South Korean Teenagers Detained Over Deepfake Sexual Images
Forum rules
Feel free to discuss any topics here. Please use the Politics sub-forum for political conversations. While most topics will be allowed please be sure to be respectful and follow our normal site rules at http://www.webdiplomacy.net/rules.php.
Feel free to discuss any topics here. Please use the Politics sub-forum for political conversations. While most topics will be allowed please be sure to be respectful and follow our normal site rules at http://www.webdiplomacy.net/rules.php.
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:36 pm
- Contact:
South Korean Teenagers Detained Over Deepfake Sexual Images
"Under South Korean law, people convicted of making sexually explicit deepfakes with the intention to distribute them face punishments of up to five years in prison or a fine of up to 50 million won, or $37,000. "
"Okay, quick question. The Internet. That's the one with e-mail, right?"
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: South Korean Teenagers Detained Over Deepfake Sexual Images
Forgot citation. This was in the New York Times.
"Okay, quick question. The Internet. That's the one with e-mail, right?"
- Octavious
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:16 pm
- Location: The Five Valleys, Gloucestershire
- Contact:
Re: South Korean Teenagers Detained Over Deepfake Sexual Images
Presumably sexually explicit deep fakes of real people? The crime being abusing someone's image rather than AI characters taking jobs from porn stars?
It raises a few interesting questions. The intent to distribute kind of implies that they consider making deep fakes for personal use acceptable... which feels wrong. Then you have the question of how closely does the fake have to resemble a real person to count? With 8 billion of us on the planet you'd imagine making an AI who doesn't at least have a passing resemblance to quite a lot of people would be rather tricky. If you were to give your AI creation different coloured eyes and a mole would that be far enough away from the copied person to be acceptable?
This sounds very much like one of those exciting new laws designed to provide lawyers more employment opportunities
It raises a few interesting questions. The intent to distribute kind of implies that they consider making deep fakes for personal use acceptable... which feels wrong. Then you have the question of how closely does the fake have to resemble a real person to count? With 8 billion of us on the planet you'd imagine making an AI who doesn't at least have a passing resemblance to quite a lot of people would be rather tricky. If you were to give your AI creation different coloured eyes and a mole would that be far enough away from the copied person to be acceptable?
This sounds very much like one of those exciting new laws designed to provide lawyers more employment opportunities
I eat cookies to improve my snacking experience
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 34531
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: South Korean Teenagers Detained Over Deepfake Sexual Images
Shouldn't this be in the politics forum?
Fuck Israel, but now in bigger writing
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Vasisubani