MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22966
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 10172
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2821 Post by brainbomb » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pm

I dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.

succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.

I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.

Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.

Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6208
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Karma: 6416
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2822 Post by dargorygel » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pm

kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:59 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:58 pm
@bona
Please refrain from this kind of comment:
The only other explanation is if you are autistic in some way, and I say that with no mean spiritedness or crudeness intended. I will adjust to your statements appropriately if you are on the spectrum.

Thanks
yeah that was food though, not Bona.
Apologies to bona... Food, that's for you.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2823 Post by kgray » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pm
kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:52 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:48 pm


But I don't have just he one reason for townreading him.
That was the only thing you listed as justification for your townread. What are your other reasons?
A more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thing

Decent VCA from d1

Vecna townread him
We're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2824 Post by kgray » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:11 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pm
I dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.

succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.

I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.

Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.

Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
Maybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 4640
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2825 Post by Bonatogether » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:13 pm

kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pm
kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:52 pm


That was the only thing you listed as justification for your townread. What are your other reasons?
A more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thing

Decent VCA from d1

Vecna townread him
We're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?
viewtopic.php?p=233944#p233944

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2826 Post by kgray » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:22 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:13 pm
kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pm


A more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thing

Decent VCA from d1

Vecna townread him
We're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?
viewtopic.php?p=233944#p233944
Oh, thanks. Interesting that you townread him for this though. It looks to me more like he's encouraging brain scumreading you without committing to it. Also.... compare this to his reason for voting Hamilton. I don't get how that was more compelling to him than this. And can you explain why you think his Hamilton vote was towny?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22966
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 10172
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2827 Post by brainbomb » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:22 pm

kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:11 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pm
I dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.

succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.

I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.

Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.

Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
Maybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....
he didnt say you were poignant.

he said
She’s succinct, precise, asking the right questions. She needs to start giving herself more credit for her play. gl town and sheep kgray. :)

this is now the second time youve credited celaph with doing things he didnt even actually do.

Hellenic Riot
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2694
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Karma: 1333
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2828 Post by Hellenic Riot » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:24 pm

##GM Note:

This thread, or indeed anywhere else in general, is not an appropriate place to theorise on whether players are autistic. Such personal attacks will not be tolerated.
5

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22966
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 10172
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2829 Post by brainbomb » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:24 pm

If he isnt pocketing you hes just scum with you

so thats also an explanation. I was giving you benefit of the doubt but your strange credit to him for things he isnt doing tells me you arent reading his posts and you dont really care

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22966
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 10172
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2830 Post by brainbomb » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:26 pm

I hope im not interrupting you having a shit fit with another player in the game. I sure love watching people tell each other to fuck off.

riveting

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7440
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2825
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2831 Post by rdrivera2005 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:26 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:00 pm
celaph wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:51 am
@bona, what are your reads at the moment?
Townread worcej, for having the actually solid idea that darg had to have read the setup and all that
Townread macca off of vibes
brain - eager but wrong in townie ways

scumreading food, for being smart in a very weird way and dumb in a very weird way.
scumreading HR for mushing his group with Chaqa's? Kinda weird since the groups themselves were fine. If HR is scum then there are two or three towns in the smaller group he named (worcej, RDR, macca)
soft scumreading rdr for just not seeming as sly in the way he did in previous games
soft scumreading kgray just for seeming off-beat even though I agree with her on a lot of things. VCA also isn't great.

not sure:
I go back and forth on ghug cause he makes some good points but then goes and does something that makes him look really bad to me. If he's not dead in a while I'm calling this scum.
Chaqa seems different from his last game, but I suppose he'd be like that in all circumstances. Leantown, but if he's not dked soon leanscum
I dunno about kak. The gun business was townie but asking "oh why would I do this if I was scum i'm so town" set off a lot of alarm bells for me.
This is so bad is so man ways. Lazy and not accuratte to say the less.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2832 Post by kgray » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:27 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:22 pm
kgray wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:11 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pm
I dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.

succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.

I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.

Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.

Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
Maybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....
he didnt say you were poignant.

he said
She’s succinct, precise, asking the right questions. She needs to start giving herself more credit for her play. gl town and sheep kgray. :)

this is now the second time youve credited celaph with doing things he didnt even actually do.
I didn't say celaph said that, *you* said I think my views are poignant. You're implying he's buddying me and that's why I'm asking you.

What was the thing I said he did that he didn't do?

Hellenic Riot
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2694
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Karma: 1333
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2833 Post by Hellenic Riot » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:27 pm

Day Two Vote Count 3.0:

celaph (5): ghug, Kakarroto, brainbomb, dargorygel, foodcoats
Maniac (4): yavuzovic, Jamiet99uk, Chaqa, Hamilton Brian
rdrivera2005 (4): Maniac, damo666, Fluminator, Bonatogether
damo666 (3): worcej, celaph, rdrivera2005
worcej (1): kgray
dargorygel (1):Macca573

Currently CELAPH is set to be daykilled.

You have four hours and 33 minutes remaining.
3

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 22966
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 10172
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2834 Post by brainbomb » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:27 pm

I rest my case on celaph

and my scumreads now include kgray.

that is all.

scumteam
celaph
kgray
fluminator
jamie/chaqa/rdrivera

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7440
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2825
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2835 Post by rdrivera2005 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:30 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:33 pm
##vote rdr
I am completelly sure at least half the scum team is voting me now.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4276
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1329
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2836 Post by Hamilton Brian » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:35 pm

Wish Flum hadn't upped and walked away.

Still want to know why they'd vote damo but would rather give them another day/night for "shenanigans" or whatever it was they said. I'd like to know what possible use allowing more roleblocking BS against town HAVE for town.

And still landing on Rivera, with...any justification?

Anyone else sit in the FLum camp with those ideas?

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 4640
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2837 Post by Bonatogether » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:36 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:27 pm
I rest my case on celaph

and my scumreads now include kgray.

that is all.

scumteam
celaph
kgray
fluminator
jamie/chaqa/rdrivera
I could get behind this

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 4640
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2838 Post by Bonatogether » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:36 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:30 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:33 pm
##vote rdr
I am completelly sure at least half the scum team is voting me now.
So you think there's 2+ scum in Maniac/damo/flum/me? Just to be clear?

damo666
Posts: 17091
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5601
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2839 Post by damo666 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:37 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:36 pm
I dont think of being succinct as terribly towny
You don't know how to be succinct brain.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7440
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2825
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2840 Post by rdrivera2005 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:37 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:36 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:27 pm
I rest my case on celaph

and my scumreads now include kgray.

that is all.

scumteam
celaph
kgray
fluminator
jamie/chaqa/rdrivera
I could get behind this
I could get behind you being scum.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], TheMadMonarch and 365 guests