webdiplomacy.net

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

I might switch my scan since damo's pretty clearly scum here

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:04 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:01 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:17 am

If he scans me and gets Area-51, he's accurate.

This is not the case. If I get Area-51, I am a paranoid cop and useless. If I get not-area-51, I am insane (which just means I need to reverse my scans)

Sorry, yes, what I meant was that scanning me would be a useful result for you. Fair correction.

It would be useful but it is not the best move.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:03 am

I think you are being truthful it is just a caveat to my statement.

I am not worried at all but I'm telling you now the result you'll get so the scan will have no value (until you prove you are insane).

I have suggested you scan Jamie to verify your status.

If you don't want to do that scan someone else you strongly suspect and hope you get non alien. Obviously if turn out to be paranoid the scan is perma-useless.

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

You will only get a positive scum result if you are insane and you scan a scum to get a non alien result.

Go ahead scan me if you like, your result will be Area 51 and you will be none the wiser.

The caveat is just for completeness because what I am saying depends on your truthfulness of which I would say 98%+ certain. And of course I'm not ccing.

And 'whose' not 'who's'.

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:03 am

I think you are being truthful it is just a caveat to my statement.

I am not worried at all but I'm telling you now the result you'll get so the scan will have no value (until you prove you are insane).

I have suggested you scan Jamie to verify your status.

If you don't want to do that scan someone else you strongly suspect and hope you get non alien. Obviously if turn out to be paranoid the scan is perma-useless.

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

Everyone who knows my alignment knows I will scan as Area 51. I am telling those who don't know my alignment that I will scan as Area 51.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:20 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:03 am

I think you are being truthful it is just a caveat to my statement.

I am not worried at all but I'm telling you now the result you'll get so the scan will have no value (until you prove you are insane).

I have suggested you scan Jamie to verify your status.

If you don't want to do that scan someone else you strongly suspect and hope you get non alien. Obviously if turn out to be paranoid the scan is perma-useless.

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

You will only get a positive scum result if you are insane and you scan a scum to get a non alien result.

Go ahead scan me if you like, your result will be Area 51 and you will be none the wiser.

The caveat is just for completeness because what I am saying depends on your truthfulness of which I would say 98%+ certain. And of course I'm not ccing.

And 'whose' not 'who's'.

Yes. I know.

Ok? If you are town, how do you explain your activities?

What's the 2%?

Me say no

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:12 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

I might switch my scan since damo's pretty clearly scum here

How on earth do you conclude that I am 'pretty clearly scum'?

I am trying to help you not waste your scan.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:25 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:20 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

You will only get a positive scum result if you are insane and you scan a scum to get a non alien result.

Go ahead scan me if you like, your result will be Area 51 and you will be none the wiser.

The caveat is just for completeness because what I am saying depends on your truthfulness of which I would say 98%+ certain. And of course I'm not ccing.

And 'whose' not 'who's'.

Yes. I know.

Ok? If you are town, how do you explain your activities?

What's the 2%?

Me say no

1. Good
2. What activities
3. The uncertainty is small but > 0 (you are not absolutely clear).
4. What?

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:28 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:12 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

I might switch my scan since damo's pretty clearly scum here

How on earth do you conclude that I am 'pretty clearly scum'?

I am trying to help you not waste your scan.

1) You have no scumreads to speak of. You have pushed no one. You have been talking but not saying anything.

2) You tried to wagon me by asking loaded questions that assume I am scum. You're smart enough to know that is not how an argument works.

3) You seem desperate to not be scanned. Your argument presupposes knowledge that I can only gain by scanning you. You cannot seem to tell me why, using only information I have, I should not scan you.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:32 am

1. Good
2. What activities
3. The uncertainty is small but > 0 (you are not absolutely clear).
4. What?

2. Asking loaded questions and not having any notable scumreads.

3. There are two possible chances that I am not deputy: that kgray is deputy, or that the actual deputy is still alive but has not cced. We can discount the first one because no information about the deputy had been released yet. The odds were very small that kgray was deputy, and it would be an enormous leap to claim that. The second option is theoretically possibly but extremely low probablity - why not counterclaim? Letting a scum be regarded as the main mechanical investigative is extremely dangerous.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:32 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:28 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:12 am

I might switch my scan since damo's pretty clearly scum here

How on earth do you conclude that I am 'pretty clearly scum'?

I am trying to help you not waste your scan.

1) You have no scumreads to speak of. You have pushed no one. You have been talking but not saying anything.

2) You tried to wagon me by asking loaded questions that assume I am scum. You're smart enough to know that is not how an argument works.

3) You seem desperate to not be scanned. Your argument presupposes knowledge that I can only gain by scanning you. You cannot seem to tell me why, using only information I have, I should not scan you.

1) Yes I have no scumreads which is why I haven't been pushing anyone.

2) Misrepresenation

3) For the umpteenth time go ahead. I don't care for myself because I know the result you will get.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:37 am

1) You have no scumreads to speak of. You have pushed no one. You have been talking but not saying anything.

2) You tried to wagon me by asking loaded questions that assume I am scum. You're smart enough to know that is not how an argument works.

3) You seem desperate to not be scanned. Your argument presupposes knowledge that I can only gain by scanning you. You cannot seem to tell me why, using only information I have, I should not scan you.

1) Yes I have no scumreads which is why I haven't been pushing anyone.

2) Misrepresenation

3) For the umpteenth time go ahead. I don't care for myself because I know the result you will get.
[/quote]

1) Have you not been reading the game?

2) "How did you scumslip to emc" is the *definition* of a loaded question. What else could it possibly be?

3) This is not a response to my question. Try again.

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:03 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:59 am

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:33 am

@Ghug, cut the self-righteousness please. You weren't exactly devoting much time and energy to pushing the Foxcastle wagon. You were a bit of a non-entity most of D2 tbh.

I'm on vacation. This is well established. I gave the right answer on lfischl last night, and I didn't loudly announce that I'd be away at EoD so people wouldn't kill me.

How did you establish for us all that you were away on vacation without announcing it?

Telepathy?

I said so day one? It's not like I'm not participating, I'm just not ghug-participating.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:12 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

I might switch my scan since damo's pretty clearly scum here

Nah, I think he's town.

Don't tell us who you're scanning, just scan.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:23 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

Everyone who knows my alignment knows I will scan as Area 51. I am telling those who don't know my alignment that I will scan as Area 51.

Right, but there's no reason to take that as face value. Bona's out, so he's not that likely to live long enough to get another scan after Jamie. Not wanting to be scanned isn't necessarily scummy if you know your scan won't be useful, but the rest of us don't, and it does seem like scanning an unknown is the call.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:32 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:25 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:20 am

You will only get a positive scum result if you are insane and you scan a scum to get a non alien result.

Go ahead scan me if you like, your result will be Area 51 and you will be none the wiser.

The caveat is just for completeness because what I am saying depends on your truthfulness of which I would say 98%+ certain. And of course I'm not ccing.

And 'whose' not 'who's'.

Yes. I know.

Ok? If you are town, how do you explain your activities?

What's the 2%?

Me say no

1. Good
2. What activities
3. The uncertainty is small but > 0 (you are not absolutely clear).
4. What?

2. should have a question mark.

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:17 pm

BobMcBob wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:15 pm

macca claiming a guilty on jamie is play i would not even remotely respect from scum!macca, and i am very confident in this

Stop and think for just a moment.

Scum!Macca who luckily got the Area-51 pass item *knows* who else is on the actual scum-team and would *know* that I was not scum, so could perfectly safely expose me with the scan claim and try to get towncred for doing it.

Did you think about that?

And then once you flip? I would be toasted.

brainbomb wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 13, 2021 6:00 pm

Macca573 wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:04 am

It is an AREA-51 claim, but the Town who scan like that are gone.

I've actually gotta go now. See you all later!

This seems like if Macca were scum here they got away with freely outing the Researcher which the alien can now kill and absorb. Im sketical that after maccas post 1; they still didnt know researcher scanned as 51 too

After darg's post, I wasn't entirely sure. Bu I was pretty sure that it was true.

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:23 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:58 am

I don't see a need for a caveat unless you're ccing.

Jamie's already been scanned as AREA-51. Yes, figuring out my sanity is good, but finding scum is better. If I scan you and you're scum, then I know my alignment *and* I've caught a scum. It's simply a better deal to scan people who's alignments are unresolved.

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

Everyone who knows my alignment knows I will scan as Area 51. I am telling those who don't know my alignment that I will scan as Area 51.

Umm.... Are you cc'ing Jamie? Or admitting to being scum?

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:37 am

1) Yes I have no scumreads which is why I haven't been pushing anyone.

Damo. We started with 21 players including you, so that's 20 possible suspects for you to consider. 5 people have died, all town, leaving you 15 suspects.

Of that pool of 15 suspects, do you have no scumreads at all? If so, why do you think that is?

Macca573 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:03 am

damo666 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:23 am

ghug wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:00 am

Yeah, I feel like damo should know his argument isn't compelling to anyone who doesn't already know his alignment.

Everyone who knows my alignment knows I will scan as Area 51. I am telling those who don't know my alignment that I will scan as Area 51.

Umm.... Are you cc'ing Jamie? Or admitting to being scum?

Pay attention. Bona scanned himself and got an "Area-51" result. This is impossible if he is the Deputy unless he is Paranoid or Insane.

Damo is saying he believes Bona's claim and is asserting that he is the same alignment as Bona. Thus he would also return an "Area-51" result if Bona scans him.

Do you see?