Sorry, this was the end of another post of mine.
I agree with Jamie about the background. I'll add some more to the overall thrust of his comments.
One has to remember that the successful revolution in Czechoslovakia, where workers & peasants threw off the rule of landlords & bankers, was the immediate cause of the formation of NATO. The imperialists were so terrified of socialism in Czechoslovakia they formed an aggressive alliance with which they could use to contain the spread of democracy and dominate Europe. After the successful revolution the Americans immediately tried to strangulate Czechoslovakia economically and subvert it from within & without. It should come as no surprise that the western press, and so-called "anarchists" and faux leftists (who manage to side with every act of capitalist restoration anywhere), laud the attempt at capitalist restoration in 1968.
"The United States could greatly help the present positive evolution in
Czechoslovakia by extending to her the long overdue privilege of
receiving the most-favored-nation treatment in respect to tariffs.
Furthermore, the United States has blocked the return to Czechoslovakia
of the gold reserves of the prewar period Prague Government. Their return would be a telling symbol of American good will." (NY Times, March 12, 1968).
And 1968 was definitely a coup aimed at capitalist restoration.
The putchists called for joint capital ventures between Czech enterprises negotiated independently with western capitalists. It announced it would make its currency convertible with the dollar instead of the ruble. They announced their support for states like Israel & the Vatican, the Vatican, the same state-let that was only 'government' to recognize the Cedras coup that ousted the popular government of Aristide. A state that has a notorious history of supporting reaction throughout the world. The putschists called for an end to aid to revolutionary struggles, including the Vietnamese resistance. They rehabilitated reactionary figures from Czech history.
Here's what the 1968 action program said:
"It is not possible to permanently blunt economic policy by taking
from those who work well and giving to those who work badly.
Therefore it is necessary to objectivize value relations so that
differences in the income situation among enterprises express the
real differences in the standard of their work.
Democratization of the economy includes in particular the
realization of the independence of enterprises and enterprise
groupings and their relative independence of state bodies ... the
right and real possibility of different groups of working people and
different social groups to formulate and defend their economic
interests in creating the economic policy."
During 1965, the average pay of administrative employees was only
64.3 percent of workers' pay, whereas salaries of engineers and
technicians were only 30 percent higher than workers' pay (this is written as a complaint).
Techniky Tydenik, Prague, August 1966
They want a much sharper differentiation in wages. They realize
that inefficient firms will suffer. ... A high official in the Ministry of
Foreign Trade avowed that "a little unemployment would be a
good thing."
Ross Terrill in New Republic, May 18, 1968
Cooperation of Czechoslovakia with capitalist countries is not
influenced by interference from COMECON (East European and
Soviet trade association) as a whole or from individual states.
Premier Oldrich Cernik, press conference of May
14, 1968
What specifically is involved? Nothing more than the demand for
complete rehabilitation of all noncommunists, who have had to
suffer for many years.
The possibility of revolt leaves us completely indifferent. We have
no reason to be enthusiastic about a change of persons. ... We must
liquidate this dictatorship or it will liquidate us.
Lecture by Prof. Ivan Svitak, School of Philosophy,
Charles Univ., Prague, in Student, April 10, 1968
Dubcek is a figure of transition. His fundamental dilemma is that solutions that are
required are not provided for in accepted Marxist dogma. The more effectively the
new team tackles outstanding tasks, the more it will contribute to the final
disintegration of communist rule.
Hanus J. Hasek, staff of Radio Free Europe
From the point of view of the worliers, the economic reform seems
to be yielding quicli payoffs mainly to their superiors while the
prospect of ultimate benefits for workers appears remote. Workers
have, of course, failed to respond to the deleveling proposals with
much enthusiasm.
Vaclav Holeslawsky
*So much for the idea that the "Czech people" were enthusiastic about this coup.
Czechoslovakia hopes to gradually open the Czechoslovak national
economy to the influence of the world market.
Rude Pravo, April 25, 1968
Playwright Vaclav Havel in Liternarni Listy, April
4, 1968
Another important element, which speaks to what Jamie is talking about, is the Czech "reformers" reprochment with neo-Nazi West Germany, who did not recognize the GDR and whom the reformers entered into economic relations with. West Germany had always aimed at annexing the GDR, and getting their hands on Czechoslovakia was a major step at achieving that goal.
It is the height of irony that the butchers of Vietnam and Korea whined about the intervention against counterrevolution in Czechoslovakia, which they would not have supported so enthusiastically if it wasn't, in fact, a capitalist restoration project.