Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2641 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:00 am

damo666 wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:59 pm
Vecna wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:55 pm
##vote Damo

Actually

(sorry eMC, im sheeping my own weird gut, and HR was also shot over this quite likely)
Have you gone nuts?
There is evidence that Vecna's recent interaction with nuts involves rubbing salted ones on his Vecnis.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2642 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:01 am

Bonatogether wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:00 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:56 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:54 pm


probably lfischl, just based on this stuff right now
So just to clarify your current stance, you are voting your #2 scumread Damo, instead of your #1 scumread lfischl, because you want to be on a wagon you think is less viable than the wagon of your #1 scumread?

Have I got that right?
This is a misrepresentation. I am trying to make it clear to people that I think damo is scum, since people often don't read my posts. However, I will switch to lfischl.
I was not attempting to mis-represent you, merely to clarify your position by playing it back to you as it had come across to me. Thanks for answering.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2643 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:02 am

##Vote LfischL

- Attempting to endhammer an un-counter-claimed PR claimant is bad.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 9346
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2644 Post by Bonatogether » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:03 am

##vote lfischl

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2645 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:03 am

damo666 wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:00 am
@Jamie is self confessed drunk and is the 0ne making the most sense at the moment
I know. A sad state of affairs.

I'm probably still also very mildly stoned.

Vecna
Posts: 11929
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2646 Post by Vecna » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:04 am

I feel lfischl would make for a lot better base-pass scan target in case theres some person that still has one Jamiet.

It really isnt out of the realm of possibility yet that he's just being his own special self.

Vecna
Posts: 11929
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2647 Post by Vecna » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:05 am

(because I think we both know the run-away pile-on potential there is very high).

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2648 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:05 am

Vecna wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:04 am
I feel lfischl would make for a lot better base-pass scan target in case theres some person that still has one Jamiet.

It really isnt out of the realm of possibility yet that he's just being his own special self.
Tell me Vecna, vy ist Damo your #1 scumread?

Vecna
Posts: 11929
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2649 Post by Vecna » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:06 am

He's just around atm, so it felt more impactful to vote him out of the people on my list.

Im also very much in favor of Thamrick and Bunny wagons.

Vecna
Posts: 11929
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2650 Post by Vecna » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:09 am

I gave it some more thought, and I realized the Ghug posts about you being an obvious PR does not make him more likely to be town either.

Its very possible that scum picked up on your innuendo last EoD but still decided not to kill you, as to not resolve your alignment, banking on pressure mounting and you having to claim.

lfischl
Posts: 880
Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 2:43 pm
Location: The area by the bay
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2651 Post by lfischl » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:11 am

Vecna wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:04 am
I feel lfischl would make for a lot better base-pass scan target in case theres some person that still has one Jamiet.

It really isnt out of the realm of possibility yet that he's just being his own special self.
:D

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2652 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:16 am

Vecna wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:09 am
I gave it some more thought, and I realized the Ghug posts about you being an obvious PR does not make him more likely to be town either.

Its very possible that scum picked up on your innuendo last EoD but still decided not to kill you, as to not resolve your alignment, banking on pressure mounting and you having to claim.
Well, the fun part is, they won't be able to kill me tonight either (nor should they since my power is helpful to them), so at least I will get one scan result.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18411
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2653 Post by ghug » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:16 am

Vecna wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:16 pm
Macca573 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 11:49 pm
Unsurprisingly, I have a guilty on Jamie. Considering the Miller's dead, I'm fairly sure in my decision.
oh, interesting
Ick

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30431
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2654 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:17 am

ghug wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:16 am
Vecna wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:16 pm
Macca573 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 11:49 pm
Unsurprisingly, I have a guilty on Jamie. Considering the Miller's dead, I'm fairly sure in my decision.
0h, interesting
Ick
Why are you going back to this, now, Ghug?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18411
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2655 Post by ghug » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:20 am

worcej wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:44 pm
jasnah wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 8:44 am
I consider not cc'ing to be anti-town, not overwhelmingly so given the lack of protective role in this setup, but anti-town nonetheless.

Not cc'ing now and being allowed to cc later is a great way to give mafia late game claim space and run a large risk of DK'ing a town PR because our shits and giggles wanted to YOLO in on the prospect of another hidden PR.

Also, Jamie's only choice wasn't to claim AR, he could as easily have claimed to have been gently visited last night by Man in Black, which isn't particularly farfetched when he was one of the main accused yesterday.

If there's real AR and they aren't cc'ing, Jamie lives and gets to be semi-clear.
Pretty accurate assessment right here. Assuming Jamie was scum, the real AR would and should immediately.

Quick glance at the bot's votes indicate a CC hasn't come, so it's safe to say (and the most likely case) that Jamie is the AR.
I don't think it's necessarily true that they need to claim immediately, but it's not worth even considering Jamie as scum unless there's a CC at some point.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23148
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2656 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:23 am

##vote damo

damo666
Posts: 17377
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2657 Post by damo666 » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:24 am

brainbomb wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:23 am
##vote damo
lol

Vecna
Posts: 11929
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2658 Post by Vecna » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:27 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:17 am
ghug wrote:
Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:16 am
Vecna wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:16 pm


0h, interesting
Ick
Why are you going back to this, now, Ghug?
Theyre probably panicking in scumchat and trying to dig up all the dirt

(I know this is unlikely, but I felt like saying it regardlesS)

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18411
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2659 Post by ghug » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:27 am

worcej wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:59 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:58 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 1:06 am


##CALL GM: Does "several" in the flavor text mean that it is possible that more people died than were announced in the EON1 post?
"Several" meant more than one. 2 folk died. As reported. Nothing is hidden here.
sev·er·al
/ˈsev(ə)rəl/
determiner · pronoun
1. more than two but not many.
"the author of several books"
I'm all for ND-bashing, but can we keep it to the substantive complaints? Several meaning two is definitely not so far out of anyone's idiolect that we can't understand it, and the GM has clarified that there were indeed two deaths.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11717
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#2660 Post by worcej » Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:30 am

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:56 pm
worcej wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:27 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:58 pm


Why are you guys voting me then? I'm firmly town. There's no possible way there's any kind of scan on me. There's no possible mechanical information on me. There's no scumslip. There's no VCA tying me to scum, or even probable scum, or even possible scum. THERE IS NO CASE.
The case is baked into how you're responding to people pushing at you. It's how you're reacting.
:|
You make a face, but I was just letting you know your 'defense' isn't helping you. You're being difficult as people ask you things and are not convincing me of your alignment.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FlaviusAetius, Kakarroto, sweetandcool