RBG's legacy
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:41 am
Before someone swoops in to label her a proponent of abortion and baby killing, I wanted to post links to the six cases she argued in front of the Supreme Court prior to being nominated to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in 1980.
Her true legacy is one of arguing for true gender equality and her arguments and case selection were instrumental in striking down discrimination based on gender in a wide variety of law and bureaucratic policy. The cases she argued often were on behalf of men who were just as discriminated against by law as women.
She was a giant of jurisprudence and Constitutional Law.
Duren v. Missouri (1978)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1978/77-6067
A jury convicted Billy Duren of first degree murder and first degree robbery. Duren alleged that the selection of this jury violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a trial by a jury chosen from a fair cross section of the community. Specifically, Jackson County allowed an automatic exemption from jury service for women upon request. While women made up 54% of the population in the Jackson County, only 26.7% of people summoned from the jury wheel were women. Defendant had an all-male jury selected from a panel of 48 men and 5 women. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, questioning the validity of Duren’s statistics. The court also held that even if women were disproportionally excluded from jury service, the amount of women who participated in the process was well above constitutional standards.
Califano v. Goldfarb (1976)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1976/75-699
Leon Goldfarb was a widower who applied for survivor's benefits under the Social Security Act. Even though his wife Hannah had paid Social Security taxes for 25 years, his application was denied. To be eligible for benefits under 42 U.S.C. Section 402, he must have been receiving half his support from his wife at her time of death. Section 402 did not impose this requirement on widows whose husbands had recently passed away. Goldfarb challenged this statute under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The District Court ruled that the statute was unconstitutional. The Government appealed to the Supreme Court.
Edwards v. Healy (1974)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-759
This case was brought by Miss Healy and others to challenge the Louisiana Constitution and Statutes, exempting women from service on juries unless they filed a written declaration of desire to serve. (from oral arguments, no summary at link)
Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld (1974)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-1892
Stephen Wiesenfeld and Paula Polatschek were married in 1970. Polatschek had worked as a teacher for the five years prior to their marriage and continued teaching after they were married. Her salary was the principle source of the couple’s income, and social security contributions were regularly deducted from her salary. In 1972, Polatschek died in childbirth, which left Wiesenfeld with the care of their newborn son. Wiesenfeld applied for social security benefits for himself and his son, and was told that his son could receive them but that he could not. Social Security Act provides benefits based on the earnings of a deceased husband and father that are available to both the children and the widow. The benefits for a deceased wife and mother, however, are only available to the children.
Kahn v. Shevin (1973)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-78
Since 1941, Florida has granted a $500 property tax exemption for widows but no similar exemption for widowers. Widower Mel Kahn applied to the Dade County Tax Assessor’s Office for the property tax exemption, which was denied. He sued in circuit court and sought a declaratory judgment. The circuit court held that the statute was gender-based and therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and held that the gender classification had a “fair and substantial relation” to the purpose of the legislation.
Frontiero v. Richardson (1972)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/71-1694
Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, sought a dependent's allowance for her husband. Federal law provided that the wives of members of the military automatically became dependents; husbands of female members of the military, however, were not accepted as dependents unless they were dependent on their wives for over one-half of their support. Frontiero's request for dependent status for her husband was turned down.
Her true legacy is one of arguing for true gender equality and her arguments and case selection were instrumental in striking down discrimination based on gender in a wide variety of law and bureaucratic policy. The cases she argued often were on behalf of men who were just as discriminated against by law as women.
She was a giant of jurisprudence and Constitutional Law.
Duren v. Missouri (1978)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1978/77-6067
A jury convicted Billy Duren of first degree murder and first degree robbery. Duren alleged that the selection of this jury violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a trial by a jury chosen from a fair cross section of the community. Specifically, Jackson County allowed an automatic exemption from jury service for women upon request. While women made up 54% of the population in the Jackson County, only 26.7% of people summoned from the jury wheel were women. Defendant had an all-male jury selected from a panel of 48 men and 5 women. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, questioning the validity of Duren’s statistics. The court also held that even if women were disproportionally excluded from jury service, the amount of women who participated in the process was well above constitutional standards.
Califano v. Goldfarb (1976)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1976/75-699
Leon Goldfarb was a widower who applied for survivor's benefits under the Social Security Act. Even though his wife Hannah had paid Social Security taxes for 25 years, his application was denied. To be eligible for benefits under 42 U.S.C. Section 402, he must have been receiving half his support from his wife at her time of death. Section 402 did not impose this requirement on widows whose husbands had recently passed away. Goldfarb challenged this statute under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The District Court ruled that the statute was unconstitutional. The Government appealed to the Supreme Court.
Edwards v. Healy (1974)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-759
This case was brought by Miss Healy and others to challenge the Louisiana Constitution and Statutes, exempting women from service on juries unless they filed a written declaration of desire to serve. (from oral arguments, no summary at link)
Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld (1974)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-1892
Stephen Wiesenfeld and Paula Polatschek were married in 1970. Polatschek had worked as a teacher for the five years prior to their marriage and continued teaching after they were married. Her salary was the principle source of the couple’s income, and social security contributions were regularly deducted from her salary. In 1972, Polatschek died in childbirth, which left Wiesenfeld with the care of their newborn son. Wiesenfeld applied for social security benefits for himself and his son, and was told that his son could receive them but that he could not. Social Security Act provides benefits based on the earnings of a deceased husband and father that are available to both the children and the widow. The benefits for a deceased wife and mother, however, are only available to the children.
Kahn v. Shevin (1973)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-78
Since 1941, Florida has granted a $500 property tax exemption for widows but no similar exemption for widowers. Widower Mel Kahn applied to the Dade County Tax Assessor’s Office for the property tax exemption, which was denied. He sued in circuit court and sought a declaratory judgment. The circuit court held that the statute was gender-based and therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and held that the gender classification had a “fair and substantial relation” to the purpose of the legislation.
Frontiero v. Richardson (1972)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/71-1694
Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, sought a dependent's allowance for her husband. Federal law provided that the wives of members of the military automatically became dependents; husbands of female members of the military, however, were not accepted as dependents unless they were dependent on their wives for over one-half of their support. Frontiero's request for dependent status for her husband was turned down.