webdiplomacy.net

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:46 pm

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:45 pm

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:43 pm

At this time I note Jamiet has left without stating his reason for scum reading ghug. A convenient timing? Time will tell.



Bona! On what grounds would you state that worcej's few initial posting does not already feel scummy? Does any of his comments stand out as towny to you?

no

it feels like normal worcej!posting

if you can read this i lost the game

How would you characterize "normal worcej" based on your history with him, and how do you think his overall posting fits this model?

Vecna wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:33 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:58 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:46 pm

Hello.

I am in London for three days of work related meetings so I'll mostly be checking in from my phone. I promise to contribute as much as I can, and to remain relatively civil and calm (for a given value of same).

WHERE ARE YOU HIDING JAMIE?!?!?!

WHO IS THIS IMPOSTER?!?!?!

Worcej already feeling pretty scummy with just his few initial posting.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:58 pm

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:46 pm

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:45 pm

no

it feels like normal worcej!posting

if you can read this i lost the game

How would you characterize "normal worcej" based on your history with him, and how do you think his overall posting fits this model?

normal worcej gets into dumb arguments

i cant remember what worcej has done so far but it felt like that

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:57 pm

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:46 pm

Also Bona I do believe you are not supposed to have a signature while M69 is ongoing.

I don't have a signature?

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:02 am

Vecna wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:33 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:58 pm

WHERE ARE YOU HIDING JAMIE?!?!?!

WHO IS THIS IMPOSTER?!?!?!

Worcej already feeling pretty scummy with just his few initial posting.

Possible, and Jamie could be his teammate.

I think worcej and Jamie are my top scum suspects after snowy.

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:03 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:58 pm

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:46 pm

How would you characterize "normal worcej" based on your history with him, and how do you think his overall posting fits this model?

normal worcej gets into dumb arguments

i cant remember what worcej has done so far but it felt like that

Who is he arguing with?

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:04 am

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:57 pm

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:46 pm

Also Bona I do believe you are not supposed to have a signature while M69 is ongoing.

I don't have a signature?

Maybe he is referring to your "hidden" text. It shows up on the bot.

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:05 am

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:02 am

Vecna wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:33 pm

Worcej already feeling pretty scummy with just his few initial posting.

Possible, and Jamie could be his teammate.

I think worcej and Jamie are my top scum suspects after snowy.

Although it is possible none of the mafia have posted yet.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:07 am

I did think the hidden text was a signature.

I think, perhaps, such text ought not be allowed, even if yours is clearly just a joke such potential for hidden signalling is why signatures are banned, after all.

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

I changed my mind, I think it would be advantageous for town to mass claim items, because I think we would have a high probability of catching the 3P before he gets his required items. However, I am confident that it would be impossible to get a consensus on this.

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:07 am

I did think the hidden text was a signature.

I think, perhaps, such text ought not be allowed, even if yours is clearly just a joke such potential for hidden signalling is why signatures are banned, after all.

it's not that hidden? you saw it on the bot

Bonatogether wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:07 am

I did think the hidden text was a signature.

I think, perhaps, such text ought not be allowed, even if yours is clearly just a joke such potential for hidden signalling is why signatures are banned, after all.

it's not that hidden? you saw it on the bot

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

I changed my mind, I think it would be advantageous for town to mass claim items, because I think we would have a high probability of catching the 3P before he gets his required items. However, I am confident that it would be impossible to get a consensus on this.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:13 am

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

I changed my mind, I think it would be advantageous for town to mass claim items, because I think we would have a high probability of catching the 3P before he gets his required items. However, I am confident that it would be impossible to get a consensus on this.

How does catching the 3P advantage town? Game rule states nothing about town losing when 3P wins, so far as I could tell.

If I missed something, please elaborate on how mass claims helps us catch 3P, as I am stupid and do not understand.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:16 am

Also, I did not see it on the bot, and I just checked to confirm that it is equally hidden on the bot.

I have no interest in quoting every single post to ensure nobody's hiding messages.

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:19 am

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:13 am

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:09 am

I changed my mind, I think it would be advantageous for town to mass claim items, because I think we would have a high probability of catching the 3P before he gets his required items. However, I am confident that it would be impossible to get a consensus on this.

How does catching the 3P advantage town? Game rule states nothing about town losing when 3P wins, so far as I could tell.

If I missed something, please elaborate on how mass claims helps us catch 3P, as I am stupid and do not understand.

If the town does not lose if the 3P wins, there is less risk in the town mass claiming items, but the town needs to eliminate the 3P to win.

Mass claiming items helps catch the 3P because there are only 10 items the 3P can be holding.

snowy801 wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:16 am

Also, I did not see it on the bot, and I just checked to confirm that it is equally hidden on the bot.

I have no interest in quoting every single post to ensure nobody's hiding messages.