Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

[bozotheclown]

Letting the judge decide is kinda meh I think. Judge is a shit role since his adjudications dont count for any of the other roles as "lynches".

If we mislynch, we want to do it in such way that it at least triggers the vig id say.

I agree it is preferable to get a lynch to count for the Vig. The scum team will prefer to keep the Vig inactive.

[Jamiet99uk]

Wait a moment.

There is some sense to this proposal. If there is a draw, and the judge gets to decide, then the chances of lynching a scum, even if the judge decides on the basis of very little information, are increased.

What do other persons think of Yavuzovic's idea?

I think this means it's not bad if we have a tie. However, if we purposefully go for a tie it could limit our information we gather from peoples votes and how people react. Also, what if Y2k is the judge and kills our obvtown again?

We do not need a tie, if no one reaches 7 votes, the Judge can pick whoever he wants.

You are wrong.
That is not how the judge works.
Read the rules again.

The Judge only decides if there is a no-lynch, or a tie.

[Jamiet99uk]

If we reach the deadline and one candidate has a plurality, they are lynched, like normal.

[bozotheclown]

I think this means it's not bad if we have a tie. However, if we purposefully go for a tie it could limit our information we gather from peoples votes and how people react. Also, what if Y2k is the judge and kills our obvtown again?

We do not need a tie, if no one reaches 7 votes, the Judge can pick whoever he wants.

You are wrong.
That is not how the judge works.
Read the rules again.

The Judge only decides if there is a no-lynch, or a tie.

I do not think this is correct.

From the rules:
"-Lynch if majority, allow Judge to pick if no majority or no lynch (if alive)"

[bozotheclown]

If we reach the deadline and one candidate has a plurality, they are lynched, like normal.

In this game we need a majority to lynch, 7 votes today.

[Jamiet99uk]

##CALL GM

Who is correct?
Me, or this other bozo?

[Jamiet99uk]

@Bozo:
Read the bit in the rules about a SOFT LYNCH.

Then apologise for questioning me.

[Jamiet99uk]

The Judge rules say:

Judge: At the end of day, if the Lynch vote is tied or no lynch, you may kill a player of your choosing. This does not count as a lynch for Vigilante purposes.

[Jamiet99uk]

TIED or NO LYNCH

Those are the only two scenarios it mentions where the judge gets to pick.

[WarLegend]

##CALL GM

Who is correct?
Me, or this other bozo?

(lol)

You are wrong though. Bozo is right. to Lynch someone you NEED a majority (7). If there is no majority, it is a nolynch and goes to the judge

[bozotheclown]

##CALL GM

Who is correct?
Me, or this other bozo?

I think the description of the Judge is misleading, I think "no lynch" mean a majority vote has not been reached:

"Judge: At the end of day, if the Lynch vote is tied or no lynch, you may kill a player of your choosing. This does not count as a lynch for Vigilante purposes."

[Jamiet99uk]

##CALL GM

Who is correct?
Me, or this other bozo?

(lol)

You are wrong though. Bozo is right. to Lynch someone you NEED a majority (7). If there is no majority, it is a nolynch and goes to the judge

Then why does your entry on the Judge (which I quoted) not say that?

[Jamiet99uk]

In Mafia terminology on this site, "no lynch" is something that players actively vote for.

(Except we usually don't because it would be stupid despite what Ezio thinks)

[WarLegend]

Lynches: The day ends when the day end timer arrives. The day can be ended prematurely with a HARD LYNCH, which will be roughly 3/4 of the alive players. SOFT LYNCH will be majority, and will determine the lynch at Day End. If a SOFT LYNCH is not reached by Day End, it will go to the Judge, or result in a no Lynch


The rules are very clear..

[bozotheclown]

This is also important: "This does not count as a lynch for Vigilante purposes."

If we want the Vig in play, we need to lynch with 7 votes.

[Jamiet99uk]

The rules are contradictory.

[WarLegend]

Though maybe I should have made it more clear, to be fair every time I've ever played mafia you've needed a majority yo Lynch, I didn't realize you guys did it by plurality here

[Jamiet99uk]

I concede that Bozo correctly interpreted these odd and confusing rules. I apologise, Bozo.

This is the most public yet of my many humiliations. It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous.

[WarLegend]

The rules are not contradictory and mean exactly what they say

[DoubtingThomas]

ah, when you beat a lawyer to comprehending words

the feels good