MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
jasnah
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:13 pm
Karma: 308
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8681 Post by jasnah » Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm

@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13635
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4457
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8682 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:36 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
No idea what you’re saying

BunnyGo
Posts: 13635
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4457
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8683 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:39 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:36 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
No idea what you’re saying
You’re claiming VT, and so you’re either VT, SK, or sympathizer? And Damo should scan you to confirm?

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 4245
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Karma: 1317
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8684 Post by Hamilton Brian » Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?

jasnah
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:13 pm
Karma: 308
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8685 Post by jasnah » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:14 pm

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?
If there are 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then at least one of the vanilla is town.

What if there's not 2 sympathizers?

If there are fewer than 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then, again, at least one of the vanilla is town.

If there are more than 2 sympathizers then GMs broke their own setup and we can void the game.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 17581
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11400
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8686 Post by ghug » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:16 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:14 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?
If there are 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then at least one of the vanilla is town.

What if there's not 2 sympathizers?

If there are fewer than 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then, again, at least one of the vanilla is town.

If there are more than 2 sympathizers then GMs broke their own setup and we can void the game.
Goons also scan vanilla. As does the SK, apparently.

What agreement are you referring to, anyway?

BunnyGo
Posts: 13635
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4457
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8687 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:16 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:14 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?
If there are 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then at least one of the vanilla is town.

What if there's not 2 sympathizers?

If there are fewer than 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then, again, at least one of the vanilla is town.

If there are more than 2 sympathizers then GMs broke their own setup and we can void the game.
Sk and goon are still possible too

BunnyGo
Posts: 13635
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4457
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8688 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:17 pm

ghug wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:16 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:14 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm


Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?
If there are 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then at least one of the vanilla is town.

What if there's not 2 sympathizers?

If there are fewer than 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then, again, at least one of the vanilla is town.

If there are more than 2 sympathizers then GMs broke their own setup and we can void the game.
Goons also scan vanilla. As does the SK, apparently.

What agreement are you referring to, anyway?
I think she’s affronted I posted some stuff from her ISO and thought she looked towny?

jasnah
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:13 pm
Karma: 308
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8689 Post by jasnah » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:18 pm

Vecna can scan the same claimants to clear goon.

SK join to waive kill several nights in a row? I don't know who besides myself would do that, being a pacifist, but I wouldn't pick SK to begin with

BunnyGo
Posts: 13635
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4457
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8690 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:19 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:18 pm
Vecna can scan the same claimants to clear goon.

SK join to waive kill several nights in a row? I don't know who besides myself would do that, being a pacifist, but I wouldn't pick SK to begin with
Yo. This guy here!

But I scan as not-vanilla.

jasnah
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:13 pm
Karma: 308
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8691 Post by jasnah » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:23 pm

Sure @ Bunny, so you definitely not serial killer, well done.

I'm not sure where you ever gave up on me as alien doing deep bussing strategy, having (I think) caught up with your most recent posts where you seemed to double down on it, but if you've had a change of heart I may have a question for you. Seeking out counsel now that the town is getting smaller and all that

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 21961
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 9991
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8692 Post by brainbomb » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:33 pm

I advise you talk less about roles and more about people.
Do not expect everything to be easy.
start rereading D1 and D2

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 21961
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 9991
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8693 Post by brainbomb » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:38 pm

you dont seem to like anyone jasnah but you are certainly absorbing alot of jargon and concepts from this. Have you figured out how to explain your scumreading process yet

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 17581
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11400
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8694 Post by ghug » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:44 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:19 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:18 pm
Vecna can scan the same claimants to clear goon.

SK join to waive kill several nights in a row? I don't know who besides myself would do that, being a pacifist, but I wouldn't pick SK to begin with
Yo. This guy here!

But I scan as not-vanilla.
I said I would do this at the beginning but that's because it's actually terrible SK strategy.

e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Karma: 1726
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8695 Post by e.m.c^42 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:53 pm

The only SK that would honestly hold is probably me, after forgetting to submit an order on N1 or N2 lol

e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Karma: 1726
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8696 Post by e.m.c^42 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:53 pm

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:53 pm
The only SK that would honestly hold is probably me, after forgetting to submit an order on N1 or N2 lol
(which is what happened last time I played hostile 3P)

Ezio
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Karma: 392
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8697 Post by Ezio » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:56 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:03 pm
CLEARS

Brain Mason
DemonRHK Mason
rdr Cleared by Masons

NEAR CLEARS
damo Vanilla Cop - no reveals refuted, exposed psycho

CLEARISH
Vecna Cop - no claims refuted but no other supporting evidence
ghug - claims vt, confirmed vanilla by me, [and non Maf by celaph], undisputed N1 RB claim

Probably Town but might just be Mafia

Bona - claims vt, confirmed vanilla by me, Day 1 voting

Scanned non Maf by Vecna

EMC

Non Maf scans by celaph

Jasnah
Maniac claims town commuter (confirmed non Vanilla by me)

Claims with no further evidence

Bob claims town PR
Bunny claims town PR
Donny claims Town Lover
Ezio claims town PR
HamB claims holds or discarded town PR
I have never claimed town PR. Where did you get that from?

Ezio
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Karma: 392
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8698 Post by Ezio » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:59 pm

@damo, when you say you can confirm RDR's role, do you mean you have him scanned as non vanilla?
The only way you can confirm RDR is the commuter is if you scanned him the night he commuted and got no result back. If that is indeed the case, please say so.

damo666
Posts: 16610
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5525
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8699 Post by damo666 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:59 pm

jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:14 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:53 pm
jasnah wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 7:35 pm
@ bunny go Has to be griefing surely, can't be this stupid. Even if we consider that there may be two sympathisers, there are three VT claimants already and they can't all be sympathiser, any agreement arrived between three is mech sanctioned by at least one town.
Has to be griefing, can't be this stupid? Not sure what that means.

I think you're saying that there may be 2 sympathizers. OK, I get that. Only the two cards.
There are 3 VT claimants.
Not all 3 can be sympathizers.
Agreement between three of them is mech sanctioned by one town? How so?

That's assuming there's 2. What if there's not?
If there are 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then at least one of the vanilla is town.

What if there's not 2 sympathizers?

If there are fewer than 2 sympathizers and 3 scanned vanilla then, again, at least one of the vanilla is town.

If there are more than 2 sympathizers then GMs broke their own setup and we can void the game.
Or quite simply there is a maximum of 2 sympathisers among those scanned vanilla.

damo666
Posts: 16610
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5525
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

#8700 Post by damo666 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:00 pm

Ezio wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:59 pm
@damo, when you say you can confirm RDR's role, do you mean you have him scanned as non vanilla?
The only way you can confirm RDR is the commuter is if you scanned him the night he commuted and got no result back. If that is indeed the case, please say so.
rdr is not commuter

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 78 guests