If Austria moves to Venice and Tyrolia you can't get him out of Venice. And assuming that Russia does not have an army in Gal he gets two builds and has a huge head start on you. If the suspected juggernaut does not form, then Austria is set. The thing with this is that it relies on a juggernaut to ...

Octavious wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:50 am

If you solo from time to time you're doing it right. If you never solo you're doing it wrong. It's that simple. Those who see the game as an exercise in forming a game long alliance have misunderstood the concept and are robbing their fellow players of an enjoyable experience.

I agree completely.

cool

Looks awesome. How long will phases be?

YanksFan47 wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:25 pm

As long as the Pats don't win, I'm happy.

My thoughts exactly.

Rounding, what's it good for?

It gives the person who joined slightly more information then everyone else. If you have access to all past messages from two different nations then you can use that to your advantage even if only on nation is still alive. At least that is what someone else told me. Not sure how much of an advantage...

I would play in multiple games as well.

Happy New Year!

Yes, it tastes like chicken.

@Eden, I think you may be right about Italy being a better ally. @Jason, I don't think an unsustainable western triple alliance is a good idea for Germany. France will be content with pushing south, but England will most likely get stuck in StP and then some crashing down on you, while France won't ...

To answer you three questions: 1. If you are willing to give up blocking Sweden then you can choose who gets Belgium. But you need to be generous with it, because the last thing you need is three builds in 1901. I generally move to Denmark in Spring of 01 so I let France and England fight over Belgi...