30 Aug 13 UTC |
Spring, 1: game on! |
05 Sep 13 UTC |
Spring, 3: Man, Rome being absent really screws the match up |
05 Sep 13 UTC |
Spring, 3: So vote draw, I did |
05 Sep 13 UTC |
Spring, 3: Sorry, you did, my bad |
06 Sep 13 UTC |
Spring, 3: Alright, I'm voting draw too. |
14 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: Lets all just gang up on one person, just because he actually wants to play, instead of chicken out like everyone else... |
14 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: You just don't get it, do you? when one player, in what is only a 5 person game to begin with, CD's from the start and gives you the advantage, it is no longer a fair or fun game. Three of the four remaining agreed to draw. You did not, so we are playing against you, pretty simple |
14 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: You could have fought me for Rome early on, but you decided not to. Now your regretting that decision and acting like a coward, turning everyone else against me for playing smarter than you. |
14 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: dude, you've taken 1 Roman center and there is a green wave coming ... I have no regrets |
15 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: Bring it! |
15 Sep 13 UTC |
Autumn, 6: Sure, it works out alright for you when Rome is absent. You get a bunch of extra SCs unopposed. Egypt and Persia, we have active opponents on both sides and actually have to fight to get above 6. What was a balanced game now has two powers in a strong opening position, and two in a weak position. |
08 Oct 13 UTC |
Well played... ish... |
08 Oct 13 UTC |
I just don't understand why you wouldn't cancel or draw when Rome chose not to play at the beginning |
08 Oct 13 UTC |
Because, instead of ruining it like you said it did, it made it interesting... Caused everyone to turn one me... This was the most fun game I've played in a while! 3 on 1 was quite a challenge! |
08 Oct 13 UTC |
This was the wurst most annoying game I've played in a long while |
08 Oct 13 UTC |
Hehe... Thats why I enjoyed it so much! ;) |