M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
snowy801
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:47 am
Karma: 1460

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1301 Post by snowy801 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:06 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:05 pm
@Snowy: Could you answer the question about why you suggested Bona had more than one item?
that would be a typo my guy
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1302 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:06 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:23 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:00 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 5:53 pm


If I have responded to your question, and if you're confident you can make the links, then did I really dodge your question at all?

I purport not.
You still haven't answered his question, Jamie.

You've now answered one of mine and not the other.
Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.
I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1303 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:06 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:05 pm
@Snowy: Could you answer the question about why you suggested Bona had more than one item?
that would be a typo my guy
Okay. Thanks for clarifying.
1

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 1067

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1304 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:56 pm
Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.
What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1305 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:06 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:23 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:00 pm


You still haven't answered his question, Jamie.

You've now answered one of mine and not the other.
Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.
I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.
I don't think I've ignored you at all.

Was there a specific actual question?
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1306 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:30 pm
Wait hang on, I just had a thought

Should whoever got bona's items claim, if they are town?
I had this thought too. I think maybe at EoN (or if they get daykilled) they should claim that they got the item, but not what it was. It's super helpful in narrowing the 3P but also obviously makes you a target.

It's also worth contemplating giving one's items to townreads once one is known to have multiple items.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1307 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:10 pm

Ghug is very self important isn't he?
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1308 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:10 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:53 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:42 pm
And why you are not scumreading Jamiet anymore? I find his posts even more scummier. Jamiet town indignation feels natural, this game he looks like a bad copy of this, even him telling he is tryng to play differently.
To be fair, Jamiet claimed he would try to play differently before he drew his card.
He hasn't played differently in the way he claimed he would, though. He just feels fake.
1

snowy801
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:47 am
Karma: 1460

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1309 Post by snowy801 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:11 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm
snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:56 pm
Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.
What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.
Your post seemed to imply that Jamiet calling you a lurker is scummy because you already explained why your activity level is so low.

But you are a lurker.

Which would be fine on its own, but you attached a vote on the end making it seem more significant. Even with the "by the way", a consolidated thought might be good on why you overall think Jamiet is scum.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1310 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:12 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:10 pm
snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:53 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:42 pm
And why you are not scumreading Jamiet anymore? I find his posts even more scummier. Jamiet town indignation feels natural, this game he looks like a bad copy of this, even him telling he is tryng to play differently.
To be fair, Jamiet claimed he would try to play differently before he drew his card.
He hasn't played differently in the way he claimed he would, though. He just feels fake.
I'm as organic as the fresh earth, my dude.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1311 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:13 pm

I am pleased that I have prompted Rdrivera to increase his participation.
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 17274
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 8117
Contact:

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1312 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:14 pm

Now I am going to get off the train and go to the pub. Later, potatoes.
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1313 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:14 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:06 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:23 pm


Sorry, what is your outstanding query for me?

Could you re-state it?

I'm on a train.
I asked you why you ignored my minifesto on you but responded to Snowy's suspicions.
I don't think I've ignored you at all.

Was there a specific actual question?
That was the question.

You came back to me and snowy both voicing suspicion of you, and you responded only to Snowy's points. This is part of what is now a pattern of being avoidant (see again my having to point out this question several times), though as Snowy points out, you've moved to avoiding by being intentionally obtuse rather than simply ignoring.
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1314 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:19 pm

There are like seven people who haven't done anything of note today.
1

bozotheclown
Posts: 8596
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Karma: 1319

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1315 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:19 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:51 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:40 pm
Why did you move your vote from damo to Bonatogether after the previous 2 votes were for damo, bring him to a tie for the lead wagon?
We spent too long at 3-3-3, and I always tend to believe a complacent D1 EoD means TvT.

I was actually going to hop off of Bona and look for alternatives, but nothing appeared and the rest, as they say, was history.
You did move back to damo when Bonatogether and Maniac were both at 4 votes and damo was not likely to be the DK, and you later said this about your vote:
snowy801 wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:05 pm
There was no time for Brian to be a thing. To think otherwise is foolish or disingenuous.

damo had an additional vote and previous noises of support. I had hoped there would be a last minute shift, but there wasn't, so I went to my last resort.
This seems to imply damo was your top DK choice, yet it was your moving your vote from damo to Bonatogether that likely took damo out of contention for the DK. Also, damo had the same 2 votes he did when you left his wagon, so I do not know what you mean when you say he "had an additional vote".

I think your vote movement D1 EOD is consistent with bussing damo while also trying to make sure he was not the DK.

Also, celaph was one of the two who followed your vote for damo, so it is possible he was NKed to allow you to continue to bus damo while reducing the chance of him becoming the DK.
1

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 1067

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1316 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:20 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:11 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:08 pm
snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:56 pm
Will not lie, I honestly agree that is kind of weak.

Maybe it's not fair, but I've come to expect better of you rdrivera.
What is weak? My answer to Jamiet keep pushing that I am lurking and asking why after I already answer this or my reasons to scum read him?

I can agree on the second being weak but the first is annoying and unfair.
Your post seemed to imply that Jamiet calling you a lurker is scummy because you already explained why your activity level is so low.

But you are a lurker.

Which would be fine on its own, but you attached a vote on the end making it seem more significant. Even with the "by the way", a consolidated thought might be good on why you overall think Jamiet is scum.
Ok, for me it was clear it was a progression from my other posts where I agreed with Vecna's initial scumread of Jamiet and disagreed when Vecna said he looks more towny when I think he looks more scummy. But I didn't vote because I hadn't catch up and I don't like to vote before being updated.

So, my vote on Jamiet isn't because he kept calling me lurker (which I have been) but because I already scumread him.

The fact he specifically picked up on me lurking after I started to scumread him (at night he called out all lurkers, today only me) is just another thing that point to scum Jamiet.
1

snowy801
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:47 am
Karma: 1460

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1317 Post by snowy801 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:20 pm

Has Vecna given out a single town read aside from Bob (who is the easiest obvtown to give, and thus more or less meaningless)

I see some positive noise about Maniac, and there's his list (which has Bob, Celaph, HB and worcej on what I presume is his "towny" cutoff).

But mostly he's been looking for reasons to scum read people without really hard committing to it. Thoughts?
1

ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 2412

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1318 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:22 pm

snowy801 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:20 pm
Has Vecna given out a single town read aside from Bob (who is the easiest obvtown to give, and thus more or less meaningless)

I see some positive noise about Maniac, and there's his list (which has Bob, Celaph, HB and worcej on what I presume is his "towny" cutoff).

But mostly he's been looking for reasons to scum read people without really hard committing to it. Thoughts?
Yeah, I'm pretty unimpressed with Vecna so far.

I also like bozo's recent comments on you. Care to respond?
1

snowy801
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:47 am
Karma: 1460

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1319 Post by snowy801 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:24 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:19 pm
This seems to imply damo was your top DK choice, yet it was your moving your vote from damo to Bonatogether that likely took damo out of contention for the DK. Also, damo had the same 2 votes he did when you left his wagon, so I do not know what you mean when you say he "had an additional vote".

I think your vote movement D1 EOD is consistent with bussing damo while also trying to make sure he was not the DK.

Also, celaph was one of the two who followed your vote for damo, so it is possible he was NKed to allow you to continue to bus damo while reducing the chance of him becoming the DK.
I wasn't feeling so hot on damo. Still aren't, to be honest.

One more vote = he had two other voters, HB only had one.

Do you scum read damo then? What makes you think that?
1

snowy801
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:47 am
Karma: 1460

Re: M69: Trapped in the Chipotle R&D Lab [HIDDEN]

#1320 Post by snowy801 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:31 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:20 pm
Ok, for me it was clear it was a progression from my other posts where I agreed with Vecna's initial scumread of Jamiet and disagreed when Vecna said he looks more towny when I think he looks more scummy. But I didn't vote because I hadn't catch up and I don't like to vote before being updated.

So, my vote on Jamiet isn't because he kept calling me lurker (which I have been) but because I already scumread him.

The fact he specifically picked up on me lurking after I started to scumread him (at night he called out all lurkers, today only me) is just another thing that point to scum Jamiet.
Completely follow you on your progression.

Want to clarify on your Jamiet thing: do you believe that Jamiet specifically called you a lurker based on the circumstance in an attempt to discredit or intimidate you because he saw you accusing him as a threat?

Or is it more that you think it's likely his instinctive OMGUSing, as well as him arbitrarily dropping all other lurkers from consideration, points to him not actually caring about lurkers in general and only making a show of it?
1

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests