08 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 1: Hello Rome, I am very interested in securing a non agression agreement with you and that you don't enter the Punic sea. What do you think about that? |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 1: Egypt, I take Numidia and you Cyrene? |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: Persia how about peace between us? We leave BIT, GAL & ISA as Neutral? |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: fair enough |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: BTW good luck all |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: There isn't mch commnication going on! |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: I agree on a neutral act |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: Who with Rome? |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: You |
08 Nov 11 UTC | Autumn, 1: Deal! |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: Persia, I have no interest in attacking you |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: You going to leave Jerusalem then? |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: No, but i am not going to advance towards you at all |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: towards Persia* |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: Your going to advance towards Persia? |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: If you read my message, I clearly said "I am not going to advance towards [Persia] at all." I do not understand why you are trying to skew my words so it sounds like I will attack him |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: Because it's in my interests for you to have more than one front to fight! |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: I understand you want me to be attacked form everywhere but attempting to skew my words when they quite obviously say something different is a pathetic way to turn people on me |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: Your words weren't that clear, in fact, you corrected yourself because of it! |
10 Nov 11 UTC | Spring, 4: My words were extremely clear because I addressed Persia specifically. However, when you responded, I replied with "you" and it was referencing you instead of Persia and thus I corrected myself. That has no effect on how clear my intent to not attack Persia was. |