webdiplomacy.net

The name tags are relevant to me because I have one. Deal with it.

bo_sox48 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:52 pm

##VOTE ghug

Again, rude.

I am not going to be online at EOD. If it is going to come down to xorxes or ghug, I think it should be ghug.

##VOTE ghug

How stupid. It should definitely be xorxes. Maybe bozo is scum

Great...

Don't you scumread me Durga? Why do you prefer xorxes so strongly?

ghug wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:24 pm

Great...

Don't you scumread me Durga? Why do you prefer xorxes so strongly?

Because my theory could apply to you or foxy knoxy but I scum read xorxes independently of factors that I don't know for sure.

Actually, if we think ghug is the roleblocker, we should lynch xorxes on the chance that he's the kidnapper, since the kidnapper could fuck future votes. ##vote xorxes

Foxcastle wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:27 pm

Actually, if we think ghug is the roleblocker, we should lynch xorxes on the chance that he's the kidnapper, since the kidnapper could fuck future votes. ##vote xorxes

Holy scum

I think preferring me to xorxes here is consistent with bozo's focus on the nametag.

bo's vote is the weirder of the more recent ones. Ezio's and Fox's are still shit, but I doubt they're scum together.

What's the scum motivation for what Fox just did, Durga?

I feel like xorxes likely isn't the kidnapper, it's someone who's fairly under the radar or they would have used their ability already.

Would kidnapping be useful earlier?

ghug wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:29 pm

I think preferring me to xorxes here is consistent with bozo's focus on the nametag.

bo's vote is the weirder of the more recent ones. Ezio's and Fox's are still shit, but I doubt they're scum together.

What's the scum motivation for what Fox just did, Durga?

How does it make sense, if he buys you're the roleblocker, to choose to lynch xorxes (an unknown) over you (roleblocker). And I dislike the reason for switching to lynch xorxes as based on a role he may or may not have instead of the fact that he actually might be scummy or not.

ghug wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:32 pm

Would kidnapping be useful earlier?

Why are you asking questions you should know the answer to. The answer is likely no, it clears a town member.

Maybe, but again, if we think they're both scum, and we think ghug is the roleblocker, then we think there's a 50/50 chance xorxes is kidnapper...

Durga wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:33 pm

ghug wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:32 pm

Would kidnapping be useful earlier?

Why are you asking questions you should know the answer to. The answer is likely no, it clears a town member.

It can be used to make sure another scummate survives another day, too...

Foxcastle wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:35 pm

Durga wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:33 pm

ghug wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:32 pm

Would kidnapping be useful earlier?

Why are you asking questions you should know the answer to. The answer is likely no, it clears a town member.

It can be used to make sure another scummate survives another day, too...

I never even thought about it like that

He's on the record as scumreading xorxes though. I generally dislike people choosing who to vote for based on what scum role they think people are, but that's a process thing, which usually isn't alignment indicative, and the roleblocker has no value anymore, so it's at least ostensibly a legitimate argument.

Why are you asking questions you should know the answer to. The answer is likely no, it clears a town member.

It's almost like I'm asking rhetorically because the idea that they would already have used it is far-fetched.

@bo, care to justify your vote? You talked about wanting to lynch on shit that's happened in the thread rather than the mechanics (one of the more townie sentiments of the day), yet your votes for the day are for me and Fox, which suggests that that's not actually what you care about.

Foxcastle switching from ghug to xorxes does not affect the vote if he is really DD. Assuming he is not misleading us about being DD, the vote is tied 4-4.

Sure, but it's still worth evaluating in the context of what he wants.