Page 88 of 149

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:06 am
by Vaporwave
emc, time to update your scheme picture

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:06 am
by xorxes
Vaporwave wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:04 am
so Ezio claimed prime minister

Attorney claimed party cop

and I'm leader of opposition

3 confirmed, if you are 1 of these mentioned, speak up or accept this reality
Attorney retracted his claim. Party Cop should definitely NOT out himself.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:07 am
by Durga
i'm genuinely confused. why are you lynched attorney

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
by xorxes
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
by Durga
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
how??

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:09 am
by xorxes
Durga wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:07 am
i'm genuinely confused. why are you lynched attorney
Why are poeple not reading the thread?

Attorney is now claiming that his conservative claim was false.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:09 am
by Vaporwave
what? this is 2nd time he retracts something

claimed conservative, for a comedic feel retracted and called himself non-con

now he comes out as party cop and backs away from his claim?

his tone is weird, what he posts feels manufactured

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:11 am
by Vaporwave
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
that's because I really don't get a thing of what this dude says

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:11 am
by xorxes
Durga wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
how??
He retracted his conservative claim, arguing that he had claimed conservative just to confuse Mafia, which is a pretty obvious lie, given that that part of the plan came after his original claim.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
by Foxcastle
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:15 am
by Foxcastle
##VOTE ATTORNEY

My original choice Day 1 gets a second go, now that he's besmirched himself even further.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:15 am
by xorxes
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.
The only real use of his apointee is to confirm his claim, which he must do even if he is scum because if he doesn't he pretty much gives himself away.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:16 am
by Ezio
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.
nah just wanted to give it to the person I thought was least likely to be the NK. I don't think mafia ever have NK'd the competing wagon N1.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am
by xorxes
It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:18 am
by Ezio
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am
It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.
Exactly. Targeting scum seems optimal. Rivera was nice b/c even if he's not scum he still would never get Nk'd.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:19 am
by Durga
Ezio wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:18 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am
It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.
Exactly. Targeting scum seems optimal. Rivera was nice b/c even if he's not scum he still would never get Nk'd.
no scum is dumb enough not to confirm.... :?

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:19 am
by Jamiet99uk
VOTE COUNT 2.1

Foxcastle (2) - Worcej, Attorney
Attorney (2) - Xorxes, Foxcastle
RagingIke (1) - Flash
Flash (1) - Squigs
Nephthys (1) - Ezio

Currently NOBODY is set to be lynched.

We're less than two hours into D2.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:22 am
by Ezio
I'd much rather leave Attorney for today and let cop scan him tonight to confirm him or not. Godfather is not immune to the party cop (he still comes as conservative), so if Attorney is lying now he's guaranteed lynch later.

Neph should hang today.

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:23 am
by Ezio
Last night, Vecna had a similar reaction to Neph after his reads post.

"
Surprised you(Neph) didnt question my(Venca) defending of brainbomb in the slightest. If anyone put in the most effort to divert the lynch from him, surely it has to have been me?
"
-Vecna

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:25 am
by Ezio
@xorxes
@Durga
@squigs
@tom

y'all are the ones who get people lynched around these parts, therefore you're the ones I need to convince. How are you feeling about Neph.