M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

[brainbomb]

can I ask why you gave a different answer the first time I asked why you wanted to drive me onto sabi?

[brainbomb]

criminology 101 is to ask a person the same question two different ways in a circular pattern and a guilty mind usually has two different answers

[BusinessLamp]

can I ask why you gave a different answer the first time I asked why you wanted to drive me onto sabi?

I don't know what difference you're referring to.

[brainbomb]

can I ask why you gave a different answer the first time I asked why you wanted to drive me onto sabi?

I don't know what difference you're referring to.

you never described it as an attempt to save fluminator from what im rereading this is a new nuanced answer

[Chaqa]

but what if hes scum with one of those people. like flum for example

https://i.imgur.com/411xBCG.jpg

*screams internally*

how is it fucking painful to think blamp is trying to save flum by luring ppl to vote sabi

how is this shocking to you

That isn't why I'm screaming.

That is the exact scumpair I was trying to push yesterday and received a lot of flak for.

[President Eden]

criminology 101 is to ask a person the same question two different ways in a circular pattern and a guilty mind usually has two different answers

as an actual factual criminal law practitioner this is the first time I’ve heard this

[Chaqa]

well you can be lock town for even thinking of this TBH

I unironically lock town pyxxy for this. Y’all can call it easy to fake or whatever, I don’t care, ain’t no new scumbo going back and looking at Lamp’s GT thoughts and thinking “I should try to spin this into faked sus behavior by examining… [checks notes] whether he used an apostrophe or not on a word.” No shot.

This guy is TOWN. Town af even. It doesn’t even matter what alignment Lamp is:
• If Lamp is mafia then mafia pyx is not going back and combing through his teammate’s fake GT message to find inconsistencies
• If Lamp is town then this is not the angle mafia pyx uses to attack a genuine submission as being faked

I agree with part of this, but only part.

I'd agree pxxxy and Blamp aren't scum together

I think it basically clears pyxxy, full stop. Period. Dot.

[BusinessLamp]

But also, this is a game of a bunch of different factors being considered all leading to one conclusion. All of the following were factors:

• Evolving Town Read on Flum
  Slight Scum Read on Sabi
  Friendship with Flum
  Sabi's Antagonism towards me
  Flum's Skill Level
  Sabi's Skill Level
  Previous Town Read on Ghug

So all of those are part of the answer as to why I did what I did, and probably more

[President Eden]

but in fairness we deal with trial level stuff not investigations, that’s more of a police officer nugget of wisdom than law I suppose

still calling a wee bit o cap there bruv

[Chaqa]

im not gonna overly concern myself with if you are scum with flum
or scum with rhk or scum with bona or chaqa or the pope
frankly you just need to go bye bye tomorrow and thats really all there is to it

Have you replaced the Jordan Peterson RP with a Chaqa RP?

[Chaqa]

okay so is the universal poe rdrivera then?

I would rank him third behind Flum and worcej. Possibly about equal with Blamp, tbh.

[Jamiet99uk]

Anyway. I just thought it was pretty weird how Jamie just kept saying Damo's name over and over on D2 with barely a justification beyond "he's lurking, sort of" and "naked votes". It felt like some sub-conscious inception shit.

Here's a search for every time Damo posted "##VOTE":
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... t=D1-&g=73


I'm not quoting everything, just the ones I find interest.

This is D2 -33:02:

##vote demonRHK

~30 minutes later:

##vote demonRHK

Man, all these naked votes from Damo.

Nagl.

It's literally Damo's first vote at all, unless you count (what I consider to be) a joke vote from D1 -45:01 of "##vote karrotcake". This is weird from Jamie.

If you look at D2, Damo also cast an invalid naked vote for Celaph shortly before his naked vote for DemonRHK. I was responding to what I saw as two naked votes from Damo in quick succession, and I hadn't noticed that the first one wasn't a valid vote.

Go back and look at Damo on D2 and you'll see this is correct.

[brainbomb]

criminology 101 is to ask a person the same question two different ways in a circular pattern and a guilty mind usually has two different answers

as an actual factual criminal law practitioner this is the first time I’ve heard this

got it from the show dream killer the other night where he asked a witness the same question two different ways and said they answered the same way both times and they were legit. ultimately the case was a guy wrongfully imprisoned for 10 years for a murder where there was no evidence of him doing it other than a very wacked out drunk guy who claimed the guy helped him
murder someone

[BusinessLamp]

can I ask why you gave a different answer the first time I asked why you wanted to drive me onto sabi?

I don't know what difference you're referring to.

you never described it as an attempt to save fluminator from what im rereading this is a new nuanced answer

i am a very highly logical person with a lot of anxiety, lol. if i tried to describe my thought process in full detail at all times i would explode. I am now trying to give you the full scope in order to really get you to understand where I am coming from and what motivates my actions

[Chaqa]

criminology 101 is to ask a person the same question two different ways in a circular pattern and a guilty mind usually has two different answers

Addendum: some people don't have the best memory or consistent thought processes, and therefore will not always be consistent in their views.

[brainbomb]

but in fairness we deal with trial level stuff not investigations, that’s more of a police officer nugget of wisdom than law I suppose

still calling a wee bit o cap there bruv

https://youtu.be/eH2MG9i5V3s

its on netflix feel free to watch it. disgusting example of the judicial system just upholding convictions because thats what they gotta do

[Chaqa]

Anyway. I just thought it was pretty weird how Jamie just kept saying Damo's name over and over on D2 with barely a justification beyond "he's lurking, sort of" and "naked votes". It felt like some sub-conscious inception shit.

Here's a search for every time Damo posted "##VOTE":
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... t=D1-&g=73


I'm not quoting everything, just the ones I find interest.

This is D2 -33:02:

##vote demonRHK

~30 minutes later:

Man, all these naked votes from Damo.

Nagl.

It's literally Damo's first vote at all, unless you count (what I consider to be) a joke vote from D1 -45:01 of "##vote karrotcake". This is weird from Jamie.

If you look at D2, Damo also cast an invalid naked vote for Celaph shortly before his naked vote for DemonRHK. I was responding to what I saw as two naked votes from Damo in quick succession, and I hadn't noticed that the first one wasn't a valid vote.

Go back and look at Damo on D2 and you'll see this is correct.

Someone should do an analysis and see if naked votes are generally scum-indicative or not. I have a feeling they aren't.

[Jamiet99uk]

criminology 101 is to ask a person the same question two different ways in a circular pattern and a guilty mind usually has two different answers

“Gentlemen, you are about to enter the most fascinating sphere of police work: the world of neuro-linguistic programming"

[brainbomb]

if you have netflix
go to the show dream killer and fast forward to 40:16 into it where he talks to jerry trump and unearths that a material witness comitted perjury

[Jamiet99uk]

Anyway. I just thought it was pretty weird how Jamie just kept saying Damo's name over and over on D2 with barely a justification beyond "he's lurking, sort of" and "naked votes". It felt like some sub-conscious inception shit.

Here's a search for every time Damo posted "##VOTE":
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... t=D1-&g=73


I'm not quoting everything, just the ones I find interest.

This is D2 -33:02:


~30 minutes later:

It's literally Damo's first vote at all, unless you count (what I consider to be) a joke vote from D1 -45:01 of "##vote karrotcake". This is weird from Jamie.

If you look at D2, Damo also cast an invalid naked vote for Celaph shortly before his naked vote for DemonRHK. I was responding to what I saw as two naked votes from Damo in quick succession, and I hadn't noticed that the first one wasn't a valid vote.

Go back and look at Damo on D2 and you'll see this is correct.

Someone should do an analysis and see if naked votes are generally scum-indicative or not. I have a feeling they aren't.

Yeah that's who should do that.

Someone!