I think I believe this explanation. Damo's probabilities always have seemingly arbitrary assumptions baked into them.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 1:09 pmOk you are probably right, the most likely split is 2 high 1 low.Vecna wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 12:19 pmDamo is hunting in the 0 point candidates, being fine to kill any of the three, while he does not try to sort the pool of "5 point candidates" whatsoever, even though those likely contain 2 scum.
For someone that always depends on statistics so strongly, how does he not realize that catching someone with a 1/3 chance is very much worse then killing in the 2/4 pool? Especially considering that pool holds significantly more people thatd be a better recruitment target?
Of the highs (Kgray, Jamie, Vecna, Macca, Bunny, Me) I know I am town and I assume you Vecna are town (if you are scum I think town have lost so I'm ignoring this possibility). Pointless voting for Macca (arguably the most attractive role of the group to scum). This leaves bunny and the 2 docs with probably only 1 of them scum. So, from mpov, the odds are the same. However I do see some merit in your argument so I am revising my voting strategy to the following:
I will vote for whichever of the following looks like having the most chance of being top wagon
rdr chaqa bunny kgray darg Jamie (in s -> t order for interest and for use in event of a tie)
I will not vote for Macca, Vecna nor, unsurprisingly, myself.
So based on current vote count
##vote chaqa
But while I'm thrilled Chaqa is getting some votes, you do realize that by voting now you're affecting which wagons are viable at EOD? If you think rivera is most likely scum you should start that wagon, otherwise you're limiting your later options and setting yourself up to not be able to vote your top suspect. I get joining bigger wagons later in the day, but we've got lots of time left.
This seems like another case of Rivera and damo suspecting each other but not actually trying to make wagons happen.