Vecna, lighthouse of my myopia (oops, did I mix too many metaphors?)
1) In order for this to have happened the scum team would have to have confidence that ghug was in fact commuting, not BP or 3P, as the BP is not an auto-town clear and not as priority for day vig, and 3P is best kept alive to cause fear in town until later in the game.
The only way for this to have happened is that the item investigator N1 checked ghug and discovered it. In which case, why try to shoot the guy who can 100% save himself?
No, ghug was either watcher or napkin. I want to believe napkin, but reality says watcher.
2) I'm sorry for being cringe, my main man *guitar riffs*
I don't know if you noticed by my uh, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5... every game until now... but I don't like to form conclusions until near EoD so you'll have to deal with my cringiness for... at least another 24 hours, I'd say haiii Vecna-sama-desu.
More like bozo the based, am I right?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:08 amWhy did you silence Macca when you could have let that go unused?
Why did you think Macca was the best player to give the challenge to, if you were hoping to give it to someone with an investigative item?
Jamiet, my main man. Regardless of alignment, not only is this fallacious and blatantly untrue, it doesn't help convince anyone that you're town! Which is what I think you were going for, so let me help you out and explain.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:32 amWell look here.snowy801 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:47 amlfischl is confirmed not 3P. celaph would have said, being town.
He's also obviously not town. It's difficult for me to describe my reads; every time it just seems poorly received (even if it's pretty accurate).
Also why I spent most of my time making up some mechanical sounding justification for why Jamiet is scum, when the real answer is "he real scummy"
Uh, I echo rdrivera on this one. Why did they silence town? Why did they throw the town with worst reads in the game the challenge?
Here is Snowy confirming that his arguments against me were fabrications. Fiction. In his own words, "made up".
I told you that Snowy was just making up bullshit and selling a false narrative about my actions and here is Snowy just brazenly admitting that that is what he was doing all along.
I made this comment with the expectation that saying it will bolster my argument, not weaken it, yes? So you must in turn come to interpret it in that light as best as possible, or others will plainly see that you are attempting to misrepresent my statement which will result them in scum reading you. Everything about my case is based on facts and logic [get destroyed]. I am merely commenting that it was constructed after the fact.
You've done this a lot in this game, and I think working on this habit will assist you greatly. The best rebuttal is taking your opponent's arguments in the best possible light it can be shown, and still demonstrating that it is untrue.
-- just to take an opportunity to brag --
I dunno man, reality just happens to align with my motive reads almost every time. Hard to rebut my methodology when it's so plainly effective.
Also:
I will by and large remain quiet for most of this real time day, as everyone seems invested in the 3P hunt and I think it's better to just sit back and see what people have to say about each other than listen to anyone try to convince town clears on the appropriate choice of action.
Feel free to ask me anything though.
Good luck!
