https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1179
Ok then, I'm gonna let you pull me out of my stupidness. Please direct me to the others that were +1 fishing with MORE than 1 fishing post. As I've already stated this is not the case against him that I am considering. I have stated that it is instinct. This is mirrored by many other yet you continue to only slam me for it.ghug wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 pmPretty fucking simple: dude wasn't fishing for +1s. Others were. You have a hard on for him for some reason. That's lazy, stupid, or scummy. I'm thinking mix of the first two.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:06 pm@Ghug,
Just gonna pull this back up but what didn't you like about my explanation for the "+1 thing" perhaps if you were to point out what you didnt like about it I could explain it better.
You don't really seem to be prodding things that much... rather making the odd observation.
You say you find it odd the worcej wanted you shot but not a wagon. If you took a second to read you will see that that it literally THE reason he didn't want you as a wagon.
Currently I don't see what you are doing to either help town or progress things in any shape or form.
Tell me what is wrong with my case against you, elaborate your case on me and tell me where else I should be looking.
I do expect an answer for each point here as well.
I find that logic from worcej questionable. Your belief that reiterating that logic is enough to counter that belief is another point for the stupid theory.
I'm trying very hard not to lead this lynch. Town can thank me later. I'm also talking to people and giving thoughts. I'm not
Idefk what your case is. It seems like it's just OMGUS, which is why I'm not voting for you anymore, but also reinforces that you're stupid.
I do expect you to continue being stupid.
In that game I pushed box claiming D1, which I really thought was a good idea for town.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:28 pmFrom what I understand
- Struggling to find things to say (Vecna)
- Not thinking things through as much as normal (shots/lynches) (Foxcastle)
- Criticizing Jamie for having lots of scum reads early (5/8 in a game with 5 scum) (Foxcastle)
- Fabricating a reason to anchor vote me (Rdr)
Thats all I got so far.
I will note that in MMIV bozo really pushed the hypoclaim thing as town whereas here has been rather silent which off the top of my head is how he won M39 as scum
Thank you for re-iterating what I said at the beginning of the game.
I disagree with about half of these. Namely Cfox, Jamiet99uk, LordQuas, XorxesJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:06 pmHere are my only reads at present that are not complete nulls:
Reads to now:
bozotheclown - Slight scum: Has done nothing but ask questions about the setup. Maybe trying to look involved without giving anything up.
CrimsonFox - Odd newb but giving a "clueless new scum" vibe.
Jamiet99uk - Town.
LordQuas - Scum: Depth-charging and making false claims.
ND - Slight scum. Has been present but avoiding any contribution. Standard shady ND. Also a cultural fascist. Sad!
Nephthys - Town.
Squigs44 - Slight town but that's just instinct and vibe. Need to see more.
Vecna - Slight town but damn he's annoying.
xorxes - Scum, hunting for Town PRs, yuck.
Just re-read that, you retracted that push by page 5. Nevertheless I retract my statement. It was later in the game where your posting dropped off.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:44 pmIn that game I pushed box claiming D1, which I really thought was a good idea for town.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:28 pmFrom what I understand
- Struggling to find things to say (Vecna)
- Not thinking things through as much as normal (shots/lynches) (Foxcastle)
- Criticizing Jamie for having lots of scum reads early (5/8 in a game with 5 scum) (Foxcastle)
- Fabricating a reason to anchor vote me (Rdr)
Thats all I got so far.
I will note that in MMIV bozo really pushed the hypoclaim thing as town whereas here has been rather silent which off the top of my head is how he won M39 as scum
I explicitly asked for +1s in multiple posts. Other people jokeposted, which is all Crimson did. Your logic there is unbelievably confbiasy at best and blatantly disingenuous at worst.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:44 pmOk then, I'm gonna let you pull me out of my stupidness. Please direct me to the others that were +1 fishing with MORE than 1 fishing post. As I've already stated this is not the case against him that I am considering. I have stated that it is instinct. This is mirrored by many other yet you continue to only slam me for it.ghug wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 pmPretty fucking simple: dude wasn't fishing for +1s. Others were. You have a hard on for him for some reason. That's lazy, stupid, or scummy. I'm thinking mix of the first two.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:06 pm@Ghug,
Just gonna pull this back up but what didn't you like about my explanation for the "+1 thing" perhaps if you were to point out what you didnt like about it I could explain it better.
You don't really seem to be prodding things that much... rather making the odd observation.
You say you find it odd the worcej wanted you shot but not a wagon. If you took a second to read you will see that that it literally THE reason he didn't want you as a wagon.
Currently I don't see what you are doing to either help town or progress things in any shape or form.
Tell me what is wrong with my case against you, elaborate your case on me and tell me where else I should be looking.
I do expect an answer for each point here as well.
I find that logic from worcej questionable. Your belief that reiterating that logic is enough to counter that belief is another point for the stupid theory.
I'm trying very hard not to lead this lynch. Town can thank me later. I'm also talking to people and giving thoughts. I'm not
Idefk what your case is. It seems like it's just OMGUS, which is why I'm not voting for you anymore, but also reinforces that you're stupid.
I do expect you to continue being stupid.
I never stated the logic was good only that is the logic that he used and it isnt abhorrent.
My case is that you focused on one post and drove that hard. Thinking on this I am not sure whether alignment indicative. I will stop pushing you for now as it doesn't seem this is going to gain traction unless Ike goes for it and will re-read fresh in a few hours
You literally have an almost identical post in another game (if this post gets x +1s I will....). You then stated you trying to troll Jamie. Yes they are +1 asking posts but there are alternative motives. I have no such meta to base off for cFox therefore I suspect him more for it.ghug wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:49 pmI explicitly asked for +1s in multiple posts. Other people jokeposted, which is all Crimson did. Your logic there is unbelievably confbiasy at best and blatantly disingenuous at worst.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:44 pmOk then, I'm gonna let you pull me out of my stupidness. Please direct me to the others that were +1 fishing with MORE than 1 fishing post. As I've already stated this is not the case against him that I am considering. I have stated that it is instinct. This is mirrored by many other yet you continue to only slam me for it.ghug wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 pm
Pretty fucking simple: dude wasn't fishing for +1s. Others were. You have a hard on for him for some reason. That's lazy, stupid, or scummy. I'm thinking mix of the first two.
I find that logic from worcej questionable. Your belief that reiterating that logic is enough to counter that belief is another point for the stupid theory.
I'm trying very hard not to lead this lynch. Town can thank me later. I'm also talking to people and giving thoughts. I'm not
Idefk what your case is. It seems like it's just OMGUS, which is why I'm not voting for you anymore, but also reinforces that you're stupid.
I do expect you to continue being stupid.
I never stated the logic was good only that is the logic that he used and it isnt abhorrent.
My case is that you focused on one post and drove that hard. Thinking on this I am not sure whether alignment indicative. I will stop pushing you for now as it doesn't seem this is going to gain traction unless Ike goes for it and will re-read fresh in a few hours
I think his logic was abhorrent.
What post did I focus on and drive hard?
Or to put it a more positive way, you agree with half of them.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:48 pmI disagree with about half of these. Namely Cfox, Jamiet99uk, LordQuas, XorxesJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:06 pmHere are my only reads at present that are not complete nulls:
Reads to now:
bozotheclown - Slight scum: Has done nothing but ask questions about the setup. Maybe trying to look involved without giving anything up.
CrimsonFox - Odd newb but giving a "clueless new scum" vibe.
Jamiet99uk - Town.
LordQuas - Scum: Depth-charging and making false claims.
ND - Slight scum. Has been present but avoiding any contribution. Standard shady ND. Also a cultural fascist. Sad!
Nephthys - Town.
Squigs44 - Slight town but that's just instinct and vibe. Need to see more.
Vecna - Slight town but damn he's annoying.
xorxes - Scum, hunting for Town PRs, yuck.
To be clear, I'm not advocating not shooting. I'm asking whether he considered.
That's not one post though, it's been continuous context in the vote you were holding until you OMGUSed me.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:52 pmYou literally have an almost identical post in another game (if this post gets x +1s I will....). You then stated you trying to troll Jamie. Yes they are +1 asking posts but there are alternative motives. I have no such meta to base off for cFox therefore I suspect him more for it.ghug wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:49 pmI explicitly asked for +1s in multiple posts. Other people jokeposted, which is all Crimson did. Your logic there is unbelievably confbiasy at best and blatantly disingenuous at worst.Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:44 pm
Ok then, I'm gonna let you pull me out of my stupidness. Please direct me to the others that were +1 fishing with MORE than 1 fishing post. As I've already stated this is not the case against him that I am considering. I have stated that it is instinct. This is mirrored by many other yet you continue to only slam me for it.
I never stated the logic was good only that is the logic that he used and it isnt abhorrent.
My case is that you focused on one post and drove that hard. Thinking on this I am not sure whether alignment indicative. I will stop pushing you for now as it doesn't seem this is going to gain traction unless Ike goes for it and will re-read fresh in a few hours
I think his logic was abhorrent.
What post did I focus on and drive hard?
The context of this whole disagreement? My response to the +1 solicitation.
Oh I wasn't talking about you saying not to shoot the gun, mb if it came off that way, it was more pointed at bozo. I would suggest shooting bozo but the mad scramble of votes after may murk things up.
How do you not see the inherent absurdity of keeping the first day of a 20 person mafia game to under 8 pages???