MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23202
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#481 Post by brainbomb » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:46 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:41 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:35 pm
Seeing the first post mentioning small nails did not explain wtf it means?
Seemed pretty clear to me it means fingernails, no?
what does this have to do with greek mythology or scum or literally anything

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30561
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#482 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:49 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:46 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:41 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:35 pm
Seeing the first post mentioning small nails did not explain wtf it means?
Seemed pretty clear to me it means fingernails, no?
what does this have to do with greek mythology or scum or literally anything
Fuck knows.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23202
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#483 Post by brainbomb » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:50 pm

alrighty

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23202
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#484 Post by brainbomb » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:52 pm

so which was more annoying for you Jamie

learning HR subbed you in randomly without warning

or learning you were scum in a game you didnt intend to be in

User avatar
yavuzovic
Posts: 2912
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:42 pm
Location: Istanbul
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#485 Post by yavuzovic » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:53 pm

Wow you make new pages very quick. Which is good but also annoying.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#486 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:04 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:45 pm
Welk, ok...
My vote on bona I have explained. I thought he over-pushed on the macca defense. But I see that my logical foundation was based on misunderstanding some stuff.

Not sure where to go... I found myself tunneling pretty severely.

Maniac's one post was not maniacal enough though.
##VOTE maniac
I really don't see how "misunderstanding some stuff" is anything other than "I saw people talking about whether scum!bona would defend town!Macca and assumed bona had defended Macca." I get being confused about hypotheticals but digging into this assumption by saying Bona had gone overboard defending Macca with an over-the-top defense just tells me darg is trying to go along with the reads of the room. I don't see any other reason for him to do this?


kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#488 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pm

Vecna wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:12 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:03 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:58 pm
Maniac's post...meh, not significant to conclude town/not town.

Damo? Meh, but points some fingers at brain and Chaqa.

Kakarotto? Hmm.

RDR. Not the typical entrance I feel like I remember from them.

Macca: that opening was weird, strangely enthusiastic, but then descends into book discourse.

Demon: not sure how I feel about the opening. Points finger at Bona but then seems to double down on the set-up.

yavu: interesting start. kind of synonymous with Demon.

celaph: is that some early pocketing happening?

ghug: ambivalent about their start. The vote seems to be nothing more than a placeholder until the temperature gets colder.

The remaining 8 players have posted much more so it'll be a longer read from me, but I'd say there's at least 1 scum/wolf in the above group.
At first this looked not very compelling to me, but I really like your point that "I'd say there's at least 1 scum/wolf in the above group." I'm sure someone else will swoop in and say that's trite or whatever but I actually think that's a fair point worthy of consideration, especially on D1.

Two players haven't posted at all, but I would tend to agree that in the block of "blasé participation" there is probably at least one enemy. I have my personal thoughts about the players in your list but as a heuristic for town to look at today, it's a good starting point.
I wanted to respond to the first post myself with a "feeling daring today are we"

....but then food swoops in here and starts drooling over "how good a p oint it is"?

wtf?

he listed 9 players. How is it at all interesting to assume theres -at least- 1 scum in there? Thats half the bloody playerlist
I especially disliked his pre-emptive dismissal of people calling it out for being trite.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30561
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#489 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:52 pm
so which was more annoying for you Jamie

learning HR subbed you in randomly without warning

or learning you were scum in a game you didnt intend to be in
Neither of these things has occurred.

First of all, I told HR that he could put me in if needed; I simply hadn't checked webDip for a day or two because the pubs have just reopened and I spent the weekend socialising. Then I came on and realised the game was underway, and he had needed me. "Without warning" isn't the way I would have phrased that.

Last of all, I am not scum.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#490 Post by kgray » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:15 pm
no one has mentioned belCavendishNY

I am doubting this player is actually even playing. they didnt confirm and most likely are not even reading. If this person was scum I wonder if someone from scum wouldve brought them up by now.
brain/belCavendishNY scumteam confirmed

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 6299
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#491 Post by dargorygel » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pm

kgray wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:04 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:45 pm
Welk, ok...
My vote on bona I have explained. I thought he over-pushed on the macca defense. But I see that my logical foundation was based on misunderstanding some stuff.

Not sure where to go... I found myself tunneling pretty severely.

Maniac's one post was not maniacal enough though.
##VOTE maniac
I really don't see how "misunderstanding some stuff" is anything other than "I saw people talking about whether scum!bona would defend town!Macca and assumed bona had defended Macca." I get being confused about hypotheticals but digging into this assumption by saying Bona had gone overboard defending Macca with an over-the-top defense just tells me darg is trying to go along with the reads of the room. I don't see any other reason for him to do this?
Or. "I was wrong."

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30561
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#492 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:13 pm

yavuzovic wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:53 pm
Wow you make new pages very quick. Which is good but also annoying.
It's easy for brainbomb to type quickly because he has small nails.

Maniac
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#493 Post by Maniac » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:14 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:41 pm
Why is Maniac the lead wagon?
Scum are scared that I solved the last game.

User avatar
yavuzovic
Posts: 2912
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:42 pm
Location: Istanbul
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#494 Post by yavuzovic » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:18 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:47 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:51 am
brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:02 am


it was yav making a joke but it was flamboyant
Brainbomb is confirmed small nails. Don't forget: 97% more likely. Also his messages feel scummy.
Which messages felt scummy? can you highlight a few
But I did this in my next post. Here

••••••######••••••
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:10 pm

I think Chaqa's post is helpful for lazy people like me, but nothing AI.

Two really weird posts by Damo until now.
This and the first post about falling asleep. Is rivera trying to stay low? Real excuses can be real or made up, we must assume they are real but claiming to be lazy. I too didn't used to read some pages but you'd at least read the setup lol. Untowny vibes from rivera.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#495 Post by ghug » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:22 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:15 pm
no one has mentioned belCavendishNY

I am doubting this player is actually even playing. they didnt confirm and most likely are not even reading. If this person was scum I wonder if someone from scum wouldve brought them up by now.
This reminds me of you being the first person to suggest that kgray had been shut after you shot her last game.

Maniac
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#496 Post by Maniac » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:23 pm

Thinking out loud.

Small nails = Brad, is this a reference to Brad Pitt? What is Brad Pitt famous for? Thelma and Louise, Oceans 11, Friends (scum buddies) Bradgelina. Oh Bradgelina is a portmanteau as is werewolf so Small Nails is code for werewolf. OK but why use this code. Is it a crumb? It will have some significance before the game ends.

Also foodcoats isn't scum, or if he is I'm going to give up playing.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#497 Post by ghug » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:24 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:25 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:27 pm
yavuzovic wrote:
Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:24 pm
Who has small nails? According to a research in 2018, people with small nails are 97% more likely to be scum, can you believe that? :o

function vote (array) {
for (var element in array) {
console.log("##vote " + element);
}
};

vote(SmallNails);
What
is
this
nonsense?
I sort of thought in my darkest most sinister consideration that yav was attempting to execute a script that would crash the bot on purpose to take it out of use. But I also thought that would be super unsporting, and very outside of his level of evil. yav simply wouldnt try to crash the bot imo.

but the joke still didnt make much sense to me. maybe it wasnt for me. I dunno who the joke was for.

Jamie reacting to this seems a little forced since it has already been discussed a decent amount
That's not what someone trying to crash the bot would look like.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#498 Post by ghug » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:24 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:41 pm
Why is Maniac the lead wagon?
Vecna's always right when he agrees with me.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#499 Post by ghug » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:25 pm

kgray wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:15 pm
no one has mentioned belCavendishNY

I am doubting this player is actually even playing. they didnt confirm and most likely are not even reading. If this person was scum I wonder if someone from scum wouldve brought them up by now.
brain/belCavendishNY scumteam confirmed
Stop saying things before I do.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30561
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#500 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:27 pm

Maniac wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:14 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:41 pm
Why is Maniac the lead wagon?
Scum are scared that I solved the last game.
Oh sure. Three scum would all jump on you D1, together, instead of waiting until night to kill you.

Extremely plausible.

Post Reply