Messages - webDiplomacy

Chat archive

24 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2000: [Quebec]:Hello all, have a good game.
24 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2000: [Pacific-Russia]:Good luck!
24 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2000: [Frozen-Antarctica]:Good luck All
24 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2000: [Oz]:good luck
25 Nov 10 UTC	Autumn, 2000: [Brazil]:Have a nice time.
27 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2001: GameMaster: This user was banned: Auto. The time until the next phase has been extended from <span class="timeremaining" unixtime="1290960903" unixtimefrom="1290900274">16 hours, 50 minutes</span> to <span class="timeremaining" unixtime="1290986674" unixtimefrom="1290900274">1 days</span> (one full phase) so you can find a new player to take his place if you want to. Make sure to finalize your orders if you don't want to wait, so the game isn't held up unnecessarily.
27 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2001: [Kenya]:Mods: Brazil?
27 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2001: [Quebec]:holy lol if it was brazil.
28 Nov 10 UTC	Spring, 2001: [Frozen-Antarctica]:i play in weekend with Aung Oakkar in a blitz game. There was something strange about this player. I felt like playing with two accounts.
30 Nov 10 UTC	Autumn, 2001: [Brazil]:Someone is cheating?????
11 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2003: [Brazil]:Kill Quebec and their multiple Canada. Dirty scoundrels
11 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2003: [Russia]:I concur. GTFO my continent.
15 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Brazil]:West Canada can take all of sth America. None for Quebec. So take out Quebec asap
15 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [India]:On the other hand, Quebec is doing a pretty good job taking random territories across the ocean. That's not an easy thing to do, considering their size. Same to you, west Canada. Fight the dirty Russians.
15 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Brazil]:Random is a sign of poor play and desperation. As a replacement I dunno what his play has been like previously tho
15 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Quebec]:uh; i've been here since first turn.
15 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Quebec]:The Kingdom of Quebec has issued a declaration that the Territory known as great britain, owned by the nation of europe is hereinafter a neutral territory, protected from aggression by international law. Any hostile actions against a neutral nation are punishable by diplomatic ostricism and severe international backlash.
16 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [India]:Does that include Spain? I want Spain...
16 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Quebec]:After six weeks of debate, the high court of the arbitration conference on international law has concluded that it need not decide on whether or not non-CP territories constitute actual "parts" of nations or whether they are "strategic interests" because a prior issue is dispositive in this case. The kingdom of Quebec did not state in its 4:43AM declaration that the nation of Europe itself was a neutral territory, but rather that the territory of of great britain was a neutral territory protected by international law; ownership of which belongs to the nation of europe. Also, by default, an attack on Great Britain is an attack on the very existence of the nation of Europe. Therefore the declaration is in substance declaring the nation of Europe to be neutral and protected by international law; but not in form. The nation of Europe is a partisan territory de juris and therefore cannot be neutral by definition. All that the 3:44AM declaration does is state that it will be punished by international law for the territory of Great Britain to change holding from its present nation to another. (yes you can have spain if you need it)
16 Dec 10 UTC	Autumn, 2004: [Oz]:you must be a law major!