webdiplomacy.net

Oh Jk we only have one peek.

lol

I'm thinking mass peek of VTs but no claiming might be the call.

How much do we care about analysis telling the mafia the correct strategy? I'm pretty sure I know exactly how to handle gusk/ezio.

A mass peek and claim is def terrible, but I don't understand the advantage of a mass peek with no claim.

Ezio wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:15 am

A mass peek and claim is def terrible, but I don't understand the advantage of a mass peek with no claim.

I think the wost part of this nametag thing is that we are just focusing on it and there is not actual effort to solve the game. Mafia can easily just hide behind diuscussing game mechanics and the likes and we will have to trust on PRs and nametags to find scum.

That'll correct itself for the most part, rd.

ghug wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:32 am

That'll correct itself for the most part, rd.

I don't exactly understand what you meant. Do you think it's just in the start and the game will get going? Or do you think mechanics and PRs are the way to go?

Hi all.
Do you think a player with a positive role should declare it's role?
Also I lost the link of Mafia bot. Can you resend it to me?

ghug wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:44 am

I'm thinking mass peek of VTs but no claiming might be the call.

I'm with Ghug on this. Worst case, a VT has Bo_sox, becomes a target, but how is that any different from a normal d1 or d2 night kill? Sure, they can narrow down options for PRs by one townie. Not a big deal.

@yavuz: http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/front_page

Nah I think that analysis forgot we can't peek repeatedly too. Don't peek yet.

Agh slow the fuck down

Who the fuck cards what mafia want to be

Cares**

Why has this discussion been so useless smh 4 pages of useless bs

I might be a little drunk

But all your bs is still useless. Fuck the set up, we're scum hunting

Normally I do not let myself play Webdip while not sober, but judging by how much fun Durga appears to be having, I might have to give it a go.

What are we supposed to do but talk about the setup before anyone has said anything? At least it's something productive rather than just complaining while providing nothing productive.

Yeah, RT @Ezio. Maybe he plans on following it up with a scum analysis of all the messages so far? Hidden meanings in peeking suggestions?

nesdunk14 wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:57 am

Normally I do not let myself play Webdip while not sober, but judging by how much fun Durga appears to be having, I might have to give it a go.

Who are you