webdiplomacy.net

have we played before, thamrick? Could you briefly describe what you remember of that game for me, if you have the time?

ghug wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:04 pm

Xorxes has a very high ratio of scumreads to votes. Is it people shading a teammate, people hoping others will lynch him for them, or noise?

I was curious about the same. I'm personally holding out for a Jamie wagon which is having similar problems taking off.

TrP-In my consensus hunt, Id rather No-L than Xorxes, but Xorxes over R Ike. Thus, is No-L an option for you? If not, I'll push Xorxes for a bit.

(No-L, Ezio, PLund, Reedeer, Bozo, Xorxes) is pretty much my limit without being very strongly moved by a case.

I'm not fond of the no-lynch strategy.

OK. If you'd rather be seeing if jamie can take off, I'll chill here. If you want to move, I will move too.

We are absolutely not Lynching xorxes today. If he's scum we'll know by like tomorrow. Give him a day to solve the game for us.

Ezio wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:13 pm

We are absolutely not Lynching xorxes today. If he's scum we'll know by like tomorrow. Give him a day to solve the game for us.

This for real. He's not even that scummy either.

teacher2 wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:12 pm

OK. If you'd rather be seeing if jamie can take off, I'll chill here. If you want to move, I will move too.

I can only sit on Jamie for so long, and within about an hour I won't be able to check the thread anymore. I'll give half an hour to see if he can take off.

Wait wtf. How am I the leading wagon. I had exactly one post that said exactly nothing.

So I just caught up on the form after all the IRL stuff I had to deal with this morning.

Xorsex is one of the easiest people to read as scum when they are scum, I know in the two games we have played with him as scum he was caught quite easily, and so far I do not think he is scum.

As I was reading Peterlund rubbed me the wrong way, and then as I continued to read more and more people were moving him to their scum or slight scum reads.

I am going to ##Vote Peterlund

Bozo's non involvement is somewhat unlike him, and could mean he is trying not to get any pressure on him because he is scum.

Balki seems pretty towny so far, but he is one of our better players, and so It could be well faked.

Something is up with snowy. I don't like his withholding information, and barley playing at all.

and believe it or not, Typrado is making sense to me.

(ill be here till EOD, just cleaning my room while I read.)

Teacher, you seem pretty smart/experienced. Why are you advocating something so obviously bad? You complain about Ezio not making the arguments, but it's established that he knows what they are, whereas you seem to be expecting us to take it on faith that you do.

Ezio wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:16 pm

Wait wtf. How am I the leading wagon. I had exactly one post that said exactly nothing.

This deserves a +1

Oh I was looking at an old vote count. I am no longer the leading wagon.
I'm gonna stay on nolynch because for the first time ever it's a viable wagon andi won't have to compromise my reads to fake a scumread.

I'm with Ghug. What're you thinking to gain by voting noLynch?

Ezio wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:16 pm

Wait wtf. How am I the leading wagon. I had exactly one post that said exactly nothing.

A. You aren't.
B. That's why.

The one player I would consider going outside my earlier pool for without a case is TrPrado, because knowing his alignment would help interpret all the fracking associatives with him. Further, I will take GHug and Ezio's comments -- oh hi! -- on Xorxes back to the bank where I know he is quite acute (1v1etc) and so offer:
(No-L, Plund, Reeder, Bozo, TrP).

By the way, yes I am defending Ike. i have said why i liked his content today. But you all know way more meta than me.

ghug wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:14 pm

Ezio wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:13 pm

We are absolutely not Lynching xorxes today. If he's scum we'll know by like tomorrow. Give him a day to solve the game for us.

This for real. He's not even that scummy either.

Eh, I'd say he's pretty iffy. He's been pretty dodgy for a lot of his posts. There's one I liked but he hasn't been too consistent. But again this is why I'd prefer Jamie be our lynch.

teacher2 wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:21 pm

By the way, yes I am defending Ike. i have said why i liked his content today. But you all know way more meta than me.

You liked his one question about the Oxford comma. I did too. It was one question, though. What has he done for me lately? I also repeat my question about no-lynch.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:05 pm

have we played before, thamrick? Could you briefly describe what you remember of that game for me, if you have the time?

We've played at least 2 games together. Both times you haven't survived past N1 (well, you were shot by BB like immediately into D2). The first was like M33 or so. You were Oracle and were the NK. You might have posted a handful of times, nothing memorable. The other game you acted pretty similar to this and BB shot you because he thought you might be PR.

Ezio wrote: ↑

Wed May 09, 2018 8:19 pm

Oh I was looking at an old vote count. I am no longer the leading wagon.
I'm gonna stay on nolynch because for the first time ever it's a viable wagon andi won't have to compromise my reads to fake a scumread.

Why would you have to fake a scumread?

Lynching xorxes d1 is the dumbest thing. We've all seen how bad his scumgame is. It's a good thing he's not a wagon and not nearly up to be lynched.