https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5154
OkJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:04 pmYou should go back and read the last 8 or so pages of day 1. Like, genuinely go read it.
Amusing. You’re both rightworcej wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 6:36 pmFine?
I don't agree with your don't agree.
lol. Sweet and Brian were the examples. But in general I think worcej is correctJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 6:37 pmNevermind I agree I guess sweet is just the exception.
D&W post and ghug’s response is scum points for Dipghug wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 6:46 pmKak's not really pinging me anymore. I see straightforward attempts to digest and analyze new information.Diplomacy&Warfare wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:54 pmYou have been arguing with brain for the last 10 pages. Also, I messed up one of the quotes I cited above by removing some of the context. My bad. Here is the full quote:Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:01 am
This is better work and I appreciate you putting in effort. You are however jumping to conclusions.
I did not imply that Brainbomb was not on my team.
Your option C is the closest to the right answer.This kind of implies brain is not on your team. Combined with the extensive amount of arguing against everything brain said, this made me think you thought brain was mafia.Hmm. Interesting. So you think will is mafia, and judging by your other quote, probably not brain as well? That's possible. Will could be instigating an argument.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:10 am
I do not hate you. I don't even know who you are. Don't be so self-obsessed.
Active posting from Will is not a towntell. He actively posted in his recent, very high-performance, scum game.
##UNEND
ghug, what's your opinion on kak and rdr? Townleans or mafialeans?
kak, what's your opinion on ghug and rdr? Townleans or mafialeans?
rdr, what's your opinion on ghug and kak? Townleans or mafialeans?
rd still hasn't done anything notable and I'm always in favor of killing him once the player count gets into single digits (7 now).
Kak and rd both gave partial answers to these questions shortly before you asked them. Why did you feel the need to ask again?
Yarp. Listen to ghug againghug wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 7:02 pmI get the vibe that Will is really trying to solve here, he's just bad at it. This is a vibe I did not get last game, which I should have listened to more.
brain's pushes on me and Jamie are much more suspect in my mind. Much less Charlie at the whiteboard with the string and the pictures and much more agendaed consistency than I'm used to.
Yes. This is what I’m seeing today tooghug wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:16 pmI believe you're capable of fabricating a single read in your style. I don't believe that you're overall performance is one of someone who is paranoid and willing to try on theories the way you normally do.brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:13 pmEvidence of your inconsistent approach
ghug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 6:37 pm
I don't think that's an accurate assessment of how I read Jamie. I think he's a good scum player who isn't especially prone to those sorts of mistakes. It's more tone, motive, and emotion that I look for to read Jamie.
I think he's more likely to be scum here than you or Will, but more because he provoked y'all with the seven thing and then was very level-headed in responding. My mind immediately jumped to the conclusion that he was being silly when he made the seven comment. I think y'all are making a mountain out of a molehill.
It seems to me that you found my scumread of Jamie incredibly charlie at the whiteboard, super farfetched, illogical and out of sync with reality. The fact I pushed it hard also seemed to be why you were townreading me.
So, when I stopped pushing Jamie and started pushing you, why are you including Jamie push in with your reasoning-when you found the Jamie reasoning too tinfoil to be legitimate in the first place.
This seems to be an inconsistent stance
ToneJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:19 pmHow come brain and I can come to similar conclusions yet brain is scumread for it and I’m just trying to solve
Jamie edited a post AGAIN?!
This Jamie thing?brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 10:00 pmDiplomacy&Warfare wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:00 pmFrankly the only thing someone has said that hasn't been contradicted by someone else is that Jamiet hates me. Speaking of which, Jamiet hates me because while everyone else joked around and made useless posts, I joked around and wrote useless posts (endvotes only go through if most of the players endvote the same result. No-kill isn't going to get 5 hammer votes) .Why did you take this so personally that jamie found you scum for such minor things?Either Jamiet is a town who decided to argue with two people who I, frankly, townread, and also vote me, then campaign against me because I used no-vote as a placeholder so I didn't forget to vote and get modkilled, and endvoted as a joke, none of which which a skilled player like Jamiet is likely to do as town; OR jamiet is scum. Take your guess.
##VOTE JAMIET
I don’t recall town!brain being this insipid and annoying
Hmm. You were town that game. You were also ACTING TO GET A READ. Very different. Notice how the same behavior comes off differently in context?
Hmm. I don’t think I know how to read kak here.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 10:29 pmAlso, I've looked at the first 35 pages of that game, and I think you can't really compare that d&w there to this one. Where there was a void of posts and people talking about d&w in that game, in this, it feels more d&w gets ignored and the posts d&w makes feel bleargh or pushy. There was an endvote in both, sure, but those are vastly different, this one here was close to ending jamie's game, where in the m85 you gave, was just an emphasis on a second tier wagon without any real consequences.
Uhhhh