Jamie?
Also, you're doing that thing again where you don't provide your own thoughts, you just ask questions and parrot other people. It's beginning to make me doubt your towniness.
CELAPH WHAT DO YOU THINK OF JAMIE
is your capslock on lol

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5015 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:55 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 6:49 pm
I had a literal shower thought just now -

Why wasn’t Dargo roleblocked Night 1, but he was on subsequent nights?

Did scum actually believe his retraction, or did they realize they needed to have scum!Darg claim RB?

That second one only works if there is another cop claimant
Wow it's like DARG ISN'T COP

User avatar
yavuzovic
Posts: 2912
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:42 pm
Location: Istanbul
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5016 Post by yavuzovic » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:55 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:19 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:43 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:42 pm
I would argue that lots of people are coasting this game.

Bona (at points), Celaph, Damo (until today basically), Macca, Maniac (early game especially), Yavu.

Seriously, why have we not flipped Macca and Yavu simply for lurking yet?

##Vote Macca
I don't think I'm lurking except Day 2, when I was sick.
I also don't think that Macca is lurking for the last two days.
:neutral: I don't know if Chaqa is lying on purpose or we give this impression.
I would say it's just because neither of you makes much of an impression. Macca I have a vague notion of due to their weird posts and catchup style, but I really can't recall anything substantive you've done besides the JavaScript joke Day 1. Maybe I've been unintentionally missing your posts/points, but I feel like if you were contributing anything important it would have left more of a mark.
Meh, I'm pretty sure that I contributed much more than that JavaScript joke. I scumread rivera and macca as a team and maniac for his D1 vote, left reactions every time I caught up and came with theories there and there. I would place my bet on "ypu are unintentionally missing" if you are sure that you don't distort on purpose.

damo666
Posts: 17420
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5017 Post by damo666 » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:57 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:55 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 6:49 pm
I had a literal shower thought just now -

Why wasn’t Dargo roleblocked Night 1, but he was on subsequent nights?

Did scum actually believe his retraction, or did they realize they needed to have scum!Darg claim RB?

That second one only works if there is another cop claimant
Wow it's like DARG ISN'T COP
Are you softing cop?

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5018 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:58 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:07 pm
I hate Bona tunneling darg but have to rule him out for Demon vote.

I’m just saying this to level myself out I guess.
Why did this not factor in your early scumlean on me?

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5019 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:00 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:35 pm
I’ve been mulling this over and I really disliked kgray’s EOD1 voting, her insistence that she get townie points for it, and her wolfish leap on worcej. And the awkward defences of celaph. I still have to dissect the her flum park yesterday.

But

##VOTE kgray

(And I strong townread...

Bona is your username a Napoleon joke????)
##vote kgray =D =D =D

Yeah, it is.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9426
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#5020 Post by Bonatogether » Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:01 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:38 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 9:35 pm
Bona is your username a Napoleon joke????)
It was until it fell aparte.
lmao

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dousing, Jamiet99uk, Kemical, Vecna