MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4201 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:13 pm

kgray wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:10 pm
I still townread you but I'm sus of the way you're handling the Macca thing.
How I'm handling the Macca thing?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4202 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:13 pm

yavuzovic wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:03 am
celaph wrote:
Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:40 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:12 pm
I don't approve Macca kill, they won't be much informative and we have better candidates. Also they doesn't show up after a wagon is formed against them so they are more likely to be town I guess. I don't want to townread Macca because I have no reason, but should we really kill a lurker?
I agree with your first line, though I would rather just get a sub if they don't participate. That said, they've said they've caught up so I'm hoping that they contribute later today. That said, what do you mean they didn't show up after a wagon formed against them? The way that you are soft defending them without paying attention feels icky.
I retract this arguement because Macca showed up! I was saying that mafia would be more likely to come back to defend themselves than town.
Town doesn't have a reason to lurk without something about real life. Even if they lurk, it's unlikely that they will stop lurking when they are in danger.
But the mafia, in contrast, would start defending themselves if they are being voted.
I can see the scenario where Macca is town because they were clear about their absence. However it's kind of suspicious that they immediately came back after a wagon is formed. I made that post in thr quote because I didn't see Macca last night.

And sorry about the pronoun confusion, I'm not used to it.
Why do you think scum is more likely to show up when they're a wagon than town? I don't want to be killed no matter what my alignment is. Why would town care less?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4203 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:15 pm

yavuzovic wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:08 am
Kakarroto wrote:
Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:43 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:18 pm


I don't scumread you because your vote D1 is bizarre, in fact, we were on the same wagon. I scumread you because you voted for HB when RHK/HB were 4/2 nd with your vote this became 4/3. Ypu created wn alternative for RHK, who is confirmed scum.
If my reason was only who you voted for, I would scumread myself as well :/
What do you think of hamilton then? also mafia? D1 he did the same thing as rd so it was 4-3-3-3 (demon - myself - hamilton - brain), in fact, by your logic, rd voted mafia (since only mafia gives more alternatives, right?)
I scumread rdrivera and HB separately. If HB is scum, turning him into an alternative against Demon doesn't make any sense so rivera would be much safer, I would even put him on my townreads list.
Right, but Hamilton voted for brain making a 3-vote counter wagon to Demon the same way that Rivera did by voting Hamilton. Why do you find Rivera scummier than Hamilton for their D1 votes?

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Karma: 8093
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4204 Post by Chaqa » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:20 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:58 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:55 pm

I don't understand the question here
What's at least one thing that you would point to about your play so far that is incontrovertibly proof of your town membership?
I don’t really have any? No one does. That isn’t how this game works outside mechanical clears

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4205 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:20 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:09 pm
What are people thinking about Jamie this morning? I have some thoughts, but I don't want to shade people's answers. I will respond to any comments in a few hours.
I think he's going over-the-top on Macca to make it seem like he cares more about this game than he does, probably because he's been called out for hiding.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4206 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:22 pm

I have certainly walked back my opinion that Jamie is town.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3802
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Karma: 1621
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4207 Post by foodcoats » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:22 pm

celaph wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:00 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:27 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:29 am


If Vecna gave someone an item that isn't a gun, he's as dead to me as he is to this game.
I wonder if the fact that various experienced players generally expect that Vecna would've given out the gun, and that in theory he was not RB'd, and that the gun has not been fired, means we could look at Vecna's townreads and identify someone who might have received it and deduce that they might be scum.
Vecna wrote:
Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:06 am
1. yavuzovic
2. bonatogether
3. ghug
4. macca573
5. rdrivera2005
6. Celaph
7. Vecna
8. damo666
9. Hamilton Brian
10. belCavendishNY
11. worcej
12. kgray
13. Chaqa
14. Maniac
15. brainbomb
16. Dargorygel
17. Kakarroto
18. foodcoats
19. DemonRHK
20. Jamiet99uk

Feeling decent about this, in different shades of green
I did not receive a gun, so in theory it would mean Kak, Chaq, rdr, ghug or yavu is scum with a gun. (In this grand conspiratorial theory against which I hold many reservations, just batting about the ideas. Also possible of course that worcej or brain died with a gun, but I really doubt that - we know worcej was observing his wagon and online before his DK and I doubt brain would holster.)
I could see town with a gun choosing to holster for a number of reasons. Is there any reason your discounting the possibility here?
It's possible, but I think the people who might have received a gun would also be likely to fire it if they were town.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3802
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Karma: 1621
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4208 Post by foodcoats » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:23 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:00 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:59 pm


You've asked me a few questions about lines of thinking that I've abandoned unfortunately. :(
Does that mean you forgot them or you realized they were inaccurate?
I realized I no longer believed in them once I had done more reading and thinking.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7440
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2825
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4209 Post by rdrivera2005 » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:23 pm

celaph wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:10 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:15 pm
I'm not fond of this connection formed between damo and macca.

Going now to drink coffee.
Do you think that scum Macca would so openly follow scum Damo like that? I agree that they're both sus to some extent independently, but Damo's looked townier recently and I kinda doubt that scum Macca would be that obvious.
Agree with this post. I can see scum Macca following town Damo, but not scum Macca following scum Damo.

Anyway, this isn't scummy from Macca.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3802
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Karma: 1621
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4210 Post by foodcoats » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:24 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:09 pm
celaph wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:04 pm
@HB, yesterday you indicated a desire to leave my wagon, yet you haven't at this point. Has your read on the matter changed or can you otherwise talk about your perception?
Just on it to be somewhere for right now. I had a First Post of the Morning that was a reply to ghug from last night where you might find some details. I do think my thought process around role blocks was too precocious and I feel like I've had to walk it back (scum somewhere in Darg, Damo, Jamie, Rivera).

I am troubled by the three that shared the decisive wagons, so that's where I've tried to dig today (that's Chaqa, kgray, Maniac).
What do you mean by decisive wagons? The final DK vote? One was a mafia and one was a town. What kind of tricksiness would you be worried about and think you could infer specifically from those three sharing space on the final wagons?

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7440
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2825
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4211 Post by rdrivera2005 » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:25 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:22 pm
celaph wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:00 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:27 pm


I wonder if the fact that various experienced players generally expect that Vecna would've given out the gun, and that in theory he was not RB'd, and that the gun has not been fired, means we could look at Vecna's townreads and identify someone who might have received it and deduce that they might be scum.



I did not receive a gun, so in theory it would mean Kak, Chaq, rdr, ghug or yavu is scum with a gun. (In this grand conspiratorial theory against which I hold many reservations, just batting about the ideas. Also possible of course that worcej or brain died with a gun, but I really doubt that - we know worcej was observing his wagon and online before his DK and I doubt brain would holster.)
I could see town with a gun choosing to holster for a number of reasons. Is there any reason your discounting the possibility here?
It's possible, but I think the people who might have received a gun would also be likely to fire it if they were town.
Not really. If you don't have a strong confidence on your reads, waiting for a confirmed scum to shoot is a reasonable play.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4212 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:26 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:24 pm


What do you mean by decisive wagons? The final DK vote? One was a mafia and one was a town. What kind of tricksiness would you be worried about and think you could infer specifically from those three sharing space on the final wagons?
I'll come back to this but I am digging into something else right now.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 3802
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Karma: 1621
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4213 Post by foodcoats » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:27 pm

I'll largely be in and out from now through EOD. My goal will be vote within that group of 4 I raised before, with the possibility I would jump on another if none of those wagons materialize and I have to make a choice, e.g. between someone I read town and someone I read as null.

... I guess that all seems obvious, but I was under the same gun during the last EOD and I couldn't make up my mind between bona and worcej, though since I've reasoned through it I should've voted bona, even though I still would not have liked it.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4214 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:30 pm

foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:24 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:47 am
damo666 wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:42 am


There are 4 scum left. That's only 2.
They are the half of the scum team then lol
But please consider this. They don't have scumreads on each other. Rivera said he thinks that Macca should be eliminated then voted for Flum. They didn't vote for each other not a single time. Also non of them were on RHK on Day 1.
I'm usually mean to myself for not being a good town player but I'm more confident about this.
##vote Macca because they're more likely to be eliminated and it will be safer to kill Rivera once Macca flips scum
Don't be hard on yourself about your abilities - you have actually done a bunch of work to convince me that rdr is possibly scum. I still need to iso RDR properly and come to my own conclusions, just low on time. But I feel pretty good that you are at least town, and that rdr may be scum, based on your interactions.
This creeps me out so much.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4215 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:33 pm

Fluminator wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:54 pm
The wagon on me smells like bullshit but I'm working until deadline.
##vote celaph

Something is smelly out of kgray/celaph/chaqa/rdr
You never answered my question about why you were feeling better about celaph. Why are you back to feeling worse about him now?

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4216 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:35 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:26 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:24 pm


What do you mean by decisive wagons? The final DK vote? One was a mafia and one was a town. What kind of tricksiness would you be worried about and think you could infer specifically from those three sharing space on the final wagons?
I'll come back to this but I am digging into something else right now.
Never mind, I don't want to forget this. My peanut brain says the three landed on the same wagon; yes, one flipped scum and the other didn't. If you compare how D1 ended...it was pretty hectic and full of movement. Panic driven and bussing? D2? Seemed relatively more "chill" if I recall. Not true, going back to it, there were a couple of minutes left. I helped make Worcej a lead wagon with about 20 minutes to go. Ghug stepped off to do some flattening. With 2 minutes to go, Chaqa makes the move to make Worcej the day's choice.

Maybe the remaining scum team includes Chaqa, Flum, and Maniac.

At this stage I'd be good with a DK of one of those 3 and potentially Jamie. I am still trying to dig through kgray's output.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4217 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:37 pm

##Vote Flum

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Karma: 8093
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4218 Post by Chaqa » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:38 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:35 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:26 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:24 pm


What do you mean by decisive wagons? The final DK vote? One was a mafia and one was a town. What kind of tricksiness would you be worried about and think you could infer specifically from those three sharing space on the final wagons?
I'll come back to this but I am digging into something else right now.
Never mind, I don't want to forget this. My peanut brain says the three landed on the same wagon; yes, one flipped scum and the other didn't. If you compare how D1 ended...it was pretty hectic and full of movement. Panic driven and bussing? D2? Seemed relatively more "chill" if I recall. Not true, going back to it, there were a couple of minutes left. I helped make Worcej a lead wagon with about 20 minutes to go. Ghug stepped off to do some flattening. With 2 minutes to go, Chaqa makes the move to make Worcej the day's choice.

Maybe the remaining scum team includes Chaqa, Flum, and Maniac.

At this stage I'd be good with a DK of one of those 3 and potentially Jamie. I am still trying to dig through kgray's output.
If anything Day 1 was calm and Day 2 was hectic.

I was pretty against all of the Day 2 options. I was pushing hard on Maniac and I've been calling out Flum all game. You're really starting to make me doubt you're towniness, and I think maybe now you were the 2nd scum up on the block Day 1, probably a more important role than Stalker.

So I'm gonna add HB to my list of likely scum.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Karma: 8093
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4219 Post by Chaqa » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:38 pm

Oh and then you go and vote for Flum... which I do like.

Sigh.

HB, y u like this

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1325
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#4220 Post by Hamilton Brian » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:39 pm

The only thing that causes me hesitation in my reading of you, or actually relying on brain's read of you, is that D1 brain practically loved you. Maybe too strong, but then what happened? Did brain shift, and why? That's what my dig was; I had forgotten in the reply to foodcoats but just remembered.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, JustAGuyNamedWill, Spartaculous and 89 guests