Private Messaging Abuse

Message

jmo1121109 · #21 Post by **jmo1121109** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:05 am

As bo said, contacting the moderators is the right course of action. In the old pm system you can also just mute someone. In the new forum system you cannot block someone from sending you pm's. However if this becomes a problem anyone who refuses a mod request to stop sending harassing emails can be added to a permissions group that is not allowed to send pm's at all. On the off chance this becomes a larger problem I will look into phpbb mod packs that prevent "foe's" from sending you pm's.

ghug · #22 Post by **ghug** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:11 am

Who is Drugna

ND · #23 Post by ND » Sat Jan 20, 2018 5:02 am

I don't know who Drugna is, but I saw that Brad mentioned Drugna on the past page and I was just commenting on the situation with this Drugna guy.

Durga · #24 Post by **Durga** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:33 am

Please no one tell him

Durga · #25 Post by **Durga** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:49 am

Brad knows, but ND can remain stupid af and I'll be happier

President Eden · #26 Post by **President Eden** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:15 am

who is Draugnar?

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST

Jamiet99uk · #27 Post by **Jamiet99uk** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:17 pm

Who is Durgnar?

Octavious · #28 Post by **Octavious** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:34 pm

Is this where we discover that demonoverlord was really just draugnar's disguise in reinfiltrating webDip, and after pulling it off has started the process of changing his name incrementally back to the original?

Ha! You never had me fooled!

Durga · #29 Post by **Durga** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:55 pm

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xvZqHgFz51I

Jamiet99uk · #30 Post by **Jamiet99uk** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:41 pm

Octavious, please stop saying D****nar's name. It's against site policy to mention that person.

We're talking about Durganar. No relation. I think she used to be called Durmon Overlurd.

Octavious · #31 Post by **Octavious** » Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:21 pm

My apologies for mentioning D who must not be named. I shall stand in front of a mirror yelling "YouCantHandleTheTruth" until I learn my lesson.

Website · #32 Post by **TrPrado** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 12:54 am

For those concerned about the lack of muting PM's, I spent a few seconds perusing my account settings and found that you can set your PM box to have special rules. Under private messages, go to the "Rules, folders & settings" tab, and under "ADD NEW RULE" you can set "If sender is foe delete message" which means if you add someone as a foe with this rule added, any PM they send to you is automatically deleted.

jmo1121109 · #33 Post by **jmo1121109** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:32 am

I wanted to make the new forum auto change D*#$%#!# to "He who must not be named" with censor rules, but the mod team didn't think it was a good idea.

Aereaux · #34 Post by **Aereaux** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:45 am

jmo1121109 wrote: ↑
Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:32 am
I wanted to make the new forum auto change D*#$%#!# to "He who must not be named" with censor rules, but the mod team didn't think it was a good idea.

Obviously you need to change "That is not a good idea." to "That is a good idea." secretly first.

Wusti · #35 Post by **Wusti** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:17 am

Hey Bo - thanks for the offer, but he has since ceased from sending further messages, so I'll leave it at that.

@ Brainbomb - yes he just messaged me out of the blue again and it took me a day or so to realise who it was. I burst out laughing, threw some choice epithets back at him, and poked him a bit. It was when he said HE would report ME that out of curiosity I put this post up.

CAPT Brad · #36 Post by **CAPT Brad** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:39 am

Perhaps he is mad for betting 150 points in a game in which he lost and that brainbomb was playing and didn't. Serves him right for being so Durga-dumb.

CAPT Brad · #37 Post by **CAPT Brad** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:41 am

* supposed to say so durn gawd dumb. Damn auto correct!

Wusti · #38 Post by **Wusti** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:48 am

No Durga-dumb sounds about right

jmo1121109 · #39 Post by **jmo1121109** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:51 am

I don't really think it's appropriate to disclose who it was on the forum Wusti. If you have a problem with it then you need to let the mods handle it, not disclose their name to allow a witch hunt. Just my view as a member, but I view it as the same type of thing we're trying to avoid by not allowing multi accusations.

Durga · #40 Post by **Durga** » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:54 am

Excuse you..

Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Re: Private Messaging Abuse

Who is online