Messages - webDiplomacy

Chat archive

10 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1995: If France and Turkey NMR next phase and go into CD then do you guys want to draw?
10 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1995: No...there's always someone who flakes. It'll be easy pickins for a few players but things tend to adjust pretty quickly.
10 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1995: hello
14 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 1996: Hello, 'new' France here
22 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1998: If any nation reach 20 SCs we should adopt a "all vs 1" strategy. does anyone disagree?
22 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1998: What does poland think?
22 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 1998: Well I mean yeah that makes sense in WTA format, but of course currently leading the game it's not like I'm going to encourage you all to go after me if I'm lucky enough to reach 20
26 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: When Italy will be defeated, it will be time to draw or all vs 1.
26 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: @spain why are you so concerned about the all-vs-one or draw here? This is a relatively decent game we have going on here. 20 SCs is quite far from the necessary 33 for a solo. There are no stalemates going on. Still lots of fighting to be done in France, the British Isles and Egypt is making great headway against Turkey in the South. Why draw when the game has many more folds left to play out?
26 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: Easy: If we don't draw, YOU will win the solo and WE ALL will lose.
26 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: again, I see your point, but it's not as if I have 30 SCs. I have 19. It's a bit premature in my opinion
26 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: A player with 30 SCs is always unstoppable.
27 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: What's funny is that Poland is doing exactly what this game is about. instead of complaining, maybe, one of u guys could get more sc so u alone can challenge Poland and win ur selves. I mean its not like ur first plane won't work since u've made it global.
27 Mar 14 UTC	Spring, 2000: Thanks Russia. Just to clarify I don't object with what Spain is saying, in a WTA it makes perfect sense to go after the person who has the most SCs. Never understood when there was a clear leader why everyone didn't gang up on them to keep the game going. However, at this point in time I just don't view myself as 'running away' with the game. I'd say 4-5 more SCs would be needed for that. Of course you might think I say this only cause I'm leading, but it's my opinion.
27 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: Not to hammer this point anymore, but to prove my point further, Egypt is about to potentially pick up 4-6 SC's in the next turn or two putting them prettttty close to my approximately 20 SCs therefore making it a bit premature to gang up on someone with 20SCs so quickly since we would need to immediately change our strategy and go after Egypt
27 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: What are you talking about? I only have 9 SCs and at best I will be able to take 4 maybe 5 more SCs from Turkey while you will be able to take 3 from Turkey and 2 or 3 more in the West which will give you around 25 SCs and I will only have around 15 so I don't see why people should attack me. I do agree though that someone having 20 SCs is no reason to immediately attack them but once they pass 25 I usually begin to sound the alarm.
28 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: Spain is going for survivor so count him out of any coordinated action…too bad for me.
28 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: Survivor in a WTA game?
28 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: whoops sorry Egypt I didn't look close enough and looked at Russia's numbers! :(
28 Mar 14 UTC	Autumn, 2000: Yes Spain, please tell everyone why you are harassing me while the WTA game slips away...