first part: excited bona got killed last game for this same reason and was townVecna wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 8:52 amVecna ketchup wall – Its gotta be Heinz or the south African delicious gold stuff edition
Commented on it at the time, but this interaction is pretty interesting after an lfischl flip. Not sure how to interpret it, I remember as bona being quite crazy/fun that time he was scum.
<big snip of stuff that i should respond to>
This wall feels like a pretty big effort to defend a scum teammate. Makes it feel less likely that Celaph was lfischl’s teammate.celaph wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:11 pmI find it interesting that you think I'm pushing back against townreads when I'm doing the exact opposite, pushing back against people's scumreads. I'm not confident in my own, but I'd like people to at least put forward good reasons for the wagons they are on. I was doing just that in 2 of the 4 posts you highlighted earlier.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:02 pm
since are you the one who's pushing back against townreads? usually you're doing something constructive
I'm challenging Kak's ghug/bona scumread because I don't see it.
@worcej, coming from anyone besides lfischl I would agree with you, but my memory is that lfischl has asked a number of literal surface level questions before like this.
I'm contesting worcej's read on lfischl as weird because it strikes me as normal lfischl.
One of the other two posts you quoted was when I agreed that Bob's last posts at the time were weird. I stand by that statement though since then his posts have returned to a more normal Bob. I'm keeping an eye on him, but don't have a strong desire to kill him today. The last one was me challenging lfischl's ghug/Jamie connection. I suppose you could interpret this as pushing back against a townread, but I see no indication about whether lfischl sees them as more likely t/t or s/s.
second part: Isn't 'effort to defend a scum teammate' and 'less likely that celaph was lfischl's teammate' mutually exclusive? i'm confused