gameID=86017Three pages of comments about someone's tactic and even a single word concretely about what England did in that game,just a bunch of a jelous players like Lopt,PE an YJ who suck at Diplomacy Game but they are champions in insulting and whining publicly about a player who has attacked them in a game instead of attacking somebody else and help them to win a game.
Look at their excuses - "he attacked me in a game of Diplomacy so that makes him a shit fucking player". I don't know if I ever need to discuss anything about the game tactic with these psychos,realy.
England open pro-France and France open pro-England.And Russia took Sweden only.And having problems on the south and having Warsaw and Moscow empty he decided to Build in St.Peterburg?!? What I should have done? Not attacking him but waiting him to attack me?
In the year '02 France was facing two German armies contesting Belgium and he had three units to take it but he has decided to order a single attack from Burgundy (and I wondered at the time how he knew Germany would have holded with Holland and Ruhr?!?) and he convoyed Picardy to Walles and came with another fleet to the Irish Sea. He was so fucking briliant and I wonder what would these three dickheads have done to not "ruin the game".
I repeat,a bunch of sad losers. Look guys,it's not a problem you suck at diplomacy,the problem is you suck and you are not aware of it.
So long.